Skip to content

Roper Technologies

NASDAQ: ROP · USD

Roper Technologies (ROP) Economic Moat Analysis—

Competitive advantages, dated evidence and erosion risks.

Analysis needs refresh

Narrow economic moat

Roper’s current moat is narrow, led by switching costs from deeply embedded, vertical workflow software used by regulated and operationally complex customers. Multi‑period growth in remaining performance obligations and backlog, plus sizable conversion of deferred revenue tied to SaaS and PCS renewals, corroborate customer stickiness across the portfolio. Additional protection comes from intangible assets (domain expertise and proprietary data), but these are largely issuer-described; pricing discretion is constrained by competitive and government-contract dynamics, and disclosures flag AI disruption as a potential erosion vector.

Switching costs

Mission‑critical, vertical workflow software (e.g., compliance, campus, legal, K‑12, P&C insurance) embedded in customer operations creates high switching frictions, evidenced by large and growing RPO/backlog and recurring SaaS/PCS renewals converting deferred revenue.

Durability
Supported by multi‑year RPO and backlog growth and recurring renewals across segments; durability is portfolio‑wide but not uniform across every business.
Competitors
Lucasys Inc.
Erosion risks
AI-enabled alternatives, competitive pricing pressure, and the ability of government customers to unilaterally modify/terminate contracts could weaken stickiness in affected subsegments.
What would invalidate the thesis
Sustained declines in backlog/RPO or revenue conversion from deferred revenue; visible customer migrations off core platforms; broad margin compression tied to price concessions; material government-customer cancellations.
Evidence (8) · Counterevidence (4)

Intangible assets

Vertical domain expertise and proprietary/unique data sets confer product differentiation and embed solutions in customers’ workflows; sizable recognized intangible assets reflect the portfolio’s software IP base.

Durability
Niche positioning and data advantages can persist, but require continuous product refresh; durability depends on ongoing innovation to defend differentiation.
Competitors
Comparison not established
Erosion risks
Issuer discloses risk that failure to develop/enhance products (including with AI) or more effective AI adoption by competitors could erode advantages.
What would invalidate the thesis
Loss of data uniqueness or regulatory/process relevance; adverse legal/regulatory changes reducing compliance value; customer churn indicating diminished differentiation.
Evidence (4) · Counterevidence (2)

Changes since the previous analysis

  • No change in verdict versus prior coverage: still narrow. This update adds explicit 2026 evidence of rising backlog and large deferred revenue conversion tied to SaaS/PCS renewals, while highlighting margin variability and issuer‑disclosed AI/pricing risks that cap moat breadth.

Evidence limitations

  • Competitor landscape is described generically in filings; few named competitors are disclosed (Lucasys Inc. appears only in a single legal matter), limiting direct peer benchmarking.
  • Retention is inferred from RPO/backlog growth and deferred revenue conversion; no churn, renewal-rate, or cohort data are provided.
  • Pricing power is not isolated in disclosures; risk factors indicate potential for pricing pressure, but there is no quantified price-realization evidence.
  • Intangible-asset advantages (proprietary data, workflow density) are primarily management statements; durability through AI cycles is not yet demonstrated by third-party outcomes.

Financial indicators to test against the thesis

Calculated from annual filings. Missing data remains unavailable. Detailed financial charts remain in the other topics.

Financial indicators to test against the thesis
PeriodGross marginOperating marginROICFCF margin
202167.8%25.6%5.9%34.3%
202269.9%28.4%5.7%12.9%
202369.7%28.2%6.0%31.8%
202469.3%28.4%6.3%33.1%
202569.2%28.3%6.4%31.5%

Pricing power—

Insufficient verified evidence to assign a score.

Management—

Insufficient verified evidence to assign a score.

Sources and methodology

Analysis needs refresh · Updated 25/10/2026 · Version 12

AI interpretation based on checked source excerpts. Issuer assertions and evidence limitations remain explicit.

Policy quality-scores-3: six equally weighted categories. The overall score requires full coverage. Missing inputs are not zero. Qualitative grades are sourced interpretations, not probabilities. 3/6 · 03/11/2026

Moat—

Awaiting a sourced assessment under the current scoring policy and financial basis.

Pricing power—

Awaiting a sourced assessment under the current scoring policy and financial basis.

Predictability84

5 consecutive published annual periods. Equal weights: nondeclining revenue frequency; revenue-growth volatility (5–40pp); positive FCF frequency; FCF-margin volatility (3–20pp). Stability indicator, not a growth forecast.

Nondeclining revenue years (%)
75.00
Revenue growth volatility (pp)
9.04
Positive FCF years (%)
100.00
FCF margin volatility (pp)
7.97
observedAnnualPeriods
5.00

Financial strength33

Equal-weight grades: debt/FCF (1–8x), net debt/earnings before interest and tax (0–5x), interest service (1–12x), current ratio (0.75–2x). Earnings use reported operating income, an original issuer-reported unadjusted EBIT reconciled to net income, income tax and signed net interest, or reported pretax profit plus reported gross interest expense. Reported EBIT is distinct from GAAP operating income and gross interest. Interest service uses earnings/interest expense; if unavailable, it uses reported operating cash flow/cash interest paid, without relabeling cash paid as accrued expense. Nonpositive cash flow/earnings score 0 for their service component; reported zero interest with a positive numerator scores 100. Net cash scores 100 for net leverage. Missing disclosures remain unavailable. General nonfinancial-company rubric, not a credit rating; exceptional and nonoperating gains are not normalized out. IFRS finance-cost and cash-flow classifications retain their reported scope.

debtFcfGrade
60.99
netDebtEbitGrade
19.45
interestCoverageGrade
53.44
currentRatioGrade
0.00
Debt / FCF (x)
3.73
Net debt / operating income (x)
4.03
Interest coverage (x)
6.88
Current ratio (x)
0.52

Capital allocation80

Three-year equal-weight indicators: pretax return on average invested capital (0–25%; equity + debt − cash, each year and its prior year), share-count growth (0–5%, lower better), share-based cost/revenue (2–20%, lower better), consolidated FCF/net income (0–1x). Return uses reported operating income, an original issuer-reported unadjusted EBIT reconciled to net income, income tax and signed net interest, or EBIT calculated from reported pretax profit plus reported gross interest expense; the issuer-reported EBIT is distinct from GAAP operating income and gross interest; exceptional/nonoperating gains are not normalized out. Share-based cost uses the reported cash-flow add-back or, if absent, separately reported recognized compensation expense; the latter never becomes an FCF adjustment. Nonpositive net income scores 0 for cash conversion; absent income/FCF stays unavailable. ROIC remains undefined for nonpositive invested capital; the explicit asset-return alternative does not change the ROIC chart. Missing financial inputs alone never trigger an alternative. Does not establish acquisition quality or buyback timing.

3-year pre-tax operating return (%)
7.93
3-year average dilution (%)
0.47
3-year average SBC / revenue (%)
2.06
cashConversionGrade
100.00

Management—

Awaiting a sourced assessment under the current scoring policy and financial basis.

Evidence

Increasingly, this includes AI-enabled products and functionality embedded within customers’ mission-critical workflows.

Part I, Item 1. Business – Market Share, Market Expansion, and Product Development · Filed 24/02/2026

We believe our market positions are attributable to the applications expertise used to create high value products and solutions for our customers, the underlying critical nature of our offerings, and the inherent customer intimacy of our chosen niche markets.

Part I, Item 1. Business – Market Share, Market Expansion, and Product Development · Filed 24/02/2026

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, total remaining performance obligations were $5,204.2 and $4,754.9, respectively.

Part I, Item 1. Business – Remaining Performance Obligations · Filed 24/02/2026

Backlog was $3,424.6 at December 31, 2025 and $3,105.4 at December 31, 2024.

Part I, Item 1. Business – Backlog · Filed 24/02/2026

Revenue recognized that was included in the deferred revenue balance on December 31, 2025 and 2024 was $573.5 and $531.6 for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and $1,422.8 and $1,306.0 for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements – Contract balances · Filed 31/07/2026

Revenue recognized that was included in the deferred revenue balance on December 31, 2025 and 2024 was $849.3 and $774.4 for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements – Contract balances · Filed 01/05/2026

The change in our net contract assets/(liabilities) from December 31, 2025 to June 30, 2026 was primarily due to the timing of payments and invoicing related to SaaS and PCS renewals, driven predominantly by the SaaS renewal cycle of our Frontline business which primarily occurs in the third quarter.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements – Contract balances · Filed 31/07/2026

Backlog increased 11.0% to $3,286.0 at June 30, 2026 as compared to $2,961.3 at June 30, 2025 due primarily to acquisitions and organic growth in our software segments.

MD&A – Backlog discussion · Filed 31/07/2026

Backlog was $3,105.4 at December 31, 2024 and $3,156.6 at December 31, 2023.

Part I, Item 1. Business – Backlog · Filed 24/02/2025

We face intense competition. If we do not compete effectively, our business may suffer.

Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors – Competition · Filed 24/02/2026

Moreover, competition may require us to adjust prices to stay competitive.

Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors – Competition/Pricing · Filed 24/02/2025

In many situations, government entities can unilaterally terminate or modify existing contracts without cause and without penalty to the government agency, and government contracts may be subject to specialized compliance obligations, audits, investigations, and bid processes that can delay awards and increase costs.

Part I, Item 1. Business – Governmental Regulations/Contracts · Filed 24/02/2026

Selling, general and administrative expenses: Application Software (42.3) % (41.9) % (42.3) % (41.7) % Network Software (43.4) % (39.3) % (43.5) % (39.5) % Technology Enabled Products (23.6) % (23.1) % (24.0) % (23.4) % Total (38.1) % (36.9) % (38.3) % (37.0) % Segment operating margin: Application Software 27.4 % 26.9 % 27.1 % 26.4 % Network Software 41.0 % 43.9 % 40.8 % 44.1 % Technology Enabled Products 33.3 % 35.4 % 32.9 % 35.2 % Total 31.6 % 32.3 % 31.2 % 32.0 % Corporate administrative expenses * (3.9) % (4.1) % (3.8) % (3.9) % Income from operations 27.7 % 28.2 % 27.5 % 28.1 % Interest expense, net (5.3) % (4.1) % (5.0) % (3.7) % Equity investment gain (loss), net 39.6 % 0.9 % 23.8 % (0.7) % Other expense, net — % — % (0.1) % — % Earnings before income taxes 62.0 % 25.0 % 46.2 % 23.6 % Income taxes (6.6) % (5.5) % (6.3) % (5.1) % Net earnings 55.4 % 19.5 % 39.9 % 18.5 % * Includes unallocated corporate general and administrative expenses and enterprise-wide stock-based compensation.

MD&A – Segment operating margin · Filed 31/07/2026

The resulting operating margin was 32.4% in the first quarter of 2026 as compared to 35.0% in the first quarter of 2025.

MD&A – Segment operating margin · Filed 01/05/2026

New AI offerings may disrupt our offerings or transform workforce needs and may negatively impact demand for our offerings, or our competitors may be able to incorporate AI into their offerings more efficiently or successfully than we are able to.

Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors – AI risk · Filed 31/07/2026

(“PowerPlan”), is a defendant in an action pending in the U.S.

Part I, Item 3. Legal Proceedings – Lucasys Inc. v. PowerPlan · Filed 22/02/2024

By leveraging our deep domain expertise, proprietary data, and long-standing customer relationships, we believe these AI capabilities enhance product differentiation, and drive incremental automation and improved customer outcomes which support expanded monetization opportunities.

Part I, Item 1. Business – Market Share, Market Expansion, and Product Development · Filed 24/02/2026

Given the depth of our customer relationships, our proprietary and unique data sets, and our embedded position inside mission-critical workflows, we are well positioned to create value for customers with AI.

Q3 2026 Earnings Release – Management commentary · Filed 22/10/2026

Other intangible assets, net 9,347.3 9,764.2 Deferred taxes 67.8 73.3 Equity investment 1,792.2 796.3 Other assets 554.3 517.0 Total assets $ 35,169.5 $ 34,577.0 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY: Accounts payable $ 174.1 $ 150.3 Accrued compensation 232.0 293.0 Deferred revenue 1,707.8 1,906.8 Other accrued liabilities 588.9 642.3 Income taxes payable 49.4 28.0 Current portion of long-term debt, net 718.3 705.2 Total current liabilities 3,470.5 3,725.6 Long-term debt, net of current portion 10,601.1 8,595.8 Deferred taxes 1,897.4 1,883.1 Other liabilities 500.2 491.0 Total liabilities 16,469.2 14,695.5 Common stock, 350.0 shares authorized; 109.4 shares issued and 98.9 outstanding at June 30, 2026 and 109.3 shares issued and 106.6 outstanding at December 31, 2025 1.1 1.1 Additional paid-in capital 3,391.9 3,292.2 Retained earnings 18,697.6 17,205.7 Accumulated other comprehensive loss (135.5) (101.4) Treasury stock, 10.5 shares at June 30, 2026 and 2.7 shares at December 31, 2025 (3,254.8) (516.1) Total stockholders’ equity 18,700.3 19,881.5 Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 35,169.5 $ 34,577.0 7 Roper Technologies, Inc.

Q2 2026 Earnings Release (financial schedules) – Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets · Filed 23/07/2026

PowerPlan – financial and compliance management software and solutions to large complex companies in asset-intensive industries.

Part I, Item 1. Business – Application Software segment descriptions · Filed 24/02/2026

The growth of 4.8% in organic revenues was broad-based across the segment, led by our application software businesses serving the legal, project-based private sector, higher education, and property and casualty insurance markets.

MD&A – Application Software growth detail · Filed 31/07/2026

The resulting operating margin was 32.9% in the six months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to 35.2% in the six months ended June 30, 2025.

MD&A – Technology Enabled Products margin discussion · Filed 31/07/2026

Third quarter 2026 highlights •Revenue increased 8% to $2.17 billion; organic revenue was +7% and acquisition contribution was +1%

Q3 2026 Earnings Release – Highlights · Filed 22/10/2026

Net revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2026 were $2,095.3 as compared to $1,882.8 for the three months ended March 31, 2025, an increase of 11.3%.

MD&A – Q1 2026 revenue growth · Filed 01/05/2026

• Pay for Performance. Similar to prior years, in 2025, total direct compensation at target that was at risk and tied to stock price and performance objectives was 96% for the CEO, and 91% on average for our other named executive officers.

2026 Proxy – Pay for Performance · Filed 07/04/2026

Independent Chair of the Board: Our Chair of the Board is independent.

2026 Proxy – Independent Chair of the Board · Filed 07/04/2026

The Clawback Policy provides for the prompt recovery (or clawback) of certain excess incentive-based compensation received during an applicable three-year recovery period by current or former executive officers in the event we are required to prepare an accounting restatement due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws.

2026 Proxy – Compensation Clawback Policy · Filed 07/04/2026

In the last three years, we have deployed approximately $8,960 of capital toward acquisitions.

Part I, Item 1. Business – Acquisition deployment · Filed 24/02/2026

10 During the six months ended June 30, 2026, the Company repurchased 7.865 shares of its common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $2,724.1 and an average price paid per share of $346.34.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements – Share repurchases · Filed 31/07/2026

Borrowings under revolving credit facility, net 2,000.0 1,275.0 Debt issuance costs (3.9) — Cash dividends to stockholders (191.4) (177.2) Repurchases of common stock (2,726.7) — Proceeds from (tax withholding payments for) stock-based compensation, net (8.6) 73.8 Treasury stock sales under employee stock purchase plan 12.7 12.5 Other, net 12.8 (43.9) Cash provided by (used in) financing activities (905.1) 1,140.2 Effect of exchange rate changes on cash (16.7) 32.5 Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 67.5 54.2 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 297.4 188.2 Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 364.9 $ 242.4 10

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Financing activities (Q2 2026) · Filed 23/07/2026

The future success of our business will depend, in part, on our ability to design and manufacture new competitive products, including the development of software, and to enhance existing product and software offerings, including through the development and deployment of AI.

Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors – Product development risk (including AI) · Filed 24/02/2026

Publication history

Publication history
VersionUpdatedCompetitive advantage
1203/11/2026narrow
1128/10/2026narrow
1028/10/2026narrow
925/10/2026narrow
824/10/2026narrow
723/10/2026narrow
622/10/2026narrow
519/10/2026narrow
419/10/2026uncertain
318/10/2026uncertain

Sources

Research methodology and limitations · What is an economic moat?