Skip to content

Equifax

NYSE: EFX · USD

Equifax (EFX) Economic Moat Analysis56

Competitive advantages, dated evidence and erosion risks.

Narrow economic moat

Equifax’s accumulated payroll data and exclusive NCTUE operating rights support a narrow moat in information assets. Record growth and verification demand demonstrate current usefulness; network effects and substantial switching costs remain unproven. Pricing power is mixed: mortgage pricing supported growth, but historical unit-price declines, customer termination rights and royalties constrain discretion. Third-quarter results strengthen evidence of operating resilience, partly benefiting from prior-year restructuring charges. Data-quality settlement costs and unresolved regulatory scrutiny remain material offsets. The supplied disclosures also establish that the shareholder special-meeting reform was adopted.

Intangible assets

The Work Number’s accumulated payroll records and contributor base, together with exclusive NCTUE operating rights, provide differentiated information assets. The disclosed employment-status indicator illustrates their application, although its exclusivity and customer benefits are issuer claims.

Durability
An expanding payroll database and millions of contributing employers support persistence. NCTUE exclusivity provides explicit protection, but its duration is undisclosed. These facts establish a current advantage without demonstrating exceptional durability or a self-reinforcing network effect.
Competitors
Experian, Thomas & Company
Erosion risks
Verification services have disclosed low entry barriers and direct employer alternatives. Historical unit-price declines, customer termination rights, licensed-input dependence, the coding-issue settlement and unresolved Workforce Solutions investigation constrain protection and monetization.
What would invalidate the thesis
The assessment would weaken if payroll coverage or contributor participation persistently contracted, NCTUE exclusivity ended, alternatives matched coverage at materially lower prices, or data-quality restrictions impaired commercial use. Sustained verification demand deterioration accompanied by price concessions would challenge the advantage.
Evidence (7) · Counterevidence (8)

Changes since the previous analysis

  • Narrow moat retained after reassessing the current catalog; data assets remain the evidenced mechanism, while material switching costs and network effects remain unproven.
  • Updated operating and capital-allocation assessment through September 30, 2026. Nine-month operating margin improved, but operating cash flow remained approximately flat and prior-year restructuring affected the quarterly comparison.
  • Replaced the earlier description of special-meeting reform as merely proposed: June 16, 2026 amendments adopted a 25% voting-power threshold with a one-year ownership requirement and procedural conditions.
  • Added actual executive ownership-policy compliance and performance-share vesting, government wins and renewals, the coding-issue settlement charge, and the pending acquisition commitment. These additions do not warrant higher criterion grades.

Evidence limitations

  • Assessment uses only supplied passages. Source dates are filing dates (dateKind: filed), not independently established publication or retrieval dates.
  • Experian and Thomas & Company are explicitly named in the filing dated February 22, 2024. Later competition passages disclose generic categories; continued named-competitor coverage and relative database economics are not established.
  • Database counts and exclusivity are specific issuer disclosures. Claimed product uniqueness, security superiority and AI competitive advantages lack comparative customer-outcome evidence; patents pending are not granted protection.
  • No cohort retention, renewal rate, quantified switching cost, NCTUE exclusivity duration or broad contractual price-escalation rights are supplied. Contract wins and renewals combine distinct sources of demand.
  • Mortgage growth attributed to pricing and volume does not isolate their respective contributions. The $1 score offering establishes an offered price, without demonstrating its realized sales mix or profitability.
  • The CFPB investigation remains unresolved. The coding-issue settlement charge is a disclosed adverse outcome and is assessed separately; neither establishes the outcome of the other matter.
  • The acquisition remained expected to close in the fourth quarter as of the October 20, 2026 filing. Its enterprise value is a documented commitment, not demonstrated acquisition returns.

Financial indicators to test against the thesis

Calculated from annual filings. Missing data remains unavailable. Detailed financial charts remain in the other topics.

Financial indicators to test against the thesis
PeriodGross marginOperating marginROICFCF margin
202159.8%23.1%12.3%17.6%
202257.5%20.6%8.8%2.6%
202355.7%17.7%7.4%9.8%
202455.7%18.3%7.9%14.3%
202556.4%18.0%8.5%18.7%

Pricing power44

  • Pricing outcomes

    Management attributes first-half mortgage growth partly to product pricing and partly to higher volumes, supporting a positive pricing contribution without isolating its size. Historical per-unit declines in certain key products establish adverse outcomes elsewhere. The $1 mortgage-score offer documents price positioning, but its realized sales impact is undisclosed.

  • Customer demand

    Long-standing relationships, verification revenue growth and disclosed government renewals support repeat demand. This assessment uses indirect operating evidence and an aggregate of wins and renewals, not a retention rate. Customer convenience-termination rights and the absence of a renewal breakdown prevent a stronger conclusion.

  • Margin resilience

    Nine-month consolidated operating margin improved to 19.0% from 17.9%, reversing first-half compression. However, the quarterly comparison benefits from a $43.9 million prior-year restructuring charge. First-half USIS royalty pressure and the coding-issue settlement show imperfect cost protection. These outcomes support mixed resilience without inferring a moat from margin levels.

  • Pricing freedom

    Many material customers may terminate for convenience on limited notice, creating an explicit renegotiation mechanism. Significant licensed-input dependence and fixed renewal terms further constrain discretion. The disclosed $1 score offering shows some price-setting ability, but protected escalators or broad unilateral repricing rights are not established.

Management50

  • Capital discipline

    Nine-month operating cash flow of $1,142.1 million less $378.9 million cash capital expenditure left $763.2 million; buybacks and dividends consumed $851.4 million. Net debt proceeds were $116.9 million before issuance costs. Cash generation remained approximately flat. Cloud-investment returns and the pending $750 million acquisition’s returns are unproven, supporting a mixed assessment.

  • Incentive alignment

    Disclosed ownership requirements and actual compliance, three-year relative TSR awards, a negative-TSR payout cap and actual performance-share vesting support alignment. Adjusted EBITDA measures and the 2026 incentive-revenue adjustment insulating leaders from score-price differences complicate that conclusion. Adopted arrangements and completed vesting are distinguished from future performance.

  • Execution

    Record expansion, government wins and renewals, and nine-month revenue growth of 11% demonstrate operating progress. Operating income also increased, although prior-year restructuring improves the comparison. Approximately flat operating cash flow and the coding-issue settlement temper execution quality. Government contracts principally benefiting 2027 onward do not yet establish realized revenue.

  • Governance

    Independent standing committees, recurring cybersecurity oversight, an unqualified financial-reporting control opinion and adopted special-meeting reform support functioning governance. The 25% threshold retains a one-year ownership condition. The coding-issue settlement warrants scrutiny; unresolved CFPB proceedings do not establish misconduct. Financial-reporting control assurance does not establish effective product-data controls.

Sources and methodology

Current publication · Updated 21/10/2026 · Version 8

AI interpretation based on checked source excerpts. Issuer assertions and evidence limitations remain explicit.

Policy quality-scores-3: six equally weighted categories. The overall score requires full coverage. Missing inputs are not zero. Qualitative grades are sourced interpretations, not probabilities. 6/6 · 28/10/2026

Moat56

Equal-weight average of four evidence-backed rubric grades (0–4), scaled to 100.

structural advantage · 3/4 · Payroll-record scale, approximately 4.9 million contributing employers and explicit NCTUE operating exclusivity establish a meaningful current information-asset advantage. The employment-status indicator illustrates a commercial application. Comparative superiority and the claim that only Equifax can deliver that product remain issuer assertions; network effects are not demonstrated.

durability · 2/4 · Record growth and contributor relationships support persistence, while exclusive NCTUE rights provide a contractual barrier. Their duration is absent. Low verification entry barriers, direct employer alternatives, terminable customer contracts and periodically renewed licensed inputs limit confidence in a long protection period.

customer dependency · 2/4 · Long-standing relationships, workflow-specific employment information and Verification Services growth support continuing usefulness. Government wins and renewals provide additional demand evidence, although they are bundled and principally benefit future periods. Dependency is assessed indirectly: termination rights remain broad, and migration costs or customer reliance on an irreplaceable service are not quantified.

erosion resilience · 2/4 · Database expansion, verification growth and third-quarter revenue growth show that competitive pressure has not eliminated demand. Historical unit-price declines and low entry barriers remain offsets. The coding-issue settlement demonstrates an actual quality-related economic cost; the separate CFPB investigation remains unresolved rather than evidence of an established violation.

Pricing power44

Equal-weight average of four evidence-backed rubric grades (0–4), scaled to 100.

realized pricing · 2/4 · Management attributes first-half mortgage growth partly to product pricing and partly to higher volumes, supporting a positive pricing contribution without isolating its size. Historical per-unit declines in certain key products establish adverse outcomes elsewhere. The $1 mortgage-score offer documents price positioning, but its realized sales impact is undisclosed.

retention · 2/4 · Long-standing relationships, verification revenue growth and disclosed government renewals support repeat demand. This assessment uses indirect operating evidence and an aggregate of wins and renewals, not a retention rate. Customer convenience-termination rights and the absence of a renewal breakdown prevent a stronger conclusion.

margin resilience · 2/4 · Nine-month consolidated operating margin improved to 19.0% from 17.9%, reversing first-half compression. However, the quarterly comparison benefits from a $43.9 million prior-year restructuring charge. First-half USIS royalty pressure and the coding-issue settlement show imperfect cost protection. These outcomes support mixed resilience without inferring a moat from margin levels.

contractual freedom · 1/4 · Many material customers may terminate for convenience on limited notice, creating an explicit renegotiation mechanism. Significant licensed-input dependence and fixed renewal terms further constrain discretion. The disclosed $1 score offering shows some price-setting ability, but protected escalators or broad unilateral repricing rights are not established.

Predictability96

5 consecutive published annual periods. Equal weights: nondeclining revenue frequency; revenue-growth volatility (5–40pp); positive FCF frequency; FCF-margin volatility (3–20pp). Stability indicator, not a growth forecast.

Nondeclining revenue years (%)
100.00
Revenue growth volatility (pp)
2.08
Positive FCF years (%)
100.00
FCF margin volatility (pp)
5.88
observedAnnualPeriods
5.00

Financial strength25

Equal-weight grades: debt/FCF (1–8x), net debt/earnings before interest and tax (0–5x), interest service (1–12x), current ratio (0.75–2x). Earnings use reported operating income, an original issuer-reported unadjusted EBIT reconciled to net income, income tax and signed net interest, or reported pretax profit plus reported gross interest expense. Reported EBIT is distinct from GAAP operating income and gross interest. Interest service uses earnings/interest expense; if unavailable, it uses reported operating cash flow/cash interest paid, without relabeling cash paid as accrued expense. Nonpositive cash flow/earnings score 0 for their service component; reported zero interest with a positive numerator scores 100. Net cash scores 100 for net leverage. Missing disclosures remain unavailable. General nonfinancial-company rubric, not a credit rating; exceptional and nonoperating gains are not normalized out. IFRS finance-cost and cash-flow classifications retain their reported scope.

debtFcfGrade
50.14
netDebtEbitGrade
10.29
interestCoverageGrade
37.81
currentRatioGrade
0.00
Debt / FCF (x)
4.49
Net debt / operating income (x)
4.49
Interest coverage (x)
5.16
Current ratio (x)
0.60

Capital allocation84

Three-year equal-weight indicators: pretax return on average invested capital (0–25%; equity + debt − cash, each year and its prior year), share-count growth (0–5%, lower better), share-based cost/revenue (2–20%, lower better), consolidated FCF/net income (0–1x). Return uses reported operating income, an original issuer-reported unadjusted EBIT reconciled to net income, income tax and signed net interest, or EBIT calculated from reported pretax profit plus reported gross interest expense; the issuer-reported EBIT is distinct from GAAP operating income and gross interest; exceptional/nonoperating gains are not normalized out. Share-based cost uses the reported cash-flow add-back or, if absent, separately reported recognized compensation expense; the latter never becomes an FCF adjustment. Nonpositive net income scores 0 for cash conversion; absent income/FCF stays unavailable. ROIC remains undefined for nonpositive invested capital; the explicit asset-return alternative does not change the ROIC chart. Missing financial inputs alone never trigger an alternative. Does not establish acquisition quality or buyback timing.

3-year pre-tax operating return (%)
10.52
3-year average dilution (%)
0.22
3-year average SBC / revenue (%)
1.36
cashConversionGrade
100.00

Management50

Equal-weight average of four evidence-backed rubric grades (0–4), scaled to 100.

capital discipline · 2/4 · Nine-month operating cash flow of $1,142.1 million less $378.9 million cash capital expenditure left $763.2 million; buybacks and dividends consumed $851.4 million. Net debt proceeds were $116.9 million before issuance costs. Cash generation remained approximately flat. Cloud-investment returns and the pending $750 million acquisition’s returns are unproven, supporting a mixed assessment.

incentive alignment · 2/4 · Disclosed ownership requirements and actual compliance, three-year relative TSR awards, a negative-TSR payout cap and actual performance-share vesting support alignment. Adjusted EBITDA measures and the 2026 incentive-revenue adjustment insulating leaders from score-price differences complicate that conclusion. Adopted arrangements and completed vesting are distinguished from future performance.

execution · 2/4 · Record expansion, government wins and renewals, and nine-month revenue growth of 11% demonstrate operating progress. Operating income also increased, although prior-year restructuring improves the comparison. Approximately flat operating cash flow and the coding-issue settlement temper execution quality. Government contracts principally benefiting 2027 onward do not yet establish realized revenue.

governance · 2/4 · Independent standing committees, recurring cybersecurity oversight, an unqualified financial-reporting control opinion and adopted special-meeting reform support functioning governance. The 25% threshold retains a one-year ownership condition. The coding-issue settlement warrants scrutiny; unresolved CFPB proceedings do not establish misconduct. Financial-reporting control assurance does not establish effective product-data controls.

Evidence

Jeremypreviously served as Managing Director of Mandiant,part of Google Cloud, where he led hundredsof cyber engagements for Fortune 100 and 500companies with a focus on mitigating emergingthreats, scaling security operations throughautomation and AI, and enhancing cyber resilience.The Work Number database reached 209 millionactive records, up 11% from 2024, with over 800million total records.

2026 proxy, filed 2026-03-27: The Work Number record scale and growth · Filed 27/03/2026

We now have approximately4.9 million employers contributing payroll recordsto The Work Number database, and signed 16 newpartnership agreements that will drive additionalrecord growth in 2026.Our Security maturity level has outperformedall major industry benchmarks for the last sixyears, with a 2025 National Institute of StandardsTechnology (NIST) Cybersecurity Framework (CSF)score of 4.4 – an increase from last year’s score of 4.3.We were recognized in the TIME Magazinelist of America’s Best Midsize Companies fororganizations based in the U.S.

2026 proxy, filed 2026-03-27: payroll contributors and signed partnerships · Filed 27/03/2026

Equifax Industry Knowledge. Equifax has exclusive rights to operate and manage the NCTUE database of more than 430 million telecommunications, pay TV, internet, home security and utility account records.

2026 proxy, filed 2026-03-27: exclusive NCTUE operating rights · Filed 27/03/2026

6 2026 Proxy Statement Table of Contents Accelerate Innovation and New ProductsThe Work Number Report IndicatorThe Work Number Report Indicator empowersmortgage lenders by delivering a first-inmarketEquifax credit report with an indicatorof employment status earlier in the mortgagequalification process that only Equifax can deliver.The solution notifies mortgage lenders upfrontif an applicant has a verification of income andemployment (VOIE) record on The Work Numberdatabase.

2026 proxy, filed 2026-03-27: The Work Number Report Indicator · Filed 27/03/2026

•Competition in the Verification Services business is highly competitive with low barriers to entry and includes employers who manage verifications in-house, lenders who obtain verifications directly from employers, and numerous online and offline firms that provide verification services.

2025 Form 10-K, filed 2026-02-19: Verification Services competition · Filed 19/02/2026

Historically, certain of our key products have experienced declines in per unit pricing due to competitive factors and customer demand.

2025 Form 10-K, filed 2026-02-19: historical per-unit pricing declines · Filed 19/02/2026

We have long-standing relationships with a number of our customers and business partners, many of whom could unilaterally terminate their relationship with us or materially reduce the amount of business they conduct with us at any time.

2025 Form 10-K, filed 2026-02-19: long-standing customer and partner relationships · Filed 19/02/2026

Many of our material customer agreements can be terminated by the customer for convenience on limited advance written notice, which provides our customers with the opportunity to renegotiate their contracts with us or to award more business to our competitors.

2025 Form 10-K, filed 2026-02-19: customer termination and renegotiation rights · Filed 19/02/2026

In addition, a significant portion of our revenue is derived from products and services that incorporate intellectual property licensed from key business partners.

2025 Form 10-K, filed 2026-02-19: licensed intellectual-property dependence · Filed 19/02/2026

Our existing license agreements have fixed terms and are subject to periodic renewal.

2025 Form 10-K, filed 2026-02-19: fixed license terms and periodic renewal · Filed 19/02/2026

and key International segments of Australia, Canada and the U.K., includes employers who manage verifications in-house, lenders who obtain verifications directly from employers, and other online and offline verification companies, such as Experian, Thomas & Company and niche providers.

2023 Form 10-K, filed 2024-02-22: named verification competitors; continuation of geographic scope · Filed 22/02/2024

Segment Financial Results Workforce Solutions Three Months Ended June 30, Change Six Months Ended June 30, Change Workforce Solutions 2026 2025 $ % 2026 2025 $ % (In millions) (In millions) Operating revenue: Verification Services $ 607.6 $ 567.1 $ 40.5 7 % $ 1,179.0 $ 1,069.3 $ 109.7 10 % Employer Services 97.8 95.0 2.8 3 % 209.5 211.4 (1.9) (1) % Total operating revenue $ 705.4 $ 662.1 $ 43.3 7 % $ 1,388.5 $ 1,280.7 $ 107.8 8 % % of consolidated revenue 41 % 43 % 41 % 43 % Total operating income $ 316.7 $ 307.3 $ 9.4 3 % $ 626.0 $ 571.4 $ 54.6 10 % Operating margin 44.9 % 46.4 % (1.5) pts 45.1 % 44.6 % 0.5 pts Workforce Solutions revenue increased by 7% and 8% for the second quarter and first six months of 2026, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2025.

June 2026 Form 10-Q, filed 2026-07-21: Workforce Solutions revenue and margins · Filed 21/07/2026

The increase for both periods is due to growth in Online Information Solutions, which is due to growth in mortgage revenue, primarily due to product pricing and higher volumes, as well as growth in diversified markets revenue.

June 2026 Form 10-Q, filed 2026-07-21: mortgage product pricing and volume contribution · Filed 21/07/2026

USIS Operating Margin USIS operating margin decreased to 22.5% for the second quarter of 2026 from 22.6% for the second quarter of 2025 and decreased to 21.4% for the first six months of 2026 from 21.9% for the first six months of 2025.

June 2026 Form 10-Q, filed 2026-07-21: USIS operating-margin comparisons · Filed 21/07/2026

The margin decrease for both periods is primarily due to an increase in mortgage related royalty costs, partially offset by the aforementioned increases in revenue.

June 2026 Form 10-Q, filed 2026-07-21: mortgage royalty-cost pressure · Filed 21/07/2026

The key performance indicators for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025 were as follows: Key Performance Indicators Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, 2026 2025 2026 2025 (In millions, except per share data) Operating revenue $ 1,692.5 $ 1,544.9 $ 5,041.5 $ 4,523.9 Operating revenue change 10 % 7 % 11 % 6 % Operating income $ 355.3 $ 264.3 $ 957.2 $ 811.0 Operating margin 21.0 % 17.1 % 19.0 % 17.9 % Net income attributable to Equifax $ 211.7 $ 160.2 $ 567.1 $ 484.5 Diluted earnings per share $ 1.79 $ 1.29 $ 4.75 $ 3.89 Cash provided by operating activities $ 560.4 $ 559.9 $ 1,142.1 $ 1,144.9 Capital expenditures* $ (127.2) $ (125.8) $ (373.7) $ (349.1) *Amounts include accruals for capital expenditures.

September 2026 Form 10-Q, filed 2026-10-20: quarterly and nine-month operating indicators · Filed 20/10/2026

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2026 2025 (In millions) Operating activities: Consolidated net income $ 571.8 $ 487.9 Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 572.6 540.8 Stock-based compensation expense 74.5 63.9 Deferred income taxes 73.5 29.6 Gain on sale of equity investment — (0.8) Changes in assets and liabilities, excluding effects of acquisitions: Accounts receivable, net (91.7) (45.6) Other assets, current and long-term (95.7) (10.3) Current and long term liabilities, excluding debt 37.1 79.4 Cash provided by operating activities 1,142.1 1,144.9 Investing activities: Capital expenditures (378.9) (351.4) Cash received from divestitures — 0.8 Cash used in investing activities (378.9) (350.6) Financing activities: Net short-term payments (604.8) (204.1) Payments on long-term debt (276.4) — Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt 998.1 1.7 Treasury stock purchases (652.0) (427.4) Payment of share repurchase excise tax (8.3) — Dividends paid to Equifax shareholders (199.4) (172.0) Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests (5.6) (6.2) Proceeds from exercise of stock options and employee stock purchase plan 23.8 38.1 Payment of taxes related to settlement of equity awards (15.7) (13.6) Debt issuance costs (7.9) — Cash used in financing activities (748.2) (783.5) Effect of foreign currency exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents (2.9)

September 2026 Form 10-Q, filed 2026-10-20: nine-month cash flows, capital expenditure and financing · Filed 20/10/2026

The Workforce Solutions Government team continues to execute well, signing new contract wins and renewals totaling about $300 million in annual contract value in the first half of 2026 that will principally benefit 2027 and beyond.

Second-quarter earnings release, filed 2026-07-21: government contract wins and renewals · Filed 21/07/2026

12 (8)During the second quarter of 2026, we recorded an accrual of $100.0 million, which, net of expected insurance proceeds of $60.0 million, resulted in a charge of $40.0 million ($30.2 million, net of tax), for a legal settlement associated with the resolution of claims related to a previously-disclosed coding issue.

Second-quarter earnings release, filed 2026-07-21: coding-issue settlement accrual and insurance offset · Filed 21/07/2026

In July 2023, we received a Civil Investigative Demand (a “CID”) from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”) as part of its investigation into data accuracy and dispute handling at our Workforce Solutions business unit in order to determine whether we have followed the Fair Credit Reporting Act's requirements.

September 2026 Form 10-Q, filed 2026-10-20: Workforce Solutions CFPB investigation · Filed 20/10/2026

At this time, we are unable to predict the outcome of the CFPB's investigation, including whether the investigation will result in any actions or proceedings against us.

September 2026 Form 10-Q, filed 2026-10-20: investigation outcome remains uncertain · Filed 20/10/2026

(7)During the third quarter of 2025, we recorded $43.9 million ($32.8 million, net of tax) of restructuring charges for the realignment of resources and other costs, which predominantly related to the reduction of headcount to support the Company's global strategic objectives.

Third-quarter earnings release, filed 2026-10-20: prior-year restructuring charge affecting comparison · Filed 20/10/2026

As such, we maintain a formal stock ownership policy, under which our CEO and our other senior executives are required to acquire and hold Equifax common stock with a market value of six times base salary and three times base salary, respectively, within five years of assuming their respective positions.

2026 proxy, filed 2026-03-27: executive stock ownership requirements · Filed 27/03/2026

As of the most recent annual measurement date, all of our executive officers were in compliance with our stock ownership requirements.

2026 proxy, filed 2026-03-27: executive compliance with ownership requirements · Filed 27/03/2026

market-based and operational performance Financial Performance Metrics • Performance shares tied to three-year cumulative TSR measuring our stock performance relative to companies in the S&P 500, providing a broad index for comparison and alignment with shareholder investment choices

2026 proxy, filed 2026-03-27: relative three-year TSR performance shares · Filed 27/03/2026

– If our cumulative three-year TSR is negative, the payout is capped at target (100%), regardless of our relative TSR percentile ranking • Performance shares tied to Adjusted EBITDA are earned based on our Adjusted EBITDA performance over a three-year period3

2026 proxy, filed 2026-03-27: negative-TSR payout cap and adjusted EBITDA performance period · Filed 27/03/2026

– If we fail to meet our threshold Adjusted EBITDA goals for any year during the three-year performance period, the payout for that year will be $0 Payouts Align With Performance TSR and Adjusted EBITDA performance shares granted in 2023 vested in 2026 at 112% and 111% of target, respectively (see page 86) 1 Corporate Operating Revenue and Corporate Adjusted EPS, as used for corporate-level financial goals under the AIP, are non-GAAP measures.

2026 proxy, filed 2026-03-27: EBITDA threshold and actual 2026 performance-share vesting · Filed 27/03/2026

In order to avoid penalizing our leaders for negative impacts on operating revenue growth, the Committee determined that, under the 2026 AIP, corporate operating revenue will be increased by an amount calculated based on the total number of VantageScore mortgage credit scores sold in 2026 multiplied by the difference between the average price charged by Equifax for a FICO mortgage credit score and a VantageScore mortgage credit score.

2026 proxy, filed 2026-03-27: incentive revenue adjustment for score-price differences · Filed 27/03/2026

All of our standing Committees are comprised solely of independent directors.

2026 proxy, filed 2026-03-27: standing committee independence · Filed 27/03/2026

In addition, the Audit and Technology Committees of the Board coordinate on risk management oversight with respect to cybersecurity, including through quarterly joint meetings that cover the following topics: •Regular reports from the internal audit department regarding the security and technology portions of the internal audit plan •Regular reports from our CISO and CTO regarding the cybersecurity control environment, including remediation updates, control posture analyses and other recurring items The Technology Committee of the Board oversees our information security program, including: •Reviewing with management our technology investments and infrastructure associated with risk management, including policies relating to information security, disaster recovery and business continuity •Receiving quarterly reports directly from our CISO, including updates on our enterprise cybersecurity threat level •Overseeing the engagement of outside advisors to review our cybersecurity program •Reviewing the results of our annual information security program maturity assessment performed by a third party •Reviewing the results of our annual security program risk assessment prepared by management The Audit Committee of the Board discusses with management our risk management policies and procedures, including: •Receiving regular quarterly reports from our Chief Risk, Privacy and Compliance Officer regarding our global privacy, risk management and compliance programs, which includes the results of second line testing of our security controls Management Oversight of Cybersecurity Risk Our information security program is managed through implementation, monitoring and continuous improvement of the security program with active participation of management as described below.

2025 Form 10-K, filed 2026-02-19: recurring cybersecurity and privacy oversight · Filed 19/02/2026

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework), and our report dated February 19, 2026 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

2025 Form 10-K, filed 2026-02-19: auditor opinion on internal control over financial reporting · Filed 19/02/2026

(the “Company”) approved amendments to the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”), effective immediately.

Form 8-K, filed 2026-06-16: bylaw amendments effective immediately · Filed 16/06/2026

The amendments to the Bylaws revise the requirements for shareholders to request a special meeting by providing that a special meeting of the shareholders may be called by the Secretary of the Company upon the proper request of one or more shareholders owning at least 25% of the voting power of all shares of stock of the Company issued and outstanding for at least one year as of the date of the request, subject to compliance with the procedural requirements set forth in the amendments.

Form 8-K, filed 2026-06-16: adopted special-meeting threshold and holding-period requirements · Filed 16/06/2026

AI Governance Program Since 2018, we have invested approximately $3 billion in building the Equifax Cloud, our cloud-native security and technology infrastructure.

2026 proxy, filed 2026-03-27: cumulative Equifax Cloud investment · Filed 27/03/2026

•Signed a definitive agreement to acquire Círculo de Crédito, the fastest growing credit bureau in Mexico, for an enterprise value of $750 million.

Second-quarter earnings release, filed 2026-07-21: signed acquisition agreement and enterprise value · Filed 21/07/2026

Expect Círculo de Crédito acquisition to close in the fourth quarter.

Third-quarter earnings release, filed 2026-10-20: acquisition closing remains expected · Filed 20/10/2026

InMarch 2026, we made VantageScore® 4.0 mortgagecredit scores available for $1 – reducing loan acquisitioncosts for consumers to make the path to homeownershipmore affordable.

2026 proxy, filed 2026-03-27: announced mortgage credit-score price · Filed 27/03/2026

Publication history

Publication history
VersionUpdatedCompetitive advantage
828/10/2026narrow
728/10/2026narrow
624/10/2026narrow
523/10/2026narrow
422/10/2026narrow
318/10/2026narrow
218/10/2026narrow
118/10/2026Unavailable

Sources

Research methodology and limitations · What is an economic moat?