Adamas Trust is the renamed New York Mortgage Trust, a hybrid mortgage REIT that combines an Agency RMBS book with a growing business‑purpose loan origination platform (Constructive).
The 2025 repositioning expanded the portfolio by roughly 42% to about $10.5 billion, produced $101 million of GAAP net income, EAD per share of $0.89 for the year, and lifted GAAP and adjusted book to $9.60 and $10.63 per share, respectively.
In Q1 2026, momentum continued with EAD of $0.29 per share versus a $0.23 dividend, GAAP book of $9.98, adjusted book of $10.80, and company recourse leverage of 5.2x. Despite these improvements, we do not find a durable competitive advantage consistent with our quality‑value framework.
Agency spread income and credit results remain highly sensitive to rates, funding conditions, and housing credit performance.
While Constructive adds fee income, pipeline visibility, and some vertical integration, its advantages are replicable in a competitive BPL market, and the overall enterprise still depends on short‑term repo and securitization funding.
This profile lacks the predictable, high‑return reinvestment characteristics and structural moat we seek for long‑term compounding.
Moat components and scores: Intangible assets 35/100 (funding and securitization relationships; Constructive brand has some borrower recognition, but is not unique), Switching costs 25/100 (borrowers and whole loan buyers have multiple options; Agency RMBS and credit investors can reallocate quickly), Network effects 0/100 (none), Cost advantages 55/100 (scale improves repo terms, securitization execution and pool selection, but peers can match), Efficient scale 35/100 (BPL lending and Agency RMBS are large, competitive markets).
Weighted by importance (cost advantages heavier; network effects lighter), the blended moat score is ~33. We view any edge as execution‑based rather than structural, and vulnerable to capital markets competition and funding cycles.
The Constructive acquisition adds vertical integration and some pipeline control, but competitors with similar platforms exist and barriers are moderate.
True pricing power is limited. Agency spreads are market‑set and compress in risk‑on periods; origination price and fees in BPL are constrained by competitive lenders.
Constructive can occasionally command better economics on speed and certainty of execution, but those advantages are transient. 2025 and Q1 2026 margin gains stem primarily from portfolio mix, scale, and spread tailwinds rather than the ability to reprice without volume loss. We see little latent pricing power independent of the cycle.
Adamas now reports EAD to better reflect recurring earnings, which improved through 2025 and Q1 2026, with TTM EAD per share near $0.98 and dividends of $0.23 per quarter. Still, earnings, book value, and liquidity are sensitive to rate volatility, prepayments, credit performance in seasoned and business‑purpose loans, and repo haircuts.
The firm hedges with swaps and TBAs, yet mark‑to‑market and basis risks remain. We consider the enterprise moderately cyclical and below our preferred predictability threshold.
Positives: internally managed REIT; adjusted book rose to $10.80 per share by March 31, 2026; quarterly dividend covered by EAD; redemption of $100 million 2026 notes; terming out funding via securitizations; issuance of 9.25% 2031 senior notes.
Constraints: company recourse leverage 5.2x, portfolio recourse 4.9x; reliance on short‑dated repo with 30–90 day maturities and margin requirements; exposure to delinquency trends in re‑performing and non‑performing loans; potential dilution from a $250 million ATM.
Liquidity and capital markets access are solid today, but vulnerability rises in stress.
2025 actions were generally constructive: rotated into Agency RMBS and BPL, consolidated Constructive to add fee income and origination economics, completed multiple securitizations, redeemed near‑term notes, and modestly raised the dividend alongside book growth.
We view the Constructive buy‑in as strategically sensible, improving control of loan supply and optionality between hold vs. sell. Offsetting considerations include the use of an ATM equity program and the inherently high reinvestment needs of a levered fixed‑income book.
Overall, decisions have been rational for a mortgage REIT, but do not elevate the business into high‑ROIC territory.
CEO Jason Serrano brings deep structured credit experience and has led the strategic pivot toward scalable earnings and book stability. Execution in 2025–Q1 2026 was solid, with higher EAD, dividend coverage, and improved book metrics. Compensation appears meaningful and equity‑linked, and insider RSU grants continue.
We consider the team capable and aligned for the REIT model, though the opportunity set they operate in remains cyclical and competitive, limiting our ceiling for this score.

Is Adamas Trust a good investment at $8.98?
The following analysis is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice, investment advice, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. The opinions expressed are based on publicly available information and historical data. Beanvest and its contributors may hold positions in the securities mentioned. Investors should conduct their own due diligence or consult a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decision.