Skip to content

Equinix

NASDAQ: EQIX · USD

Equinix (EQIX) Economic Moat Analysis56

Competitive advantages, dated evidence and erosion risks.

Narrow economic moat

Equinix has an evidenced but geographically uneven network advantage from carrier neutrality, network variety and customer adjacency, supported by an established global footprint. Contract renewals and recurring demand support customer dependency, but do not establish strong contractual lock-in. Realized pricing power remains unproven: scheduled price increases are disclosed, without measured pricing outcomes. Limited carrier diversity, alternative interconnection models and power constraints prevent a wide-moat conclusion.

Network effects

Customers benefit from colocating with networks, suppliers and business partners, making the existing ecosystem more useful as participation grows. Equinix reports that network neutrality and network variety have historically provided a competitive advantage; its global footprint supports this ecosystem.

Durability
The established footprint and repeated historical disclosures support a current advantage rather than merely an expansion opportunity. Durability depends on preserving carrier diversity, customer adjacency and reliable connectivity within individual markets; exceptional long-term protection is not demonstrated.
Competitors
Comparison not established
Erosion risks
Carrier diversity already limits the advantage in some markets. Alternative connectivity models could bypass colocation, cloud migration could reduce demand, and redirected hyperscale capacity could intensify competition. Power limitations in older facilities could weaken the usefulness of established locations. Aggressive competitor pricing is a disclosed possibility, not evidence of realized company-wide pricing deterioration.
What would invalidate the thesis
The thesis would be invalidated by sustained customer or carrier departures from established ecosystems, adoption of bypass models accompanied by declining interconnection demand, or persistent price concessions and weaker renewals in previously well-connected markets. Sustained power-related inability to serve existing ecosystem demand would also undermine it.
Evidence (5) · Counterevidence (7)

Changes since the previous analysis

  • Retain the previous narrow verdict; the supplied evidence continues to support a geographically uneven network advantage.
  • Add explicit assessment of renewal contracts, scheduled price increases and interconnection termination rights without treating them as demonstrated realized pricing power.
  • Add management assessments using actual compensation grants, operating achievements, spending, dilution, commitments and the realized Equinix Metal impairment.

Evidence limitations

  • All evidence comes from issuer filings. Network-effect explanations and historical competitive-advantage statements are issuer assertions; footprint, contractual terms and reported outcomes provide firmer corroboration but do not measure the network advantage directly.
  • No supplied passage identifies a named company as a competitor. Competitor arrays remain empty; named acquisition counterparties and compensation advisers are not established competitors.
  • The passages do not provide realized price changes, comparable margin trends, customer retention rates or customer-cohort results. Scheduled increases are not proof of achieved increases, and revenue growth does not isolate pricing.
  • Renewal contracts and recurring-revenue disclosures support an indirect retention assessment, without establishing renewal success rates or substantial switching costs.
  • The proxy supplies compensation and governance evidence, but the passages omit actual executive ownership balances and complete pay-performance outcomes. Granted awards are not assumed vested, and stockholder proposals are not treated as adopted.
  • Sources retain their supplied filed dateKind. Historical achievements are assessed for their stated periods; forward-looking AI and hyperscale opportunities are not treated as established moat advantages.
  • No separate cost advantage, intangible-asset moat or efficient-scale advantage is established. Improved power efficiency alone does not demonstrate a cost lead over competitors.

Financial indicators to test against the thesis

Calculated from annual filings. Missing data remains unavailable. Detailed financial charts remain in the other topics.

Financial indicators to test against the thesis
PeriodGross marginOperating marginROICFCF margin
202147.7%16.7%4.5%-3.1%
202248.3%16.5%4.7%9.4%
202348.4%17.6%5.3%5.3%
202448.9%15.2%4.4%2.1%
202551.1%20.0%—-4.3%

Pricing power—

  • Pricing outcomes

    Scheduled price increases are disclosed, but no supplied outcome separates achieved pricing from volume, mix or currency. Possible competitive price adjustments do not establish realized cuts.

  • Customer demand

    Contracts already in renewal periods, recurring-revenue disclosures and customer adjacency support repeat demand indirectly. No retention rate is supplied, and significant interconnection termination flexibility limits the inference.

  • Margin resilience

    Comparable consolidated results demonstrate margin resilience. Q1 2026 GAAP operating margin increased to 23.6% from 20.6% a year earlier, while gross margin held near 51.5% versus 51.3%. Q2 gross margin increased to 53.1% from 52.0%; first-half gross margin rose to 52.3% from 51.6%. Reported adjusted EBITDA margins reached 51% in Q1 and 53% in Q2. These realized results support strong resilience, although Q2 benefited from one-time xScale fees and the passages do not isolate cost pass-through or establish exceptional durability.

  • Pricing freedom

    Scheduled price increases demonstrate some contractual pricing provision, while renewal periods permit periodic renegotiation. Customer termination rights constrain enforceability of future revenue; unilateral repricing authority and power-cost pass-through terms are not supplied.

Management56

  • Capital discipline

    Reported AFFO per-share growth and higher first-half diluted EPS provide positive outcome evidence despite dilution. Capital expenditure rose to $4.311 billion in 2025, financing includes actual share issuance, and substantial commitments remain. The $160 million Equinix Metal impairment is a realized allocation failure. Missing project returns and cash-flow totals limit the assessment.

  • Incentive alignment

    Actual 2026 grants include revenue, AFFO per-share and TSR conditions with multiyear service requirements, demonstrating meaningful equity and performance alignment. The financial performance period is only one year, actual ownership balances are absent, and grants are not assumed earned or vested.

  • Execution

    Reported revenue and AFFO growth, improved power efficiency, completed restructuring and higher first-half diluted EPS demonstrate execution through operating outcomes. The Metal impairment and actual permitting delays make the record mixed; these results do not establish exceptional management causality.

  • Governance

    Independent committees and high actual director attendance support functioning oversight. Takeover and stockholder-action restrictions temper accountability. SEC closure without an intended enforcement recommendation is relevant favorable evidence, without proving all historical allegations false or establishing exceptional governance.

Sources and methodology

Current publication · Updated 19/10/2026 · Version 5

AI interpretation based on checked source excerpts. Issuer assertions and evidence limitations remain explicit.

Policy quality-scores-2: six equally weighted categories. The overall score requires full coverage. Missing inputs are not zero. Qualitative grades are sourced interpretations, not probabilities. 3/6 · 19/10/2026

Moat56

Equal-weight average of four evidence-backed rubric grades (0–4), scaled to 100.

structural advantage · 3/4 · Existing global infrastructure, customer critical mass and the reported historical benefit of carrier neutrality support a meaningful current network advantage. Its strength relative to individual competitors is not quantified.

durability · 2/4 · An established ecosystem and repeated historical advantage support persistence, but local carrier limitations and alternative interconnection models make protection uneven. Exceptional durability is not demonstrated.

customer dependency · 2/4 · Partner adjacency and contracts in renewal periods support ongoing customer usefulness and dependency. Most interconnection revenue can be terminated without significant penalties, and migration costs are not quantified.

erosion resilience · 2/4 · The historical network advantage persists in the disclosures, but existing carrier limitations and power constraints expose vulnerabilities. Bypass models and redirected capacity are plausible future threats rather than demonstrated company-wide erosion.

Pricing power—

Insufficient evidence for every rubric criterion; no category score is inferred.

realized pricing · — · Scheduled price increases are disclosed, but no supplied outcome separates achieved pricing from volume, mix or currency. Possible competitive price adjustments do not establish realized cuts.

retention · 2/4 · Contracts already in renewal periods, recurring-revenue disclosures and customer adjacency support repeat demand indirectly. No retention rate is supplied, and significant interconnection termination flexibility limits the inference.

margin resilience · 3/4 · Comparable consolidated results demonstrate margin resilience. Q1 2026 GAAP operating margin increased to 23.6% from 20.6% a year earlier, while gross margin held near 51.5% versus 51.3%. Q2 gross margin increased to 53.1% from 52.0%; first-half gross margin rose to 52.3% from 51.6%. Reported adjusted EBITDA margins reached 51% in Q1 and 53% in Q2. These realized results support strong resilience, although Q2 benefited from one-time xScale fees and the passages do not isolate cost pass-through or establish exceptional durability.

contractual freedom · 2/4 · Scheduled price increases demonstrate some contractual pricing provision, while renewal periods permit periodic renegotiation. Customer termination rights constrain enforceability of future revenue; unilateral repricing authority and power-cost pass-through terms are not supplied.

Predictability87

Five consecutive annual periods. Equal weights: nondeclining revenue frequency; revenue-growth volatility (5–40pp); positive FCF frequency; FCF-margin volatility (3–20pp). Stability indicator, not a growth forecast.

Nondeclining revenue years (%)
100.00
Revenue growth volatility (pp)
2.80
Positive FCF years (%)
60.00
FCF margin volatility (pp)
5.14

Financial strength—

Missing required inputs: debtFcfGrade, netDebtEbitGrade. Equal-weight grades: debt/FCF (1–8x), net debt/earnings before interest and tax (0–5x), interest service (1–12x), current ratio (0.75–2x). Earnings use reported operating income, or reported pretax profit plus reported interest expense when operating income is unavailable. Interest service uses earnings/interest expense; if unavailable, it uses reported operating cash flow/cash interest paid, without relabeling cash paid as accrued expense. Nonpositive cash flow/earnings score 0 for their service component; reported zero interest with a positive numerator scores 100. Net cash scores 100 for net leverage. Missing disclosures remain unavailable. General nonfinancial-company rubric, not a credit rating; exceptional and nonoperating gains are not normalized out. IFRS finance-cost and cash-flow classifications retain their reported scope.

interestCoverageGrade
22.79
currentRatioGrade
45.32
Interest coverage (x)
3.51
Current ratio (x)
1.32

Capital allocation—

Missing required inputs: operatingReturn. Three-year equal-weight indicators: pretax return on average invested capital (0–25%; equity + debt − cash, each year and its prior year), share-count growth (0–5%, lower better), share-based cost/revenue (2–20%, lower better), consolidated FCF/net income (0–1x). Return uses reported operating income or, if unavailable, EBIT calculated from reported pretax profit plus reported interest expense; exceptional/nonoperating gains are not normalized out. Share-based cost uses the reported cash-flow add-back or, if absent, separately reported recognized compensation expense; the latter never becomes an FCF adjustment. Nonpositive net income scores 0 for cash conversion; absent income/FCF stays unavailable. Nonpositive invested capital has no defined return and remains unavailable. Does not establish acquisition quality or buyback timing.

3-year average dilution (%)
2.25
3-year average SBC / revenue (%)
5.22
cashConversionGrade
6.97

Management56

Equal-weight average of four evidence-backed rubric grades (0–4), scaled to 100.

capital discipline · 2/4 · Reported AFFO per-share growth and higher first-half diluted EPS provide positive outcome evidence despite dilution. Capital expenditure rose to $4.311 billion in 2025, financing includes actual share issuance, and substantial commitments remain. The $160 million Equinix Metal impairment is a realized allocation failure. Missing project returns and cash-flow totals limit the assessment.

incentive alignment · 3/4 · Actual 2026 grants include revenue, AFFO per-share and TSR conditions with multiyear service requirements, demonstrating meaningful equity and performance alignment. The financial performance period is only one year, actual ownership balances are absent, and grants are not assumed earned or vested.

execution · 2/4 · Reported revenue and AFFO growth, improved power efficiency, completed restructuring and higher first-half diluted EPS demonstrate execution through operating outcomes. The Metal impairment and actual permitting delays make the record mixed; these results do not establish exceptional management causality.

governance · 2/4 · Independent committees and high actual director attendance support functioning oversight. Takeover and stockholder-action restrictions temper accountability. SEC closure without an intended enforcement recommendation is relevant favorable evidence, without proving all historical allegations false or establishing exceptional governance.

Evidence

As more customers choose Equinix for high connectivity and performance reliability at the metro edge, it benefits their suppliers and business partners to colocate in the same data centers and connect directly with each other.

Business: customer and partner colocation adjacency · Filed 11/02/2026

This adjacency creates a network effect that attracts new customers while continuously enhancing our value proposition to existing customers and enabling them to capture further economic and performance benefits from our offerings.

Business: issuer explanation of network effects · Filed 11/02/2026

Our extensive global footprint spans 280 data centers, in 77 markets in 36 countries.

Competitive advantage: existing global footprint · Filed 11/02/2026

To date, the network neutrality of our IBX data centers and the variety of networks available to our customers has often been a competitive advantage for us.

Risk factors: historical competitive advantage from neutrality and network variety · Filed 29/07/2026

The Equinix global platform, and the quality of our IBX and xScale data centers, interconnection offerings and edge solutions, have enabled us to establish a critical mass of customers.

Business: established customer critical mass · Filed 16/02/2024

In certain of our markets, the limited number of carriers available reduces that advantage.

Risk factors: existing geographic limitations in carrier diversity · Filed 29/07/2026

As a result, we may need to adapt our key revenue-generating offerings and pricing to be competitive in those markets.

Risk factors: possible adaptation of offerings and pricing · Filed 29/07/2026

Some of our competitors may adopt aggressive pricing policies, especially if they are not highly leveraged or have lower return thresholds than we do.

Competition: possible aggressive competitor pricing · Filed 29/07/2026

In addition, if the market was to experience an event of excess data center capacity, capacity originally developed to serve wholesale or hyperscale requirements could be redirected toward the enterprise colocation markets in which we operate, increasing available supply and intensifying competition and pricing pressure in our core business.

Competition: potential redirection of hyperscale capacity · Filed 29/07/2026

Similarly, with growing acceptance of cloud-based technologies, we are at risk of losing customers that may decide to fully leverage cloud infrastructure offerings instead of managing their own.

Competition: cloud substitution risk · Filed 29/07/2026

In addition, certain network, cloud and content providers may seek to offer connectivity and interconnection through alternative models that bypass colocation environments, and increased customer adoption of these alternatives could reduce demand for our interconnection offerings.

Competition: alternative interconnection models · Filed 29/07/2026

As power, not space, is a limiting factor in many of our IBX data centers, our ability to fully utilize the space in those IBX data centers may be impacted.

Risk factors: power as an existing facility constraint · Filed 29/04/2026

Included in the remaining performance obligations are contracts that are either under the initial term or under one-year renewal periods.

Revenue recognition: contracts in initial terms and renewal periods · Filed 29/07/2026

Actual amounts and timing of revenue recognition may differ from these estimates due to changes in actual deployment dates, contract modifications, scheduled price increases, renewals and/or terminations.

Revenue recognition: scheduled price increases and contract modifications · Filed 29/07/2026

The remaining performance obligations do not include variable consideration related to unsatisfied performance obligations such as the usage of metered power, service fees from xScale® data centers that are based on future events or actual costs incurred in the future, or any contracts that could be terminated without any significant penalties including the majority of interconnection revenues.

Revenue recognition: termination rights and interconnection exclusions · Filed 29/07/2026

We use consistent one-year financial performance metrics across our annual and long-term incentives because in our highly recurring revenue business, strong short-term financial performance in year one creates a contracted revenue base for future years.

Compensation discussion: issuer description of recurring revenue and contracted demand · Filed 02/04/2026

REVENUES (in millions) +5% AFFO +12% AFFO(1)/Share +9% STOCK PRICE PERFORMANCE(2) +19% Reinvested dividends $48.34 End Price $751.86 (1)For a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to the corresponding GAAP measure, please refer to Appendix A of this proxy statement.

Performance highlights: reported revenue and AFFO growth · Filed 02/04/2026

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued) We provide the following additional segment disclosures for the years ended December 31 (in millions): 2025 2024 2023 Depreciation and amortization: Americas $ 1,137 $ 1,119 $ 1,001 EMEA 538 530 501 Asia-Pacific 375 360 343 Total $ 2,050 $ 2,009 $ 1,845 Capital expenditures: Americas $ 2,743 $ 1,838 $ 1,627 EMEA 1,027 808 717 Asia-Pacific 541 420 437 Total $ 4,311 $ 3,066 $ 2,781 Our long-lived assets, including property, plant and equipment, net and operating lease right-of-use assets, were located in the following geographic regions as of December 31 (in millions): Property, plant and equipment, net Operating lease right-of-use assets 2025 2024 2025 2024 Americas (1) $ 10,840 $ 9,193 $ 340 $ 389 EMEA 8,314 6,405 449 398 Asia-Pacific 4,430 3,651 603 632 Total $ 23,584 $ 19,249 $ 1,392 $ 1,419 (1)Property, plant and equipment, net of $8.5 billion and $7.2 billion and operating lease right-of-use assets of $322 million and $368 million were located in the U.S.

Segment disclosures: actual capital expenditures · Filed 11/02/2026

Material Cash Commitments As of June 30, 2026, our principal commitments were primarily comprised of: •approximately $19.9 billion of principal from our senior notes (gross of debt issuance costs and debt discounts); •approximately $4.5 billion of interest on senior notes, mortgage payable, other loans payable and term loans, based on their respective interest rates and recognized over the life of these instruments, and the credit facility fee for the revolving credit facility; •$20 million of principal from our mortgage payable, other loans payable and term loans (gross of debt issuance costs and debt discounts); •approximately $5.0 billion of total lease payments, which represents lease payments under finance and operating lease arrangements, including renewal options that are reasonably certain to be exercised; 58 Table of Contents •approximately $6.1 billion of unaccrued capital expenditure contractual commitments, primarily for IBX equipment not yet delivered and labor not yet provided in connection with the work necessary to complete construction and open IBX data center expansion projects prior to making them available to customers for installation, the majority of which is payable within the next 12 months; and •approximately $2.1 billion of other non-capital purchase commitments, such as commitments to purchase power in select locations and other open purchase orders, which contractually bind us for goods, services or arrangements to be delivered or provided during the remainder of 2026 and beyond, the majority of which is payable within the next two years.

Liquidity: debt, lease and purchase commitments at June 30, 2026 · Filed 29/07/2026

During the year ended December 31, 2025, we sold 107,493 shares on a spot basis under the 2024 ATM Program for approximately $99 million, net of commissions and other offering expenses.

Stockholders' equity: actual 2025 ATM share issuance · Filed 11/02/2026

In addition, we recorded an impairment charge of $160 million associated with the Equinix Metal Wind Down during the year ended December 31, 2024, as described in Note 17.

Restructuring: realized Equinix Metal impairment · Filed 12/02/2025

31 Table of Contents EQUINIX, INC. NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued) (Unaudited) Stock-Based Compensation For the six months ended June 30, 2026, the Talent, Culture and Compensation Committee and/or the Stock Awards Committee of our Board of Directors, as the case may be, granted an aggregate of 823,920 restricted stock units ("RSUs") to certain employees, including executive officers.

Stock-based compensation: actual 2026 RSU grants · Filed 29/07/2026

These equity awards are subject to vesting provisions and have a weighted-average grant date fair value of $960.40 per share and a weighted-average requisite service period of 3.67 years.

Stock-based compensation: vesting provisions and requisite service period · Filed 29/07/2026

We use revenues and adjusted funds from operations ("AFFO") per share as the performance measurements in the RSUs with both service and performance conditions that were granted in the six months ended June 30, 2026.

Stock-based compensation: revenue and AFFO per-share performance conditions · Filed 29/07/2026

We used total shareholder return ("TSR") as the performance measurement in the RSUs with a service and market condition that were granted in the six months ended June 30, 2026.

Stock-based compensation: TSR conditions on granted awards · Filed 29/07/2026

Accordingly, the one-year performance period is followed by a two-year service period to encourage leadership retention and continued performance.

Compensation discussion: financial performance and subsequent service periods · Filed 02/04/2026

With the exception of the Stock Award Committee, all committees consist entirely of independent directors.

Governance: committee independence · Filed 02/04/2026

For the fiscal year, each of the incumbent directors attended or participated in at least 92% of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings of the Board and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all committees of the Board on which each such director served.

Governance: actual director meeting attendance · Filed 02/04/2026

Such provisions include: •ownership limitations and transfer restrictions relating to our stock that are intended to facilitate our compliance with certain REIT rules relating to share ownership; •authorization for the issuance of "blank check" preferred stock; •the prohibition of cumulative voting in the election of directors; •limits on the persons who may call special meetings of stockholders; •limits on stockholder action by written consent; and •advance notice requirements for nominations to the Board of Directors or for proposing matters that can be acted on by stockholders at stockholder meetings.

Governance risks: takeover and stockholder-action restrictions · Filed 29/07/2026

On November 19, 2025, we received correspondence from the SEC indicating that the agency had concluded its investigation and does not intend to recommend an enforcement action.

Investigations: SEC closure without intended enforcement recommendation · Filed 29/07/2026

In 2024, we achieved an annual average operational PUE of 1.39, a 6% improvement from 2023, despite an expanded portfolio.

Sustainability operations: achieved 2024 power-efficiency improvement · Filed 11/02/2026

The activities under the Q4 2024 Restructuring Plan were completed by March 31, 2025 with no further costs expected to be incurred.

Restructuring: completed organizational realignment · Filed 11/02/2026

Earnings Per Share The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share ("EPS") for the periods presented ($ in millions except per share data; share data in thousands): Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 2025 2026 2025 Net income $ 477 $ 367 $ 892 $ 710 Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests 2 1 2 1 Net income attributable to common stockholders $ 479 $ 368 $ 894 $ 711 Weighted-average shares used to calculate basic EPS 98,641 97,835 98,516 97,674 Effect of dilutive securities: Employee equity awards 495 215 415 294 Weighted-average shares used to calculate diluted EPS 99,136 98,050 98,931 97,968 EPS attributable to common stockholders: Basic EPS $ 4.86 $ 3.76 $ 9.07 $ 7.28 Diluted EPS $ 4.83 $ 3.75 $ 9.04 $ 7.26 The following table sets forth potential shares of common stock that are not included in the diluted EPS calculation above because to do so would be anti-dilutive for the periods presented (in thousands): Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 2025 2026 2025 Common stock related to employee equity awards 2 219 108 145 Forward equity sale agreements 163 — 55 — 4.

Earnings per share: first-half 2026 income, dilution and comparative results · Filed 29/07/2026

We are currently experiencing permitting delays in most metros.

Construction risks: actual permitting delays in most metros · Filed 11/02/2026

Actual amounts and timing of revenue recognition may differ from these estimates due to changes in actual deployment dates, contract modifications, scheduled price increases, renewals and/or terminations.

Remaining performance obligations: scheduled price increases and revenue-recognition uncertainty · Filed 29/07/2026

As a result, we may suffer from pricing pressure that would adversely affect our ability to generate revenues.

Competition risk: potential pricing pressure · Filed 29/07/2026

(in millions, except share and per share data) (unaudited) Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 December 31, 2025 March 31, 2025 Recurring revenues $ 2,331 $ 2,294 $ 2,087 Non-recurring revenues 113 126 138 Revenues 2,444 2,420 2,225 Cost of revenues 1,186 1,198 1,084 Gross profit 1,258 1,222 1,141 Operating expenses: Sales and marketing 241 234 229 General and administrative 444 481 438 Restructuring and other exit charges 6 16 10 Transaction costs 8 6 6 Impairment charges 2 63 — (Gain) loss on asset sales (20) — — Total operating expenses 681 800 683 Income from operations 577 422 458 Interest and other income (expense): Interest income 41 41 47 Interest expense (148) (142) (122) Other income (expense) (unaudited) Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 March 31, 2025 Cash flows from operating activities: Net income $ 415 $ 343 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

Unaudited quarterly financial results: March 2026 and March 2025 revenues, gross profit and operating income; dollars in millions · Filed 29/04/2026

◦$4.20 per share, a 20% increase over the same quarter of the previous year •Adjusted EBITDA ◦$1.245 billion, a record adjusted EBITDA margin of 51%, a 17% increase over the same quarter of the previous year on an as-reported basis, or a 13% increase on a normalized and constant currency basis •AFFO and AFFO per Share ◦$1.065 billion, a 12% increase over the same quarter of the previous year on an as-reported basis, or an 11% increase on a normalized and constant currency basis driven by strong operating performance Foreign Exchange Impact Revised FY 2026 Guidance Q2 2026 Guidance $10,123 - 10,223 +$20 $10,144 - 10,244 $2,571 - 2,611 Adjusted EBITDA Margin % $5,141 - 5,221 ~51% +$23 $5,165 - 5,245 ~51% $1,349 - 1,389 52 - 53% Recurring Capital Expenditures % of Revenues $270 - 290 ~3% +$11 ($1) $280 - 300 ~3% $46 - 66 2 - 3% Adjustments for (gain) loss on asset dispositions

First-quarter 2026 results summary: realized adjusted EBITDA and margin · Filed 29/04/2026

(in millions, except share and per share data) (unaudited) Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 March 31, 2026 June 30, 2025 June 30, 2026 June 30, 2025 Recurring revenues $ 2,377 $ 2,331 $ 2,143 $ 4,708 $ 4,230 Non-recurring revenues 248 113 113 361 251 Revenues 2,625 2,444 2,256 5,069 4,481 Cost of revenues 1,230 1,186 1,084 2,416 2,168 Gross profit 1,395 1,258 1,172 2,653 2,313 Operating expenses: Sales and marketing 239 241 221 480 450 General and administrative 462 444 451 906 889 Restructuring and other exit charges 6 6 2 12 12 Transaction costs 3 8 3 11 9 Impairment charges 17 2 1 19 1 (Gain) loss on asset sales 3 (20) — (17) — Total operating expenses 730 681 678 We define cash sales and marketing expense as sales and marketing expense less depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation as presented below.

Unaudited financial results: June 2026 and June 2025 quarterly and six-month revenues and gross profit; dollars in millions · Filed 29/07/2026

1 Second-Quarter 2026 Results Summary •Revenues ◦$2.625 billion, a 16% increase over the same quarter of the previous year on both an as-reported basis and a normalized and constant currency basis driven by strong underlying performance and one-time xScale® fees •Operating Income ◦$665 million, a 35% increase over the same quarter of the previous year, primarily from strong underlying operating performance and the impact of one-time xScale fees

Second-quarter 2026 results summary: revenue, operating income and one-time xScale fees · Filed 29/07/2026

◦$4.83 per share, a 29% increase over the same quarter of the previous year •Adjusted EBITDA ◦$1.396 billion, a record adjusted EBITDA margin of 53%, representing a 24% increase over the same quarter of the previous year on an as-reported basis, or a 22% increase on a normalized and constant currency basis •AFFO and AFFO per Share ◦$1.168 billion, a 20% increase over the same quarter of the previous year on an as-reported basis, or a 19% increase on a normalized and constant currency basis driven by strong operating performance and one-time xScale fees

Second-quarter 2026 results summary: realized adjusted EBITDA margin and one-time fee contribution · Filed 29/07/2026

Actual amounts and timing of revenue recognition may differ from these estimates due to changes in actual deployment dates, contract modifications, scheduled price increases, renewals and/or terminations.

Remaining Performance Obligations · Filed 29/07/2026

•Grew monthly recurring revenue 11% on both an as-reported basis and a normalized and constant currency basis year over year

Second-quarter 2026 monthly recurring revenue growth · Filed 29/07/2026

As a result, we may suffer from pricing pressure that would adversely affect our ability to generate revenues.

Competitive pricing risk disclosure · Filed 29/07/2026

Publication history

Publication history
VersionUpdatedCompetitive advantage
519/10/2026narrow
418/10/2026narrow
318/10/2026narrow
218/10/2026narrow
118/10/2026Unavailable

Sources

Research methodology and limitations · What is an economic moat?