Cognizant is a large, diversified IT services firm with resilient client relationships, a scaled global delivery model, and a solid balance sheet.
Under CEO Ravi Kumar S and CFO Jatin Dalal, execution has improved: margins expanded, bookings rose, and capital returns accelerated while selective acquisitions strengthened higher-value capabilities in ServiceNow, engineering, and Microsoft Azure.
Trailing-twelve-month free cash flow to the September 30, 2025 quarter is approximately 2.72 billion dollars, supported by 27.5 billion dollars of TTM bookings, a 1.3x book-to-bill, and net cash on the balance sheet. Quality is good but not elite.
Moat elements exist in switching costs, brand, and cost advantage, yet competition from Accenture, TCS, Infosys, Capgemini and rapid AI automation keep pricing power moderate. Cybersecurity execution remains a notable risk highlighted by Clorox’s lawsuit regarding a 2023 breach.
We estimate a fair free-cash-flow multiple of about 16x, implying a central fair value near 90 dollars per share on our TTM FCF per-share estimate, with interest below the mid‑70s for a margin of safety.
Cognizant’s moat is multi-faceted but not impregnable. Intangible assets/brand (score 75/100): trusted enterprise brand in North America and Europe with long histories in Health Sciences and Financial Services and recognition as a top employer, supporting recruiting and client confidence.
Switching costs (80/100): embedded teams, multi‑year large deals, and domain/process knowledge make vendor changes disruptive; TTM bookings of 27.5 billion dollars and book‑to‑bill ~1.3x reflect durable demand.
Cost advantage (78/100): scaled global delivery with roughly 350k associates and improving attrition supports competitive rates and utilization. Efficient scale (70/100): in many accounts, only a handful of global vendors can meet compliance and delivery needs, though rivalry is intense. Network effects (40/100): limited beyond partner ecosystems.
Weighted view (switching costs 35%, cost advantage 25%, brand 25%, efficient scale 10%, network 5%) yields a composite around mid‑70s. Risks to moat include AI automation compressing hours/rates, aggressive peers, and client vendor consolidation; targeted acquisitions and IP-led offerings aim to offset these.
Pricing is adequate in staples like ADM, AMS, and managed services, and better in scarce skills such as ServiceNow, Azure/AI, and ER&D A&D, but overall remains constrained by competition and client procurement. 2024 adjusted operating margin of ~15.3% and 2025 guidance for ~15.7% show gradual expansion rather than high pricing leverage.
The Belcan, Thirdera, and 3Cloud acquisitions tilt mix toward higher-value work where premium rates are more defensible. AI-assisted delivery (e.g., code generation and vibe coding programs) can expand unit margins by reducing delivery cost, partially substituting for direct price hikes.
Latent pricing power is modest outside of niche areas; sustained expansion relies on mix shift and productivity rather than headline rate increases.
Revenue is diversified across verticals with a heavy mix of recurring managed services and multi‑year projects, producing steady cash conversion. 2024 revenue grew 2% and 2025 growth guidance increased to ~6.0–6.3% constant currency with adjusted operating margin uplift.
TTM bookings reached ~27.5 billion dollars with a 1.3x book‑to‑bill and a record number of large deals, improving forward visibility. Macro sensitivity and discretionary project pauses remain, especially in Financial Services and CMT, but overall volatility is lower than product-centric or capex-heavy sectors.
AI adoption introduces some uncertainty (automation of hours vs new AI programs), though net effect appears constructive in 2025 results and pipeline.
Balance sheet carries net cash as of September 30, 2025: cash and equivalents 2.34 billion dollars against total debt of ~584 million dollars, and strong free cash flow. 2024 free cash flow was ~1.83 billion dollars; for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 FCF was ~1.88 billion dollars, and adding Q4‑2024 (0.84 billion) implies TTM FCF around 2.72 billion dollars.
Revolver usage decreased by 2025 Q3 with term loan maturities manageable. Capital intensity is low; cash conversion is strong. Key financial risks include cybersecurity liabilities (e.g., Clorox lawsuit) and Indian tax disputes; however, current liquidity and FCF provide ample shock absorption.
Management has articulated a 50/50 framework for deploying free cash flow between M&A and shareholder returns.
In 2024, 1.2 billion dollars was returned via buybacks and dividends; in 2025 the company was on track to return ~2.0 billion dollars, with 13.1 million shares repurchased for ~994 million dollars YTD through Q3 and a quarterly dividend raised to 0.31 dollars per share.
The repurchase authorization had ~2.24 billion dollars remaining as of September 30, 2025. M&A has been focused and strategic: Thirdera (ServiceNow), Belcan (ER&D, A&D), and 3Cloud (Azure/AI) improve mix and capabilities and appear sensibly sized. SBC is contained (stock-based compensation expense ~175 million dollars in 2024).
Execution risk exists in integrating Belcan and 3Cloud and achieving synergy/margin targets, but the program is coherent and supported by FCF.
CEO Ravi Kumar S and CFO Jatin Dalal bring deep industry and operating experience. Since 2023 leadership changes, Cognizant has stabilized growth, expanded margins, raised guidance, and accelerated capital returns while investing in AI platforms and skilling (Synapse). Large‑deal momentum has improved meaningfully.
An activist shareholder (Mantle Ridge) provides additional governance pressure for performance. Risks include reputation and controls around cybersecurity, highlighted by the Clorox litigation, and the need to sustain cultural and talent improvements at scale. Overall execution trend is positive with clearer strategic focus.

Is Cognizant a good investment at $74?
The following analysis is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice, investment advice, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. The opinions expressed are based on publicly available information and historical data. Beanvest and its contributors may hold positions in the securities mentioned. Investors should conduct their own due diligence or consult a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decision.