Skip to content

NXP Semiconductors N.V.

NASDAQ: NXPI · USD

NXP Semiconductors N.V. (NXPI) Economic Moat Analysis56

Avantages concurrentiels, preuves datées et risques d’érosion.

Narrow avantage concurrentiel

NXP has a narrow moat rooted in automotive qualification requirements, extensive design-in work and long product life cycles. Its established automotive sales and engineering support connect these barriers to an operating business. These advantages support switching friction within existing programs, but do not establish protection at future design selections. Realized inflation pass-through in 2023 demonstrates some pricing power; subsequent margin fluctuations and customer flexibility limit confidence in its durability. The passages do not establish a relative cost advantage, network effects or sustained technological superiority.

Switching costs

Automotive qualification, reliability and functional-safety requirements, combined with extensive design-in work, create switching friction for incumbent NXP components within customer programs. NXP's disclosed engineering support and substantial realized automotive revenue connect the industry barriers to its current business.

Durabilité
Long automotive product life cycles support persistence within qualified programs. Durability across replacement platforms is less established because new designs remain contestable. This is an inference from disclosed operating practices and qualification requirements, not a measured customer retention rate.
Concurrents
Comparaison non établie
Risques d’érosion
Architecture changes and technological substitution can reopen supplier selection. Customers have historically modified orders, and customization can leave NXP bearing inventory risk. Qualification barriers also benefit other incumbents. Pricing pressure and supply interruptions can weaken the economic benefit without eliminating switching friction.
Ce qui invaliderait la thèse
The thesis would be undermined by evidence that customers routinely replace qualified NXP components without material redesign or requalification, or by sustained losses of automotive programs and replacement designs attributable to competitive displacement rather than end-market demand.
Preuves (3) · Contre-preuves (4)

Évolution depuis la dernière analyse

  • Changed uncertain to narrow: the explicit automotive qualification and long-product-life disclosures, combined with NXP's design-in engineering activity and realized automotive sales, support an incumbent switching-cost advantage. The earlier conclusion understated this evidence.
  • Retained the distinction between demonstrated 2023 input-cost pass-through and 2026 margin improvement driven mainly by volume and mix.
  • Added assessments of actual capital returns, financing and purchase commitments, granted incentive awards, adopted clawback provisions and existing committee independence.

Limites de l’analyse

  • All supplied evidence is issuer disclosure. Qualification requirements describe a concrete operating mechanism, but customer-level replacement costs, program retention and competitive win rates are absent.
  • No supplied passage establishes a named entity as a direct competitor for the assessed advantage. Named joint-venture partners, acquisition targets, litigation counterparties and compensation peers cannot automatically be treated as competitors.
  • The switching-cost conclusion is strongest for automotive programs; the passages do not establish equivalent protection throughout the other end markets.
  • There is no current price-volume decomposition establishing whether the 2023 pass-through persisted through 2026. Margin recovery alone cannot demonstrate pricing power.
  • Acquisition valuations, expected synergies and future factory capacity do not demonstrate realized technological or cost advantages. Long-term capacity commitments also create utilization risk.
  • The proxy supplies compensation and governance evidence, but the passages do not establish executives' actual beneficial ownership or compliance with ownership requirements. Proposed 2026 appointments and remuneration changes are not treated as adopted.
  • The supplied proxy excerpt q593 contains a cash-flow presentation inconsistent with the annual filing's 2025 figures; the assessment uses filing-1 q80 instead.
  • Source dates are filing dates. The latest supplied operating period ends June 28, 2026; no later operating developments are established.

Indicateurs financiers à confronter à la thèse

Ratios calculés à partir des publications annuelles. Une valeur manquante reste indisponible. Les graphiques détaillés sont accessibles dans les autres onglets.

Indicateurs financiers à confronter à la thèse
PériodeGross marginOperating marginROICFCF margin
202154.8%23.3%15.6%20.9%
202256.9%28.8%21.6%21.4%
202356.9%27.6%19.7%20.2%
202456.4%27.1%16.9%16.3%
202554.7%24.8%13.4%19.7%

Pouvoir de fixation des prix44

  • Pricing outcomes

    NXP passed inflationary input costs to customers in 2023, with higher selling prices contributing 8.1% of revenue. This is demonstrated pricing action, but principally cost recovery; sustained pricing strength in later periods is unestablished.

  • Customer demand

    Assessed indirectly from automotive qualification, design integration and continuing operating demand. These support customer friction, while historical order modifications weaken revenue predictability. No customer retention rate is disclosed.

  • Margin resilience

    Gross margin held at 56.9% in 2022–2023 during cost pass-through, declined to 54.7% in 2025 from 56.4% in 2024, and recovered to 57.3% in Q2 2026. This is mixed resilience; the latest sequential improvement mainly reflects volume and mix.

  • Pricing freedom

    Disclosed discounts, price protection and distributor incentives constrain realized terms. NXP also discloses possible inability to collect cancellation fees on customized products. These limitations support a weak assessment, although contract-by-contract pricing discretion is unavailable.

Management63

  • Capital discipline

    Cash generation, actual shareholder returns and long-term share-count reduction are favorable. Against these, net debt rose during 2025 and substantial VSMC purchase obligations remain. Debt subsequently declined and a divestiture generated cash, but investment returns and acquisition outcomes remain unproven.

  • Incentive alignment

    Actual 2025 grants tie performance awards to three-year relative shareholder returns, alongside time-based RSUs. An adopted clawback policy provides additional alignment. Final performance vesting and actual executive ownership are not established.

  • Execution

    Operating results show recovery in first-half 2026 and disclosed execution of restructuring programs. However, 2025 performance missed expectations, and the first-quarter divestiture gain inflated reported operating income. This is an indirect assessment from operating outcomes rather than proof of competitive gains.

  • Governance

    Existing audit, compensation and governance committees are entirely independent; the company discloses no qualifying related-party transactions and has an adopted clawback policy. These demonstrate strong formal safeguards, without establishing exceptional effectiveness or assuming proposed board appointments occurred.

Sources et méthode

Publication courante · Mis à jour 19/10/2026 · Version 5

Interprétation IA fondée sur des extraits vérifiés. Les déclarations de l’entreprise et les limites de couverture restent explicites.

Méthode quality-scores-2 : six catégories de même poids. Le score global exige une couverture complète. Les données manquantes ne valent pas zéro. Les évaluations qualitatives sont des interprétations sourcées, pas des probabilités. 6/6 · 22/10/2026

Moat56

Equal-weight average of four evidence-backed rubric grades (0–4), scaled to 100.

structural advantage · 3/4 · Stringent qualification, reliability requirements and extensive design-in work create a concrete barrier around existing automotive programs. Actual automotive sales establish participation at scale; relative technological superiority is not established.

durability · 2/4 · Long automotive product cycles support program-level persistence, but protection through future platform selections is unproven. Historical price erosion and uncertain IP protection limit the durability assessment.

customer dependency · 2/4 · Qualification and engineering integration indicate switching friction indirectly. They do not prevent customers from changing order volumes, and customization can expose NXP to cancellation losses.

erosion resilience · 2/4 · Realized cost pass-through and subsequent operating recovery show some resilience, balanced against 2025 margin compression and actual supply constraints. Recovery does not establish resistance to competitive displacement.

Pouvoir de fixation des prix44

Equal-weight average of four evidence-backed rubric grades (0–4), scaled to 100.

realized pricing · 2/4 · NXP passed inflationary input costs to customers in 2023, with higher selling prices contributing 8.1% of revenue. This is demonstrated pricing action, but principally cost recovery; sustained pricing strength in later periods is unestablished.

retention · 2/4 · Assessed indirectly from automotive qualification, design integration and continuing operating demand. These support customer friction, while historical order modifications weaken revenue predictability. No customer retention rate is disclosed.

margin resilience · 2/4 · Gross margin held at 56.9% in 2022–2023 during cost pass-through, declined to 54.7% in 2025 from 56.4% in 2024, and recovered to 57.3% in Q2 2026. This is mixed resilience; the latest sequential improvement mainly reflects volume and mix.

contractual freedom · 1/4 · Disclosed discounts, price protection and distributor incentives constrain realized terms. NXP also discloses possible inability to collect cancellation fees on customized products. These limitations support a weak assessment, although contract-by-contract pricing discretion is unavailable.

Prévisibilité84

Five consecutive annual periods. Equal weights: nondeclining revenue frequency; revenue-growth volatility (5–40pp); positive FCF frequency; FCF-margin volatility (3–20pp). Stability indicator, not a growth forecast.

Nondeclining revenue years (%)
50.00
Revenue growth volatility (pp)
9.62
Positive FCF years (%)
100.00
FCF margin volatility (pp)
1.81

Solidité financière58

Equal-weight grades: debt/FCF (1–8x), net debt/earnings before interest and tax (0–5x), interest service (1–12x), current ratio (0.75–2x). Earnings use reported operating income, or reported pretax profit plus reported interest expense when operating income is unavailable. Interest service uses earnings/interest expense; if unavailable, it uses reported operating cash flow/cash interest paid, without relabeling cash paid as accrued expense. Nonpositive cash flow/earnings score 0 for their service component; reported zero interest with a positive numerator scores 100. Net cash scores 100 for net leverage. Missing disclosures remain unavailable. General nonfinancial-company rubric, not a credit rating; exceptional and nonoperating gains are not normalized out. IFRS finance-cost and cash-flow classifications retain their reported scope.

debtFcfGrade
42.23
netDebtEbitGrade
41.22
interestCoverageGrade
50.35
currentRatioGrade
100.00
Debt / FCF (x)
5.04
Net debt / operating income (x)
2.94
Interest coverage (x)
6.54
Current ratio (x)
2.05

Allocation du capital93

Three-year equal-weight indicators: pretax return on average invested capital (0–25%; equity + debt − cash, each year and its prior year), share-count growth (0–5%, lower better), share-based cost/revenue (2–20%, lower better), consolidated FCF/net income (0–1x). Return uses reported operating income or, if unavailable, EBIT calculated from reported pretax profit plus reported interest expense; exceptional/nonoperating gains are not normalized out. Share-based cost uses the reported cash-flow add-back or, if absent, separately reported recognized compensation expense; the latter never becomes an FCF adjustment. Nonpositive net income scores 0 for cash conversion; absent income/FCF stays unavailable. Nonpositive invested capital has no defined return and remains unavailable. Does not establish acquisition quality or buyback timing.

3-year pre-tax operating return (%)
20.18
3-year average dilution (%)
-1.18
3-year average SBC / revenue (%)
3.51
cashConversionGrade
97.76

Qualité du management63

Equal-weight average of four evidence-backed rubric grades (0–4), scaled to 100.

capital discipline · 2/4 · Cash generation, actual shareholder returns and long-term share-count reduction are favorable. Against these, net debt rose during 2025 and substantial VSMC purchase obligations remain. Debt subsequently declined and a divestiture generated cash, but investment returns and acquisition outcomes remain unproven.

incentive alignment · 3/4 · Actual 2025 grants tie performance awards to three-year relative shareholder returns, alongside time-based RSUs. An adopted clawback policy provides additional alignment. Final performance vesting and actual executive ownership are not established.

execution · 2/4 · Operating results show recovery in first-half 2026 and disclosed execution of restructuring programs. However, 2025 performance missed expectations, and the first-quarter divestiture gain inflated reported operating income. This is an indirect assessment from operating outcomes rather than proof of competitive gains.

governance · 3/4 · Existing audit, compensation and governance committees are entirely independent; the company discloses no qualifying related-party transactions and has an adopted clawback policy. These demonstrate strong formal safeguards, without establishing exceptional effectiveness or assuming proposed board appointments occurred.

Preuves

Due to the high degree of regulatory scrutiny and safety requirements, the automotive semiconductor market is characterized by stringent qualification processes, zero defect quality processes, functionally safe design architecture, high reliability, extensive design-in timeframes and long product life cycles, which results in significant barriers to entry.

Business / Automotive qualification requirements and barriers to entry · Dépôt 19/02/2026

We generate demand for our products by delivering product solutions to our customers, and supporting their system design-in activities by providing application architecture expertise and local field application engineering support.

Sales, Marketing and Customers / Design-in engineering support · Dépôt 19/02/2026

Revenue in the Automotive end market was $7,484 million, an increase of $605 million or 8.8% versus the year ago period.

MD&A / 2023 automotive revenue · Dépôt 22/02/2024

Such customers have in the past, and may in the future, vary order levels significantly from period to period, request postponements to scheduled delivery dates, modify their orders or reduce lead times.

Risk factors / Historical customer order changes · Dépôt 19/02/2026

If customers do not purchase products made specifically for them, we may not be able to resell such products to other customers or may not be able to require the customers who have ordered these products to pay a cancellation fee.

Risk factors / Customized products and cancellation fees · Dépôt 19/02/2026

The semiconductor industry is historically characterized by continued price erosion, especially after a product has been on the market.

Risk factors / Historical semiconductor price erosion · Dépôt 19/02/2026

For example, as part of the industry-wide shortage of semiconductors during 2022 we could not obtain sufficient silicon wafers from our foundry partners to meet the demand for our products, causing us not to fully supply the demand for our products, and negatively affecting our results of operations.

Risk factors / Realized 2022 foundry supply shortfall · Dépôt 19/02/2026

The higher average selling prices at 8.1% of revenues or the year-ended December 31, 2023, were a result of increased inflationary input costs from NXP suppliers which were passed along to end customers.

MD&A / Realized 2023 selling-price contribution and input-cost pass-through · Dépôt 22/02/2024

Our gross profit percentage for 2023 and 2022 remained flat at 56.9%, as both revenue and cost of revenue were impacted by inflationary effect of increased input costs which were passed along to end customers.

MD&A / 2022–2023 gross margin and inflation pass-through · Dépôt 22/02/2024

53 The following are reconciliations of our most comparable US GAAP measures to our non-GAAP measures presented: ($ in millions) Three months ended Full-year December 31, 2025 September 28, 2025 December 31, 2024 2025 2024 GAAP gross profit $ 1,807 $ 1,787 $ 1,678 $ 6,716 $ 7,119 PPA effects (7) (6) (11) (28) (47) Restructuring (14) — (21) (79) (28) Share-based compensation (14) (15) (15) (59) (59) Other incidentals (71) (2) (64) (84) (79) Non-GAAP gross profit $ 1,913 $ 1,810 $ 1,789 $ 6,966 $ 7,332 GAAP Gross Margin 54.2 % 56.3 % 53.9 % 54.7 % 56.4 % Non-GAAP Gross Margin 57.4 % 57.0 % 57.5 % 56.8 % 58.1 % GAAP research and development $ (665) $ (575) $ (612) $ (2,360) $ (2,347) Restructuring (89) (1) (50) (100) (57) Share-based compensation (58) (57) (60) (237) (234) Other incidentals (4) (2) (5) (14) (6) Non-GAAP research and development $ (514) $ (515) $ (497) $ (2,009) $ (2,050) GAAP selling, general and administrative $ (359) $ (286) $ (323) $ (1,204) $ (1,164) PPA effects — (1) — (1) (2) Restructuring (74) (2) (41) (82) (40) Share-based compensation (28) (46) (42) (166) (168) Other incidentals (15) (14) (12) (64) (45) Non-GAAP selling, general and administrative $ (242) $ (223) $ (228) $ (891) $ (909) GAAP operating income (loss) $ 744 $ 893 $ 675 $ 3,047 $ 3,417 PPA effects (41) (38) (39) (151) (185) Restructuring (177) (3) (112) (261) (125) Share-based compensation (100) (118) (117) (462) (461) Other incidentals (92) (19) (122) (143) (181) Non-GAAP operating income (loss) $ 1,154 $ 1,071 $ 1,065 $ 4,064 $ 4,369 GAAP Operating Margin 22.3 % 28.1 % 21.7 % 24.8 % 27.1 % Non-GAAP Operating Margin 34.6 % 33.8 % 34.2 % 33.1 % 34.6 % GAAP Income tax benefit (provision) $ (131) $ (148) $ (77) $ (525) $ (545) Income tax effect 59 25 87 129 141 Non-GAAP Income tax benefit (provision) $ (190) $ (173) $ (164) $ (654) $ (686) ($ in millions) Three months ended Full-year December 31, 2025 September 28, 2025 December 31, 2024 2025 2024 Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities $ 891 $ 585 $ 391 $ 2,820 $ 2,782 Net capital expenditures on property, plant and equipment (98) (76) (99) (395) (693) Non-GAAP free cash flow $ 793 $ 509 $ 292 $ 2,425 $ 2,089 54 ($ in millions) Three months ended Full-year December 31, 2025 September 28, 2025 December 31, 2024 2025 2024 Long-term debt $ 10,972 $ 10,971 $ 10,354 $ 10,972 $ 10,354 Short-term debt 1,250 1,264 500 1,250 500 Total debt 12,222 12,235 10,854 12,222 10,854 Less: cash and cash equivalents (3,267) (3,454) (3,292) (3,267) (3,292) Less: short-term deposits — (500) — — — Net debt $ 8,955 $ 8,281 $ 7,562 $ 8,955 $ 7,562 55 Item 7A.

MD&A / 2024–2025 GAAP and non-GAAP results, cash flow and debt · Dépôt 19/02/2026

Our gross profit percentage for the three months ended June 28, 2026, of 57.3% increased compared to 56.2% for the three months ended March 29, 2026, driven mainly by higher sales volumes and favorable product mix.

MD&A / Q2 2026 gross-margin improvement attributed to volume and mix · Dépôt 28/07/2026

22 Results of operations The following table presents operating results for each of the three- and six-month periods ended June 28, 2026, and June 29, 2025, respectively: ($ in millions, unless otherwise stated) Q2 2026 % of Revenue Q2 2025 % of Revenue YTD 2026 % of Revenue YTD 2025 % of Revenue Revenue 3,496 2,926 6,677 5,761 % nominal growth 19.5 (6.4) 15.9 (7.9) Gross profit 2,002 1,562 3,790 3,122 Gross margin 57.3 % 53.4 % 56.8 % 54.2 % Research and development (604) 17.3 % (573) 19.6 % (1,192) 17.9 % (1,120) 19.4 % Selling, general and administrative (291) 8.3 % (278) 9.5 % (575) 8.6 % (559) 9.7 % Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets (31) 0.9 % (25) 0.9 % (63) 0.9 % (52) 0.9 % Other income (expense) (5) 0.1 % 1 — % 616 9.2 % 19 0.3 % Operating income (loss) 1,071 30.6 % 687 23.5 % 2,576 38.6 % 1,410 24.5 % Financial income (expense) (97) 2.8 % (86) 2.9 % (193) 2.9 % (178) 3.1 % Benefit (provision) for income taxes (189) 5.4 % (116) 4.0 % (461) 6.9 % (246) 4.3 % Results relating to equity-accounted investees (3) 0.1 % (28) 1.0 % (7) 0.1 % (32) 0.6 % Net income (loss) 782 22.4 % 457 15.6 % 1,915 28.7 % 954 16.6 % Less: Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests 15 0.4 % 12 0.4 % 26 0.4 % 19 0.3 % Net income (loss) attributable to stockholders 767 21.9 % 445 15.2 % 1,889 28.3 % 935 16.2 % Diluted earnings per share 3.02 1.75 7.44 3.67 23 Revenue Q2 2026 Overview Q2 2026 compared to Q2 2025 Revenue for the three months ended June 28, 2026, was $3,496 million compared to $2,926 million for the three months ended June 29, 2025, an increase of $570 million or 19.5%, in line with management’s expectations.

MD&A / Q2 and first-half 2026 operating results · Dépôt 28/07/2026

Variable consideration is estimated and includes the impact of discounts, price protection, product returns and distributor incentive programs.

Revenue recognition / Discounts, price protection, returns and distributor incentives · Dépôt 19/02/2026

•During 2025, NXP returned capital to shareholders with the payment of $1,025 million in cash dividends and the repurchase of $899 million of its common shares, for a total capital return of $1,924 million.

Year in Focus / Actual 2025 dividends and repurchases · Dépôt 19/02/2026

In addition, NXP has an agreed purchase commitment with VSMC that over the lifetime of the factory the minimal loading will be between 80% - 90%, resulting in a total purchase commitment of approximately $14,096 million that is expected to be purchased over 37 years once wafer production starts.

Commitments / VSMC minimum loading and lifetime purchase obligation · Dépôt 19/02/2026

Since 2016, the Company has returned $22.7 billion to shareholders through previously announced share repurchases and dividend payments, reducing our diluted share count by approximately 27 percent, or 93.3 million shares

Share repurchases / Historical capital returns and diluted share-count reduction · Dépôt 27/04/2026

The following are reconciliations of our most comparable US GAAP measures to our non-GAAP measures presented: ($ in millions) For the three months ended June 28, 2026 March 29, 2026 June 29, 2025 GAAP gross profit $ 2,002 $ 1,788 $ 1,562 PPA effects (5) (6) (7) Restructuring — 1 (61) Share-based compensation (12) (13) (14) Other incidentals (9) (9) (8) Non-GAAP gross profit $ 2,028 $ 1,815 $ 1,652 GAAP Gross Margin 57.3 % 56.2 % 53.4 % Non-GAAP Gross Margin 58.0 % 57.1 % 56.5 % GAAP research and development $ (604) $ (588) $ (573) Restructuring 4 (2) (3) Share-based compensation (54) (57) (58) Other incidentals (4) (11) (7) Non-GAAP research and development $ (550) $ (518) $ (505) GAAP selling, general and administrative $ (291) $ (284) $ (278) Restructuring 4 (1) (3) Share-based compensation (39) (39) (45) Other incidentals (12) (4) (15) Non-GAAP selling, general and administrative $ (244) $ (240) $ (215) GAAP operating income (loss) $ 1,071 $ 1,505 $ 687 34 ($ in millions) For the three months ended June 28, 2026 March 29, 2026 June 29, 2025 GAAP operating income (loss) $ 1,071 $ 1,505 $ 687 PPA effects (36) (38) (32) Restructuring 8 (2) (67) Share-based compensation (105) (109) (117) Other incidentals (i) (24) 602 (32) Non-GAAP operating income (loss) $ 1,228 $ 1,052 $ 935 GAAP Operating Margin 30.6 % 47.3 % 23.5 % Non-GAAP Operating Margin 35.1 % 33.1 % 32.0 % GAAP Income tax benefit (provision) $ (189) $ (272) $ (116) Income tax effect 16 (99) 32 Non-GAAP Income tax benefit (provision) $ (205) $ (173) $ (148) (i) For the three months ended March 29, 2026, Other Incidentals includes the gain on sale of the MEMS Sensors business ($ in millions) For the three months ended June 28, 2026 March 29, 2026 June 29, 2025 Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities $ 860 $ 793 $ 779 Net capital expenditures on property, plant and equipment (69) (79) (83) Non-GAAP free cash flow $ 791 $ 714 $ 696 ($ in millions) For the three months ended June 28, 2026 March 29, 2026 June 29, 2025 Long-term debt $ 9,977 $ 10,974 $ 9,479 Short-term debt 999 750 1,999 Total debt 10,976 11,724 11,478 Less: cash and cash equivalents (3,222) (3,708) (3,170) Net debt $ 7,754 $ 8,016 $ 8,308 35 Item 3.

MD&A / Q2 2026 reconciliations, operating cash flow and debt · Dépôt 28/07/2026

Performance-based contingent on NXP’s relative total shareholder return performance against the Peer Group with a vesting range of 0 – 200% (capped) RSUs 30% 1/3rd per year on each anniversary of the grant date Time-based PSUs: For all grants made under our 2025 LTI program, the number of shares earned will be contingent upon NXP’s relative total shareholder return ("RTSR") performance versus the Peer Group from October 28, 2025, through October 27, 2028.

Executive compensation / Granted 2025 relative-TSR performance awards and time-based RSUs · Dépôt 27/04/2026

Clawback Policy In 2023, NXP adopted a Dodd-Frank compliant Clawback Policy.

Executive compensation / Adopted 2023 clawback policy · Dépôt 27/04/2026

Under this policy the Company is entitled to recover, in full or in part, any incentive-based compensation erroneously awarded to any person who served as an executive officer after an accounting restatement.

Executive compensation / Recovery of erroneously awarded incentive compensation · Dépôt 27/04/2026

All members of the Audit, Human Resources and Compensation, and Nominating, Governance and Sustainability Committees are independent directors, as defined in the applicable Nasdaq listing standards, applicable SEC rules and the Rules of Procedure, which includes the requirements of the DCGC.

Board governance / Actual committee independence · Dépôt 27/04/2026

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS Related Party Transactions There were no transactions or series of similar transactions, since January 1, 2025, to which we were a party or will be a party other than compensation arrangements which are described under “Executive Compensation,” in which: •the amount involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000; and •a director or director nominee, executive officer, holder of more than 5% of our ordinary shares or any immediate family member of a director, director nominee or executive officer had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

Related Party Transactions / Disclosed absence of qualifying transactions · Dépôt 27/04/2026

Pay-for-Performance Alignment While the Company made important progress against several strategic priorities during the year, overall financial performance declined on a year‑over‑year basis and did not meet our expectations.

Executive compensation / 2025 financial performance below expectations · Dépôt 27/04/2026

During the first six months ended June 28, 2026, the restructuring provision decreased by $94 million, primarily reflecting the execution of previously announced involuntary restructuring programs of $85 million and a release for earlier programs of $9 million.

Restructuring / Execution of previously announced programs in first-half 2026 · Dépôt 28/07/2026

On February 2, 2026, we completed the sale of our MEMS Sensors business, resulting in cash proceeds of $878 million at closing and a gain on sale of $627 million recorded in Other income (expense).

Quarterly highlights / Completed MEMS Sensors divestiture and gain · Dépôt 28/04/2026

We may have difficulty obtaining patents and other intellectual property rights to protect our proprietary products, technology and intellectual property, and the patents and other intellectual property rights we receive may be insufficient to provide us with meaningful protection or commercial advantage.

Risk factors / Uncertain commercial protection from intellectual property · Dépôt 19/02/2026

Historique des publications

Historique des publications
VersionMis à jourAvantage concurrentiel
522/10/2026narrow
419/10/2026narrow
318/10/2026uncertain
218/10/2026uncertain
118/10/2026Indisponible

Sources

Méthode et limites de l’analyse · Comprendre ce concept