Interprétation IA fondée sur des extraits vérifiés. Les déclarations de l’entreprise et les limites de couverture restent explicites.
Méthode quality-scores-2 : six catégories de même poids. Le score global exige une couverture complète. Les données manquantes ne valent pas zéro. Les évaluations qualitatives sont des interprétations sourcées, pas des probabilités. 3/6 · 22/10/2026
Moat50
Equal-weight average of four evidence-backed rubric grades (0–4), scaled to 100.
structural advantage · 3/4 · Local operating density, negotiated procurement benefits and reported improvements for third-party portfolios support a demonstrated cost advantage. The platform improvement disclosure is issuer-reported and lacks controlled comparisons.
durability · 2/4 · Established local infrastructure and superior reported 2017–2025 comparative NOI growth support persistence. Replicability by institutional rivals and uncertain metric comparability prevent a strong durability conclusion.
customer dependency · 1/4 · Renewals and tenure demonstrate repeat demand, but one-to-two-year leases and weaker new-lease pricing indicate limited demonstrated dependency. These results do not establish material switching barriers.
erosion resilience · 2/4 · Positive Same Store NOI growth and renewals demonstrate some resilience. Expenses grew faster than matched revenues, occupancy softened, and disclosed future acquisition restrictions constrain flexibility. Potential regulatory effects are not treated as realized operating losses.
Pouvoir de fixation des prix56
Equal-weight average of four evidence-backed rubric grades (0–4), scaled to 100.
realized pricing · 2/4 · Q2 renewal, new-lease and blended growth were 3.3%, 1.1% and 2.7%; July–August results were 4.3%, 0.3% and 3.2%. Positive realized increases coexist with weak new-lease pricing and lower occupancy, supporting mixed pricing power.
retention · 3/4 · Direct operating disclosures show renewal rates of 78.4% in Q1 and 76.7% in Q2, with average Same Store resident tenure exceeding 40 months. These strongly support repeat demand, although the renewal rate declined and resilience to premium pricing is unproven.
margin resilience · 2/4 · Q2 Same Store NOI grew 1.5%, but matched operating expenses rose 1.9% against revenue growth of 1.6%, indicating slight property-level margin compression. Higher property management and G&A expenses further limit evidence of consolidated margin protection.
contractual freedom · 2/4 · Direct leases lasting typically one to two years and market-informed rate setting permit periodic repricing. Existing lease terms govern variable payments, while regulation can constrain flexibility. Pricing discretion is meaningful but bounded.
Prévisibilité—
Missing exact annual revenue, free cash flow or FCF margin; operating cash flow and capex must both be reported for all five years.
Solidité financière—
Missing required inputs: debtFcfGrade, netDebtEbitGrade, currentRatioGrade. Equal-weight grades: debt/FCF (1–8x), net debt/earnings before interest and tax (0–5x), interest service (1–12x), current ratio (0.75–2x). Earnings use reported operating income, or reported pretax profit plus reported interest expense when operating income is unavailable. Interest service uses earnings/interest expense; if unavailable, it uses reported operating cash flow/cash interest paid, without relabeling cash paid as accrued expense. Nonpositive cash flow/earnings score 0 for their service component; reported zero interest with a positive numerator scores 100. Net cash scores 100 for net leverage. Missing disclosures remain unavailable. General nonfinancial-company rubric, not a credit rating; exceptional and nonoperating gains are not normalized out. IFRS finance-cost and cash-flow classifications retain their reported scope.
- interestCoverageGrade
- 24.86
- cashInterestPaid
- 322.94
- cashInterestCoverage
- 3.74
Allocation du capital—
Missing required inputs: operatingReturn, cashConversionGrade. Three-year equal-weight indicators: pretax return on average invested capital (0–25%; equity + debt − cash, each year and its prior year), share-count growth (0–5%, lower better), share-based cost/revenue (2–20%, lower better), consolidated FCF/net income (0–1x). Return uses reported operating income or, if unavailable, EBIT calculated from reported pretax profit plus reported interest expense; exceptional/nonoperating gains are not normalized out. Share-based cost uses the reported cash-flow add-back or, if absent, separately reported recognized compensation expense; the latter never becomes an FCF adjustment. Nonpositive net income scores 0 for cash conversion; absent income/FCF stays unavailable. Nonpositive invested capital has no defined return and remains unavailable. Does not establish acquisition quality or buyback timing.
- 3-year average dilution (%)
- 0.17
- 3-year average SBC / revenue (%)
- 1.10
Qualité du management63
Equal-weight average of four evidence-backed rubric grades (0–4), scaled to 100.
capital discipline · 2/4 · Actual cash generation, disposition-funded repurchases and increased Core FFO and AFFO per share support disciplined deployment. The joint venture deployment miss and substantial remaining commitments temper the result; increased per-share figures do not establish attractive long-term investment returns.
incentive alignment · 3/4 · Actual grants include employment and performance or market vesting conditions, with three-year PRSU measurement. Historical cancellations demonstrate that performance conditions have operated, and hedging is prohibited. July's filing confirms plan effectiveness following May approval; the March proposal alone would not. Actual ownership amounts and full payout economics remain missing.
execution · 3/4 · Nine of ten operational goals were achieved and application-to-move-in conversion exceeded its target. Cash generation and per-share results provide additional operating support. These are specific issuer-reported achievements; missed joint venture deployment and values targets limit the assessment, and prospective construction synergies are excluded.
governance · 2/4 · Annual director elections, separation of chair and CEO, shareholder safeguards and independent related-party review provide substantive protections. The finalized FTC order and actual $48 million payment in 2024 provide contrary compliance evidence, without admission of liability or civil penalties. Recurrence is not established.
Preuves
11 ~300 bps Average margin expansion for 3PM owners after being added to INVH platform 35+ Sub-scale institutional operators of SFR (<10,000 homes each) 125,000+ Homes managed by sub-scale operators ~$0.01 Accretion for every 3K homes added ~24,000 JV & 3PM homes managed today Enhances INVH efficiencies Creates a pipeline of future acquisition opportunities $87M FY 2025 revenue Our JV & 3PM platform is the best-in-class engine for capital-light earnings growth
June 2026 investor presentation, slide 11: third-party management platform operating improvements · Dépôt 01/06/2026
For example, we have negotiated discounts and extended warranties for products that we regularly use during the renovation process, including appliances, HVAC systems and components, carpet and flooring, and paint, among others.
Business: negotiated renovation product discounts and extended warranties · Dépôt 19/02/2026
We are also able to reduce general contractor fees by working directly with vendors.
Business: direct vendor relationships and general contractor fees · Dépôt 19/02/2026
6 Sector-leading scale & density Pod 1 4,579 Homes Pod 2 4,219 Homes Pod 3 4,808 Homes Pod 4 4,777 Homes Owned and managed home counts as of 6/30/2026A T L A N T A Scale and density drive cost efficiency, pricing power, and margin expansion 6
September 2026 investor presentation, slide 6: Atlanta operating pod home counts and scale claims · Dépôt 09/09/2026
Our continued outperformance validates our strategy and disciplined execution +64.3% +57.0% +37.3% +22.3% Invitation Homes AMH National Multifamily Coastal Multifamily Indexed Same Store NOI Growth (2017-2025)
September 2026 investor presentation, slide 7: indexed Same Store NOI growth, 2017–2025 · Dépôt 09/09/2026
Data, including non-GAAP measures, is from public filings; there can be no assurance that our basis for computing this non-GAAP measure is comparable with that of other companies, including those mentioned above.
September 2026 investor presentation: qualification of comparative non-GAAP measures · Dépôt 09/09/2026
We believe our competitors in acquiring or building homes for investment purposes are larger investors, including private equity funds and other REITs, that are seeking to capitalize on the same market opportunity that we have identified, and individual investors or small private investment partnerships, that are seeking investment properties that can either be leased or restored and sold.
Business, Competition: institutional and individual acquisition competitors · Dépôt 19/02/2026
•Same Store NOI increased 1.5% year over year on 1.6% Same Store Core Revenues growth and 1.9% Same Store Core Operating Expenses growth.
Q2 2026 highlights: matched Same Store revenue, expense and NOI growth · Dépôt 29/07/2026
July-August 2026 Same Store Leasing Stats Same Store INVH 2Q 2026 INVH Jul-Aug 2025 INVH Jul-Aug 2026 Average Occupancy 97.1% 96.6% 96.4% Renewals Rental Rate Growth 3.3% +4.6% +4.3% New Leases Rental Rate Growth 1.1% -0.1% +0.3% Blended Rental Rate Growth 2.7% +3.2% +3.2% August YTD blended rental rate growth of 2.4% in line with expectations 3
September 2026 investor presentation, slide 3: Q2 and July–August leasing results · Dépôt 09/09/2026
In addition, executive actions and federal and state legislative, regulatory, or policy initiatives, particularly those focused on institutional ownership and acquisition of single-family homes, could limit our ability to acquire properties, impose additional compliance or operating requirements, or constrain pricing flexibility in certain markets.
Risk factors: possible acquisition, operating and pricing restrictions · Dépôt 19/02/2026
Resident satisfaction drives renewals, lowers turnover, and strengthens returns 8 4.10 / 5.0 Cumulative all-time Google / Yelp rating 4.78 / 5.0 Average stars on post- maintenance surveys >40 MONTHS Same Store avg resident tenure 97.1% Same Store avg occupancy rate 76.7% Same Store avg renewal rate As of or for the quarter ended 6/30/2026
September 2026 investor presentation, slide 8: Q2 renewal rate, tenure, occupancy and satisfaction · Dépôt 09/09/2026
Resident satisfaction drives renewals, lowers turnover, and strengthens returns 7 4.10 / 5.0 Cumulative all-time Google / Yelp rating 4.82 / 5.0 Average stars on post- maintenance surveys >40 MONTHS Same Store avg resident tenure 96.3% Same Store avg occupancy rate 78.4% Same Store avg renewal rate As of or for the quarter ended 3/31/2026
June 2026 investor presentation, slide 7: Q1 renewal rate, tenure and occupancy · Dépôt 01/06/2026
We enter into leases directly with our residents, and the leases typically have a term of one to two years.
MD&A, Rental Revenues: direct resident leases and typical contractual duration · Dépôt 30/07/2026
We establish and manage rental rates based on a tailored pricing tool that analyzes publicly available data to reflect local market conditions, including a competitive analysis of market rents for institutional single-family rental properties, as well as the size, fit and finish, and location of the home, the number of applications received, and the number of days a home has been available on the market.
Business, Marketing and Leasing: rental rate setting and market inputs · Dépôt 19/02/2026
Variable lease payments are charged based on the terms and conditions included in the resident leases.
Note 6, Rent Receivables: contractual terms governing variable lease payments · Dépôt 30/07/2026
Q2 2026 Earnings Release and Supplemental Information — page 12
Supplemental Schedule 2(b)
Debt Structure and Leverage Ratios — As of June 30, 2026
($ in thousands) (unaudited)
Wtd Avg
Wtd Avg
Interest
Years to
Debt Structure
Balance
Supplemental Schedule 7
Adjusted Property Management and G&A Reconciliation
($ in thousands) (unaudited)
Adjusted Property Management Expense
Q2 2026
Q2 2025
YTD 2026
YTD 2025
Property management expense (GAAP)
$
37,726
$
35,833
$
77,051
$
72,572
Adjustments:
Share-based compensation expense
(1,339)
(1,566)
(4,265)
(3,217)
Adjusted property management expense
$
36,387
$
34,267
$
72,786
$
69,355
Adjusted G&A Expense
Q2 2026
Q2 2025
YTD 2026
YTD 2025
G&A expense (GAAP)
$
29,332
$
23,591
$
61,651
$
53,109
Adjustments:
Share-based compensation expense
(8,007)
(6,898)
(15,781)
(15,404)
Business reorganization costs (1)
(1,279)
(35)
(2,780)
(2,420)
Adjusted G&A expense
$
20,046
$
16,658
$
43,090
$
35,285
(1)Includes severance, restructuring, acquisition, and integration costs.
Supplemental Schedule 7: property management and G&A expense reconciliation · Dépôt 29/07/2026
Net cash provided by operating activities was $1,206.2 million and $1,081.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, an increase of 11.5%.
MD&A, Operating Activities: 2025 and 2024 operating cash generation · Dépôt 19/02/2026
•We disposed of 657 wholly owned homes, many to families purchasing for their own use, and acquired 196 wholly owned homes, for net dispositions of 461 homes and net proceeds of approximately $234 million that were used for second quarter share repurchases and paying down debt that partially funded our first quarter share repurchases.
Q2 2026 highlights: actual dispositions and use of proceeds · Dépôt 29/07/2026
Capital allocation led by $700M of stock buybacks since December 2025 4.3% of shares outstanding have been repurchased since December 2025, making us a leader among Residential REITs Dispositions are our primary funding source Homes have been sold primarily to end users, including through our Resident First Look program Our YTD sales have been heavily weighted within our Southern California, South Florida, and Northern California markets Metric Value Detail Stock repurchases since Dec.
September 2026 investor presentation, slide 4: cumulative buybacks and disposition funding · Dépôt 09/09/2026
Weighted average common shares outstanding — diluted
592,497,804
613,261,904
599,328,126
613,312,641
Net income per common share — diluted
$
0.37
$
0.23
$
0.63
$
0.50
FFO, Core FFO, and AFFO
Weighted average common shares and OP Units outstanding — diluted
595,159,443
615,771,167
601,939,999
615,703,901
FFO per share — diluted
$
0.46
$
0.45
$
0.90
$
0.90
Core FFO per share — diluted
$
0.51
$
0.48
$
0.99
$
0.97
AFFO per share — diluted
$
0.44
$
0.41
$
0.85
$
0.84
(1)Includes our share from unconsolidated joint ventures.
Q2 2026 supplemental: Core FFO and AFFO per share results · Dépôt 29/07/2026
Joint venture capital deployment reached $175 million against a $200 million goal, reflecting partner yield expectation challenges.
Compensation discussion, strategic priorities: joint venture deployment shortfall · Dépôt 26/03/2026
As of June 30, 2026, our remaining equity commitments to our joint ventures total $93.7 million, and our remaining funding commitments for construction and development loans total $247.9 million.
Liquidity and Capital Resources: remaining joint venture and construction lending commitments · Dépôt 30/07/2026
Annual LTIP Awards: •Annual LTIP Awards Granted: During the six months ended June 30, 2026, we granted 1,519,420 RSUs pursuant to LTIP awards.
Note 10, Share-Based Awards: actual 2026 LTIP grants · Dépôt 30/07/2026
Each award includes components which vest based on time-vesting conditions, market-based vesting conditions, and/or performance-based vesting conditions, each of which is subject to continued employment through the applicable vesting date.
Note 10, Share-Based Awards: vesting conditions and continued employment · Dépôt 30/07/2026
LTIP PRSUs may be earned based on the achievement of certain measures over a three year performance period.
Note 10, Share-Based Awards: three-year PRSU performance period · Dépôt 30/07/2026
Certain other LTIP PRSUs did not achieve performance criteria, resulting in the cancellation of 47,145 awards during the year ended December 31, 2021.
Note 10: historical cancellation of PRSUs for unmet performance criteria · Dépôt 21/02/2024
Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy The Company’s directors, officers, and associates are prohibited from hedging the economic risk of their stock ownership and may not engage in hedging transactions with respect to the Company’s securities, including engaging in transactions in forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, exchange funds, puts, calls, options, and other derivative securities or any instruments designed to increase in value as a result of, or hedge or offset any decrease in, the market value of the Company’s securities.
Compensation discussion: actual anti-hedging policy · Dépôt 26/03/2026
2026 Incentive Omnibus Plan (the “2026 Omnibus Incentive Plan”) became effective upon approval of our stockholders, subsequent to adoption by our board of directors.
Note 10: effectiveness of 2026 incentive plan following stockholder approval · Dépôt 30/07/2026
Customer experience metrics remained strong, with an approved-application-to-move-in conversion rate of 71.1%, surpassing the 70.0% target.
Strategic priorities performance assessment: application-to-move-in conversion result · Dépôt 26/03/2026
Of ten operational goals, nine were achieved.
Strategic priorities performance assessment: operational goals achieved · Dépôt 26/03/2026
Purpose and values alignment scores remained below the 60% target level, though the Compensation and Management Development Committee recognized successful mid-year rollout of new purpose and values in its overall assessment.
Strategic priorities performance assessment: purpose and values target shortfall · Dépôt 26/03/2026
Corporate Governance Snapshot Director Nominees 9 Independent Director Nominees 8 Average Tenure of Directors Standing for Election (years) 5.3 Chairperson Position Separate from CEO ✓ Annual Election of All Directors ✓ Proxy Access (3%/3 years) ✓ No Stockholder Rights Plan ✓ Limits on the Number of Directorships Held by Directors ✓ Regular Executive Sessions of Independent Directors ✓ Commitment to Board Refreshment and Focus on Director Succession Planning ✓ Annual Board and Committee Self-Evaluations ✓ Risk Oversight by the Board and Committees ✓ Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Oversight by Board and Committees ✓ Proactive, Ongoing Engagement with Stockholders ✓ Stock Ownership Requirements for Directors and Executive Officers ✓ Hedging and Pledging Prohibition ✓ Incentive Compensation Clawback Policy ✓ Stockholder Rights and Accountability • Our Board is not classified, and each of our directors is subject to annual reelection (we will not classify our Board in the future without the approval of our stockholders).
Corporate Governance Snapshot: board structure, shareholder rights and compensation safeguards · Dépôt 26/03/2026
Each related person transaction shall either be approved or ratified by the Audit Committee or another independent body of the Board consisting of independent directors who are disinterested, as applicable, taking into consideration such relevant facts and circumstances as it shall deem appropriate, which may include: • the relationship of the related person to the Company; • the nature and extent of the related person’s interest in the transaction; • the material terms of the transaction; • the importance and fairness of the transaction both to the Company and to the related person; • the business rationale for engaging in the transaction; • whether the transaction would likely impair the judgment of a director or executive officer to act in the best interest of the Company; • whether the value and the terms of the transaction are substantially similar as compared to those of similar transactions previously entered into by the Company with non-related persons, if any; and • any other matters that disinterested members of the Audit Committee or another independent body of the Board consisting of independent directors who are disinterested, as applicable, deem appropriate.
Transactions with Related Persons: independent approval or ratification policy · Dépôt 26/03/2026
After fully cooperating with the inquiry and extensive negotiations with the FTC, we entered into a stipulated proposed order with the FTC, resolving all aspects of the inquiry without any admission of liability, which became final on September 27, 2024.
Legal and Other Matters: FTC order finalized September 27, 2024, without admission of liability · Dépôt 27/02/2025
Pursuant to the stipulated order, we paid $48,000 of monetary relief, with no civil penalties, to the FTC during the year ended December 31, 2024.
Legal and Other Matters: actual 2024 FTC monetary relief payment · Dépôt 27/02/2025
Resale (12-month average) Homebuilder forward purchasing Disciplined Acquisition Approach Auction purchases New home pricing more attractive MLS purchases † Historical average: 16.0%* Homebuilder Inventory ResiBuilt Construction lending Resale home pricing more attractive * Historical average: Jan-68 through Jun-26 † Beginning January 2027, the ROAD Act limits certain MLS purchases of existing homes, with exceptions including renovate-to-rent and homeownership assistance programs; we expect our other acquisition channels to remain unaffected.
September 2026 investor presentation, slide 9: disclosed January 2027 acquisition restrictions and expected channel exceptions · Dépôt 09/09/2026
