co

ConocoPhillips

COP
NYSE
$104.37
67
Average

Scale and LNG optionality meet disciplined returns, but commodity risk dominates

ConocoPhillips is now one of the largest independent E&Ps after closing the all‑stock acquisition of Marathon Oil in November 2024, with a deeper U.S. shale inventory, a growing LNG platform and long-cycle Alaska growth from Willow.

Management targets incremental free cash flow of roughly 7 billion dollars by 2029 from LNG start-ups, Willow first oil and cost actions, while maintaining a shareholder return framework of at least 30 percent of cash from operations and top‑quartile dividend growth.

Recent updates include an 8 percent dividend raise to 0.84 dollars per quarter, 2025 production guidance of about 2.375 MMBOED, lower 2025 operating cost guidance and preliminary 2026 capex of about 12 billion dollars.

Willow capex is now guided to 8.5 to 9.0 billion dollars with first oil narrowed to early 2029 after the Ninth Circuit allowed the project to proceed pending further BLM explanation.

On trailing data, ConocoPhillips generated about 19.9 billion dollars of operating cash flow and spent roughly 12.8 billion dollars on capital in the last four reported quarters (Q4 2024 to Q3 2025), for an estimated 7.1 billion dollars of TTM free cash flow.

Net debt at Q3 2025 was about 16.9 billion dollars (short‑ and long‑term debt of roughly 23.5 billion minus cash and short‑term investments of 6.6 billion), with cash and long‑term investments totaling about 7.7 billion dollars. End‑Q3 2025 shares outstanding were about 1.236 billion.

We view financial strength as solid for a cyclical producer, supported by an A credit rating from Fitch. However, pricing power remains structurally limited and results are volatile with commodity swings, which tempers our overall quality view despite meaningful cost and scale advantages.

published on January 22, 2026 (12 days ago)

Does ConocoPhillips have a strong competitive moat?

60
Average

ConocoPhillips benefits from scale, high‑quality acreage and a diversified global portfolio across the Lower 48, Alaska, Canada oil sands and international gas/LNG, which confers a cost advantage versus many independents.

The 2023 analyst day framed a roughly 35 dollar WTI FCF breakeven and a sub‑40 dollar WTI cost‑of‑supply resource base, indicating durable low‑cost inventory.

Efficient scale applies in select basins like Alaska and in LNG marketing, where the company has secured positions in Qatar NFE/NFS and Gulf Coast offtake at Port Arthur and Rio Grande, which improve market access and realizations. Intangibles include the Optimized Cascade LNG technology licensing business, although it is not a core profit driver.

There are no meaningful network effects and customer switching costs are minimal given the commodity nature.

Potential moat erosion stems from cost inflation in remote Alaska development (Willow capex now 8.5 to 9.0 billion dollars), regulatory and permitting risk in sensitive jurisdictions, and the long‑term energy transition which may pressure oil demand.

Component scores and weights: cost advantage 75 (weight 40 percent), efficient scale 60 (25 percent), intangibles 55 (20 percent), switching costs 25 (10 percent), network effects 5 (5 percent). Weighted result approximates 59 to 60.

Does ConocoPhillips have pricing power in its industry?

25
Weak

As a price‑taker in global oil and gas markets, ConocoPhillips has limited direct pricing power. The company can improve realizations through marketing, LNG optionality and mix, but cannot independently raise commodity prices without losing sales. Margin protection is primarily via cost structure and capital discipline.

Management’s return framework and cost‑reduction program, including workforce reductions, help defend cash margins, yet cannot offset sustained commodity price declines.

How predictable is ConocoPhillips's business?

50
Average

Production guidance is clear and near‑term growth is visible, with 2025 guidance of about 2.375 MMBOED and preliminary 2026 guidance showing flat to modest growth and lower operating costs.

Longer‑dated projects provide line of sight to step‑ups: LNG offtake contracts with start‑ups expected in 2026 to 2031 and Willow first oil targeted in early 2029. Still, cash flows remain intrinsically volatile, tracking commodity prices, fiscal regimes and cost inflation.

We view predictability as mid‑range for the sector, better than small E&Ps given scale and diversification but far below toll‑like business models.

Is ConocoPhillips financially strong?

82
Good

TTM operating cash flow of about 19.9 billion dollars against roughly 12.8 billion dollars of capex produced an estimated 7.1 billion dollars of free cash flow for the last four reported quarters.

At Q3 2025 the company held about 6.6 billion dollars of cash and short‑term investments, plus 1.1 billion dollars of long‑term investments, against approximately 23.5 billion dollars of total debt, implying net debt around the high teens in billions.

Liquidity is strong, maturities are manageable, and Fitch affirms an A rating with Stable Outlook, reflecting scale, diversification and conservative policy. This provides resilience through cycles, despite the commodity exposure.

How effective is ConocoPhillips's capital allocation strategy?

83
Good

Management has a clear cash return framework of returning at least 30 percent of cash from operations, evidenced by 2024 returns of 9.1 billion dollars and a 2025 target of 10 billion dollars at then‑current prices. The ordinary dividend was increased 8 percent to 0.84 dollars per quarter, with a stated goal of top‑quartile dividend growth.

Share repurchases continue and management plans to retire the shares issued in the Marathon deal within two to three years, subject to prices. M&A integration and portfolio high‑grading proceed alongside divestments. Capex is sizable but focused on high‑return, low cost‑of‑supply projects and LNG growth.

The main risks are cycle timing of buybacks and execution of large projects like Willow.

Does ConocoPhillips have high-quality management?

85
Good

CEO Ryan Lance has led ConocoPhillips since 2012 with a consistent focus on balance sheet strength, low breakeven portfolio, disciplined capital allocation and scaled positions in advantaged basins and LNG.

Governance is conventional for a large U.S. company, with independent directors and annual elections, and 2025 proposals to eliminate supermajority voting. Compensation is performance‑oriented. Notably, management is executing significant cost actions including workforce reductions.

Insider sales occur, but overall alignment remains acceptable for a mature large cap. Credit markets and rating agencies view management discipline favorably.

Average

Is ConocoPhillips a quality company?

ConocoPhillips is an average quality company with a quality score of 67/100

67
Average
  • Portfolio quality and scale improved with Marathon Oil, plus 1 billion dollars per year of targeted synergies and share retirements planned over two to three years; 2024 proved reserves preliminarily 7.8 BBOE with a 244 percent reserve‑replacement ratio.
  • Visible multi‑year free cash flow uplift from three LNG projects and Willow; management guides about 1 billion dollars per year of FCF improvement 2026 to 2028 and a step‑up to about 7 billion by 2029.
  • Low breakeven focus: company’s long‑term plan is anchored on a roughly 35 dollar WTI free cash flow breakeven and a resource base screened at less than 40 dollar WTI cost of supply.
  • TTM FCF of roughly 7.1 billion dollars against net debt near 17 billion dollars and an A credit rating supports resilience, but commodity exposure and cost inflation at Willow remain key risks.
  • Workforce reduction plan of 20 to 25 percent and noncore asset sales aim to lower costs and fund returns amid volatile prices.

What is the fair value of ConocoPhillips stock?

Is ConocoPhillips a good investment at $104?

$104.37
Important Disclaimer:

The following analysis is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice, investment advice, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. The opinions expressed are based on publicly available information and historical data. Beanvest and its contributors may hold positions in the securities mentioned. Investors should conduct their own due diligence or consult a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decision.

Other stocks from New York Stock Exchange