AI interpretation based on checked source excerpts. Issuer assertions and evidence limitations remain explicit.
Policy quality-scores-2: six equally weighted categories. The overall score requires full coverage. Missing inputs are not zero. Qualitative grades are sourced interpretations, not probabilities. 3/6 · 18/10/2026
Moat50
Equal-weight average of four evidence-backed rubric grades (0–4), scaled to 100.
structural advantage · 2/4 · Multi-quarter qualification and upfront expense support a narrow entry and displacement barrier, complemented by monetized IP. Competitive superiority and replacement difficulty remain incompletely demonstrated.
durability · 2/4 · Qualification can protect an incumbent application, but subsequent nodes require new validation. Dependence on DuPont for some IP enforcement limits control over protection.
customer dependency · 2/4 · Process-specific selection and qualification indicate technical dependency, while recurring consumable demand supports repeat purchasing. Cancellable orders and non-binding forecasts limit commercial commitment.
erosion resilience · 2/4 · Trade secrets and a broad patent estate provide protection, but licensed-IP enforcement dependence and actual IP settlement costs make resilience mixed. The disclosures do not establish realized competitive erosion.
Pricing power—
Insufficient evidence for every rubric criterion; no category score is inferred.
realized pricing · — · Management describes a measured-pricing approach, but the passages supply no observed selling-price changes or price realization.
retention · 2/4 · Assessed indirectly from application qualification and recurring consumable demand, with an unquantified issuer assertion of strong renewals. Cancellation rights constrain confidence; no retention rate is inferred.
margin resilience · — · The supplied passages do not establish comparable operating-margin performance or realized recovery of input costs through pricing. Cash generation alone cannot establish margin resilience.
contractual freedom · — · Non-binding forecasts and cancellation rights describe customer flexibility, but do not establish Qnity's ability to reset prices, impose surcharges or change commercial terms.
Predictability—
Five consecutive annual periods are required for predictability; the accepted history is incomplete.
Financial strength72
Equal-weight grades: debt/FCF (1–8x), net debt/earnings before interest and tax (0–5x), interest service (1–12x), current ratio (0.75–2x). Earnings use reported operating income, or reported pretax profit plus reported interest expense when operating income is unavailable. Interest service uses earnings/interest expense; if unavailable, it uses reported operating cash flow/cash interest paid, without relabeling cash paid as accrued expense. Nonpositive cash flow/earnings score 0 for their service component; reported zero interest with a positive numerator scores 100. Net cash scores 100 for net leverage. Missing disclosures remain unavailable. General nonfinancial-company rubric, not a credit rating; exceptional and nonoperating gains are not normalized out. IFRS finance-cost and cash-flow classifications retain their reported scope.
- debtFcfGrade
- 56.06
- netDebtEbitGrade
- 34.55
- interestCoverageGrade
- 100.00
- currentRatioGrade
- 95.63
- Debt / FCF (x)
- 4.08
- Net debt / operating income (x)
- 3.27
- Interest coverage (x)
- 14.63
- Current ratio (x)
- 1.95
Capital allocation—
Missing annual observations required by this category.
Management63
Equal-weight average of four evidence-backed rubric grades (0–4), scaled to 100.
capital discipline · 2/4 · Historical operating cash generation, actual investment, measured repurchases and reduced borrowing spreads provide concrete evidence. Higher capital spending, declining interim operating cash flow and rising transformation costs offset it; investment returns and repurchase value creation are not established.
incentive alignment · 3/4 · Actual equity grants, three-year PSU metrics tied to relative TSR and adjusted operating EBITDA, adopted ownership requirements, clawbacks and hedging restrictions demonstrate meaningful alignment mechanisms. Ownership compliance and long-term payout outcomes remain unverified.
execution · 2/4 · Assessed partly from indirect operating evidence: historical cash growth included higher earnings, while 2026 disclosures identify increased sales and production. Debt repricing is a completed achievement. Rising transformation costs and the absence of demonstrated transformation benefits limit the assessment.
governance · 3/4 · An independent chair, nine independent directors out of ten, fully independent committees and adopted accountability policies demonstrate strong current structures. The board remains classified until the disclosed phase-out, and separation agreements were negotiated without independent Qnity representation; effectiveness has a short track record.
Evidence
Fabricators choose specific materials for each CMP process based on performance needs of each CMP application and node.
Business: application-specific CMP material selection · Filed 26/02/2026
Our growth depends on our ability to secure design “wins”, which are instances when a customer validates one of our materials for use in a new node, package architecture, or end-product.
MD&A: customer validation and design wins · Filed 26/02/2026
Because the qualification cycle in semiconductors and advanced electronics can extend multiple quarters and often requires upfront expense, the timing, size, and scope are often difficult to predict.
MD&A: qualification duration and upfront expense · Filed 26/02/2026
Our products are consumable or unit-driven, with over 90% of Qnity’s revenue in 2025 generated from products that are either utilized in the manufacturing process or incorporated into final electronic devices.
Business: consumable and unit-driven revenue · Filed 26/02/2026
In a fast-paced electronics industry, our customers’ needs are highly performance-driven and our long-standing relationships and strong renewal rates demonstrate our commitment to delivering excellence in a demanding market.
MD&A: issuer assertion of relationships and renewal rates · Filed 04/08/2026
Instead, we work closely with our customers to develop non-binding forecasts for the purchase and sale of our products over the short-term and pursuant to certain payment terms and conditions based on the type and location of the customer and the products or services purchased.
Business: non-binding purchase forecasts and payment terms · Filed 26/02/2026
Our customers may cancel their orders, change production quantities from forecasted volumes or delay production for reasons beyond our control.
Business: customer cancellation and production-volume flexibility · Filed 26/02/2026
Many of the processes we use to make products are kept as trade secrets which, from time to time, may be licensed to third parties.
Business: manufacturing trade secrets · Filed 26/02/2026
Based on our patent estate at December 31, 2025, we hold about 7,000 patents and patent applications globally.
Business: patent estate at December 31, 2025 · Filed 26/02/2026
Significant Items for the Year Ended December 31, 2024 Semiconductor Technologies Interconnect Solutions Corporate Total In millions Restructuring and asset related charges - net 1 $ (1) $ (11) $ 4 $ (8) Legal costs 2 (23) — — (23) Gain on licensing agreement 3 13 — — 13 Total $ (11) $ (11) $ 4 $ (18) 1.
Segment significant items: 2024 licensing gain and legal costs · Filed 26/02/2026
3. Reflects the license fee income received under an intellectual property license agreement.
Segment significant items: intellectual-property license fee income · Filed 26/02/2026
While we believe that our intellectual property estate, taken as a whole, provides a competitive advantage in many of our businesses, no single patent, trademark, license or group of related patents, trademarks or licenses is in itself essential to us as a whole or to any of our businesses.
Business: issuer assessment of portfolio advantage and absence of essential individual IP · Filed 26/02/2026
We are dependent to a certain extent on DuPont to prosecute, maintain, defend and enforce certain of the intellectual property licensed under our Intellectual Property Cross-License Agreement with DuPont.
Spin-off risks: dependence on DuPont for licensed intellectual property · Filed 26/02/2026
If DuPont chooses to not enforce the intellectual property licensed to us under the Intellectual Property Cross-License Agreement, we may not be able to prevent competitors from making, using and selling competitive products and services.
Spin-off risks: consequences of non-enforcement of licensed intellectual property · Filed 26/02/2026
2. Reflects legal settlement charges relating to an intellectual property matter.
Segment significant items: intellectual-property legal settlement charges · Filed 26/02/2026
We manage these dynamics through customer-based forecasting, disciplined allocation processes, and a measured pricing approach.
MD&A: management's measured-pricing approach · Filed 26/02/2026
Cash generated from operating activities was $1,273 million, $1,061 million and $882 million in 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
Liquidity: operating cash generation for 2023–2025 · Filed 26/02/2026
2. Reflects the accrued interest earned on employee retention credits and is recorded in “Interest income” within the “Other income (expense) - net” line item in the Company’s unaudited interim Consolidated Statements of Operations 29 Table of Contents Segment and Corporate Information Semiconductor Technologies Interconnect Solutions Corporate Total In millions As of June 30, 2026 Total Assets $ 7,194 $ 5,689 $ 1,448 $ 14,331 Investment in nonconsolidated affiliates $ 400 $ 10 $ — $ 410 As of December 31, 2025 Total Assets $ 7,022 $ 5,594 $ 1,454 $ 14,070 Investment in nonconsolidated affiliates $ 375 $ 11 $ — $ 386 Capital Expenditure Reconciliation to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, In millions 2026 2025 2026 2025 Semiconductor Technologies $ 76 $ 33 $ 125 $ 57 Interconnect Solutions 27 24 41 44 Corporate 14 5 25 8 Segment and Corporate Totals $ 117 $ 62 $ 191 $ 109 Accrual to cash adjustment 1 (27) (13) 21 44 Total $ 90 $ 49 $ 212 $ 153 1.Reflects the incremental cash spent or unpaid on capital expenditures; total capital expenditures are presented on a cash basis.
Segment information: capital expenditure reconciliation · Filed 04/08/2026
During the six months ended June 30, 2026, we repurchased 402,688 shares under the $500M Authorization for $50 million at an average share price of $124.12 per share.
MD&A: completed first-half 2026 share repurchases · Filed 04/08/2026
The decrease in cash provided by operating activities is primarily related to payments of interest on our long-term debt, which was not outstanding as of June 30, 2025, and an increase in net cash used for working capital.
Liquidity: operating cash-flow decline from interest and working capital · Filed 04/08/2026
The First Amendment reduced the applicable margin on term SOFR borrowings under the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility from 2.00% to 1.75%, with no material changes to principal, maturity, amortization, or covenant structure.
Recent developments: July 1, 2026 debt repricing terms · Filed 04/08/2026
For the first six months of 2026, transformation, integration and other charges were $70 million, up from $19 million for the same period in the prior year.
MD&A: first-half 2026 transformation and integration charges · Filed 04/08/2026
In the first quarter of 2026, the Company granted 0.3 million RSUs and 0.1 million performance based stock units ("PSUs").
Stock-based compensation: actual first-quarter 2026 grants · Filed 04/08/2026
60% PSUs Payouts to be based on achievement of Relative TSR and Adjusted Operating EBITDA goals over three years.
Compensation discussion: three-year PSU performance metrics · Filed 08/04/2026
36 Compensation Discussion & Analysis Pay Mix for 2026 Compensation CEO Other NEOs Executive Compensation Governance Best Practices After the Spin-Off, the Qnity Committee adopted Qnity’s executive compensation programs which include the following best practices consistent with those embedded in DuPont’s programs in effect prior to the Spin-Off: What We Do Maintain a pay mix that is heavily performance-based Actively engage with stockholders Align executive compensation outcomes with company and individual performance Annually assess peer group composition and competitive compensation practices Seek annual stockholder advisory approval of executive compensation Maintain strong stock ownership requirements of six times base salary for the CEO and two times base salary for the other executive officers Conduct an annual executive talent review and discussion on succession planning Maintain a robust compensation clawback policy covering both cash and equity Review executive compensation statements (tally sheets) Conduct annual compensation risk assessments What We Don’t Do Provide single-trigger change in control agreements or excise tax gross ups Grant options below market value, extend original option terms, reprice, reload or exchange underwater options without stockholder approval Permit hedging or pledging of the Company’s securities Include a liberal share counting provision in our equity plan Guaranteed annual salary increases or bonuses Provide minimum payouts under the Long-Term Incentive Plan Provide uncapped short and long-term incentive payouts Provide excessive perks 2026 Proxy Statement 37 Compensation Discussion & Analysis Overview of 2025 Program Elements This section describes the elements of DuPont’s executive compensations programs in effect prior to the Spin-Off, how DuPont determined the size of each element and the rationale for providing each element.
Compensation governance: adopted ownership, clawback and trading policies · Filed 08/04/2026
Board Composition & Independence •Independent Board Chair with significant responsibilities •Majority independent Board with 9 of 10 directors being independent •Balanced Board with a large breadth of varied skills, experiences, and areas of expertise •Fully independent Audit, People and Compensation, and Nomination and Governance Committees •Independent Executive Sessions with only independent directors at every regularly scheduled Board and Committee meeting •Diverse Board with directors identifying as women, ethnically and racially diverse and international backgrounds Strong Governance Practices •Annual Board & Committee evaluations •Robust director Code of Conduct •Restrictions on overboarding •Mandatory retirement for directors after reaching age 75 •Significant stock ownership guidelines for directors (5x annual cash retainer) •Majority vote standard in uncontested elections with plurality carve-out for contested elections and mandatory resignation policy •Phase-out of classified board, with all directors standing for election annually beginning in 2028 8 Voting Roadmap Key Executive Compensation Highlights Before our Spin-off from DuPont on November 1, 2025 (Spin-off), our NEOs’ 2025 compensation was determined in accordance with DuPont’s compensation philosophy and program design.
Governance: board independence, committees and classified-board phase-out · Filed 08/04/2026
Such agreements were intended to be entered into on arm’s-length terms similar to those that would be agreed with an unaffiliated third party such as a buyer in a sale transaction, but we did not have an independent board of directors or a management team independent of DuPont representing our interests while such agreements were being negotiated.
Spin-off risks: absence of independent representation during agreement negotiations · Filed 26/02/2026
Changes in working capital were primarily driven by higher trade receivables due to increased sales and higher inventory based on business activity, net of increased accounts payable due to increased production and inventory builds to support sales growth.
Liquidity: increased sales, production and inventory supporting growth · Filed 04/08/2026
In 2025, cash flows provided by operating activities increased compared to 2024, primarily due to higher earnings and an increase in accounts payable and employee related liabilities.
Liquidity: earnings and liability timing contributions to 2025 operating cash growth · Filed 26/02/2026
