Skip to content

Northern Trust

NASDAQ: NTRS · USD

Northern Trust (NTRS) Economic Moat Analysis—

Competitive advantages, dated evidence and erosion risks.

Uncertain economic moat

Northern Trust’s servicing breadth, substantial client assets and growing fees suggest potential switching friction, but the supplied passages do not establish customer dependence or a comparative cost advantage. Recent results demonstrate earnings capacity and execution, without isolating realized pricing or durable competitive protection. Regulatory capital is strong, subject to preliminary September figures; funding concentration and securities losses qualify financial resilience. The uncertain verdict reflects insufficient evidence of moat existence and width, rather than demonstrated franchise-wide competitive weakness.

Switching costs

Custody, fund administration and investment operations outsourcing provide a plausible basis for operational switching friction. The disclosed service breadth is current; a durable customer switching-cost advantage remains unestablished.

Durability
Potentially persistent if clients depend on integrated workflows, but the catalog provides no migration costs, relationship tenure, termination terms or client-level retention evidence.
Competitors
Comparison not established
Erosion risks
Service breadth alone does not establish dependence. Organic fee growth can coexist with client departures, while market movements and business mix can increase fees without stronger competitive protection.
What would invalidate the thesis
The hypothesis would weaken if disclosed migrations proved inexpensive or rapid, or if sustained client losses and fee concessions showed that integrated services did not protect relationships.
Evidence (4) · Counterevidence (1)

Changes since the previous analysis

  • Retained the uncertain moat verdict: the current catalog establishes business breadth and operating improvement but does not demonstrate durable switching costs or comparative cost leadership.
  • Changed realized_pricing and contractual_freedom from numerical grades to null. The previous analysis's competitive-pricing impairment, fee-waiver and individually negotiated open-ended contract evidence is absent from this catalog.
  • Reassessed management alignment using disclosed incentive mix, vesting, actual ownership compliance and recoupment. Prior claims about specific ROE performance conditions and completed award distributions are not carried forward.
  • Reassessed capital allocation without the previous analysis's unsupported 111% annual payout, productivity reinvestment and seed-investment commitments claims.
  • Removed the prior asset-liability discussion's unsupported duration, charge-off and June AFS-loss comparisons; the current assessment uses disclosed September losses and credit provision.

Evidence limitations

  • All selected passages are issuer disclosures. Reported results and contractual compensation arrangements support numerical assessments, but promotional leadership and resilience claims do not establish exceptional durability.
  • No named entity is established as a competitor in the supplied passages. Companies mentioned in executive biographies, board service or transaction descriptions are not treated as competitors.
  • Client-level retention, migration costs, relationship tenure, fee-rate changes and customer pricing rights are absent. Fee growth and client-asset growth do not isolate price, volume and mix.
  • September 2026 regulatory capital and resulting ratios are preliminary until the Form 10-Q is filed. Corporation and principal-bank scopes remain distinct.
  • Uninsured-deposit concentration, depositor-level concentration, current detailed loan quality and quantified interest-rate sensitivity are unavailable.
  • Financial assessments use sources filed in 2026, within 550 days of the assessment date. Filing dates are retained as filed dates, not retrieval or separately inferred publication dates.

Financial indicators to test against the thesis

Calculated from annual filings. Missing data remains unavailable. Detailed financial charts remain in the other topics.

Financial indicators to test against the thesis
PeriodGross marginOperating marginROICFCF margin
2021———19.5%
2022———33.5%
2023———37.0%
2024———-7.1%
2025———67.5%

Pricing power—

  • Pricing outcomes

    Third-quarter servicing fees rose 8% year over year, but client assets are explicitly a fee driver. Neither aggregate fee growth nor organic trust-fee growth separates repricing from business volume and mix. The catalog supplies no observed fee-rate outcome sufficient for a numerical pricing assessment.

  • Customer demand

    Growing servicing fees and management's report of organic trust-fee growth across all three businesses support continuing demand indirectly. They do not distinguish retained customers from new business or quantify departures. This supports mixed retention evidence without establishing a retention rate or price-resistant loyalty.

  • Margin resilience

    GAAP pre-tax margin improved to 34.7% in third-quarter 2026 from 30.6% a year earlier. Current-quarter gains and second-quarter restructuring charges complicate durability and attribution. The improvement supports mixed demonstrated resilience, but does not itself prove fee-pricing protection.

  • Pricing freedom

    The supplied passages do not disclose customer-contract duration, repricing rights, termination provisions or minimum fee commitments. The linkage between client assets and fees explains a revenue driver but does not establish Northern Trust's ability to change customer prices or terms.

Management69

  • Capital discipline

    Actual repurchases and higher declared dividends accompany substantial regulatory capital buffers. Software disposition and severance charges show costs of prior investment and organizational decisions. Capital deployment is demonstrated, but repurchase value creation and the returns on reinvestment remain unestablished.

  • Incentive alignment

    Disclosed compensation emphasizes multiyear equity, including performance units with three-year cliff vesting. All named executive officers exceeded ownership guidelines at December 31, 2025, and awards carry risk-related recoupment. Partial credit for unvested restricted units qualifies ownership alignment; exceptional shareholder outcomes are not established.

  • Execution

    Third-quarter servicing fees increased 8% and net income increased 40% year over year. Management also reports substantial positive operating leverage excluding notable items. These are strong, indirect execution indicators, qualified by transaction gains and a lower effective tax rate rather than attributed entirely to management.

  • Governance

    Majority-independent directors, shareholder meeting rights and the absence of a staggered board or poison pill support accountability. Actual attendance and completed director elections show mechanisms operating. The combined Chairman and CEO roles qualify independence, while effectiveness during a serious governance challenge remains untested.

Sources and methodology

Current publication · Updated 23/10/2026 · Version 14

AI interpretation based on checked source excerpts. Issuer assertions and evidence limitations remain explicit.

Policy quality-scores-3: six equally weighted categories. The overall score requires full coverage. Missing inputs are not zero. Qualitative grades are sourced interpretations, not probabilities. 4/6 · 31/10/2026

Moat—

Insufficient evidence for every rubric criterion; no category score is inferred.

structural advantage · — · The full servicing suite and $17.4 trillion of Asset Servicing AUC/A at December 31, 2025 establish substantial operating scope. They do not establish lower unit costs, exclusive assets, network effects or demonstrable switching barriers. A comparative structural advantage therefore remains unassessable.

durability · — · Current scale and organic fee growth do not reveal how long any competitive protection persists. The passages contain no relationship-tenure distribution, migration experience or durable exclusivity. Improved earnings cannot fill that gap, so the durability of an economic moat remains unestablished.

customer dependency · — · Custody, administration and operations outsourcing could embed Northern Trust in client workflows. However, the catalog does not disclose integration depth, replacement difficulty or customer consequences of switching. Service availability is insufficient to grade demonstrated dependence.

erosion resilience · — · Fee growth and positive operating leverage demonstrate recent business progress, but the passages do not identify a competitive challenge and show an established advantage surviving it. They therefore cannot establish resistance to moat erosion or distinguish durable protection from favorable operating conditions.

Pricing power—

Insufficient evidence for every rubric criterion; no category score is inferred.

realized pricing · — · Third-quarter servicing fees rose 8% year over year, but client assets are explicitly a fee driver. Neither aggregate fee growth nor organic trust-fee growth separates repricing from business volume and mix. The catalog supplies no observed fee-rate outcome sufficient for a numerical pricing assessment.

retention · 2/4 · Growing servicing fees and management's report of organic trust-fee growth across all three businesses support continuing demand indirectly. They do not distinguish retained customers from new business or quantify departures. This supports mixed retention evidence without establishing a retention rate or price-resistant loyalty.

margin resilience · 2/4 · GAAP pre-tax margin improved to 34.7% in third-quarter 2026 from 30.6% a year earlier. Current-quarter gains and second-quarter restructuring charges complicate durability and attribution. The improvement supports mixed demonstrated resilience, but does not itself prove fee-pricing protection.

contractual freedom · — · The supplied passages do not disclose customer-contract duration, repricing rights, termination provisions or minimum fee commitments. The linkage between client assets and fees explains a revenue driver but does not establish Northern Trust's ability to change customer prices or terms.

Predictability90

Financial-sector stability over 5 consecutive reported annual periods: equal weights for nondeclining revenue frequency, revenue-growth volatility (5–40pp), positive consolidated earnings frequency, and net-income/revenue margin volatility (3–20pp). Uses reported accounting scope; not industrial FCF or a growth forecast.

Nondeclining revenue years (%)
75.00
Revenue growth volatility (pp)
9.70
positiveEarningsShare
100.00
netMarginStdDev
2.96
observedAnnualPeriods
5.00

Financial strength63

Qualitative bank assessment: equal-weight average of four current evidence-backed grades (0–4), scaled to 100. Policy financial-industry-1; not an industrial ratio score or credit rating.

capital adequacy · 3/4 · Preliminary September 2026 standardized CET1 was 12.4% for the Corporation against the disclosed 7.0% regulatory minimum. The principal Bank's 11.7% CET1 and other ratios exceeded its disclosed well-capitalized thresholds. These support strong capital adequacy, without implying exceptional protection or guaranteed future sufficiency.

liquidity funding · 2/4 · Highly liquid assets covered 65% of average deposits, including 27% covered by cash and central-bank deposits. Third-quarter average deposits rose 6% year over year but fell 3% sequentially, with most supplied by Asset Servicing. Missing uninsured and depositor-level concentration data constrain confidence in funding stability.

asset liability risk · 2/4 · Third-quarter credit provision was $5.4 million, while September after-tax unrealized AFS securities losses were $547.0 million. These show earnings remained positive alongside identifiable credit and market exposures. Detailed loan quality, duration and interest-rate sensitivities are absent, limiting the assessment to mixed observed risk evidence.

earnings resilience · 3/4 · Third-quarter net income of $642.9 million exceeded $457.6 million a year earlier, alongside 8% servicing-fee growth. Positive operating leverage excluding notable items supports underlying earnings capacity. Gains and lower taxes qualify the result, and the supplied period does not demonstrate severe-cycle durability.

Capital allocation56

Qualitative bank assessment: equal-weight average of four current evidence-backed grades (0–4), scaled to 100. Policy financial-industry-1; not an industrial ratio score or credit rating.

capital efficiency · 3/4 · Corporation-wide return on average common equity reached 20.1% in third-quarter 2026 versus 14.8% a year earlier. This demonstrates strong current accounting capital productivity. Transaction gains and lower taxes support reported returns, limiting conclusions about recurring efficiency and sustainability through a weaker environment.

distributions and buffers · 2/4 · Third-quarter repurchases cost $352.3 million, with $161.9 million of common and $16.2 million of preferred dividends declared, against $642.9 million net income. Substantial preliminary regulatory buffers support these actions. Notable gains, tax benefits and limited through-cycle payout evidence temper a stronger assessment.

dilution and cost · 2/4 · Outstanding common shares fell from 186,337,588 at December 31, 2025 to 182,955,653 at June 30, 2026, demonstrating net share reduction alongside actual repurchases. The $33.1 million employee equity-grant expense qualifies that benefit. Full recurring compensation and financing-cost attribution remain unavailable.

investment discipline · 2/4 · Improving servicing fees and operating leverage provide indirect evidence that the operating platform is producing results. However, a $61.5 million software disposition charge and $51.0 million severance charge qualify investment execution. Project-level returns and a complete comparison of committed spending against outcomes are unavailable.

Management69

Equal-weight average of four evidence-backed rubric grades (0–4), scaled to 100.

capital discipline · 2/4 · Actual repurchases and higher declared dividends accompany substantial regulatory capital buffers. Software disposition and severance charges show costs of prior investment and organizational decisions. Capital deployment is demonstrated, but repurchase value creation and the returns on reinvestment remain unestablished.

incentive alignment · 3/4 · Disclosed compensation emphasizes multiyear equity, including performance units with three-year cliff vesting. All named executive officers exceeded ownership guidelines at December 31, 2025, and awards carry risk-related recoupment. Partial credit for unvested restricted units qualifies ownership alignment; exceptional shareholder outcomes are not established.

execution · 3/4 · Third-quarter servicing fees increased 8% and net income increased 40% year over year. Management also reports substantial positive operating leverage excluding notable items. These are strong, indirect execution indicators, qualified by transaction gains and a lower effective tax rate rather than attributed entirely to management.

governance · 3/4 · Majority-independent directors, shareholder meeting rights and the absence of a staggered board or poison pill support accountability. Actual attendance and completed director elections show mechanisms operating. The combined Chairman and CEO roles qualify independence, while effectiveness during a serious governance challenge remains untested.

Evidence

Asset servicing and related services encompass a full range of capabilities including but not limited to: custody; fund administration; investment operations outsourcing; investment management; investment risk and analytical services; employee benefit services; securities lending; foreign exchange; treasury management; brokerage services; transition management services; banking; and cash management.

2025 Form 10-K, Asset Servicing capabilities; filed 2026-02-24 · Filed 24/02/2026

At December 31, 2025, total Asset Servicing assets under custody/administration (AUC/A), assets under custody, and assets under management (AUM) were $17.4 trillion, $13.6 trillion, and $1.3 trillion, respectively.

2025 Form 10-K, Asset Servicing client assets at December 31, 2025; filed 2026-02-24 · Filed 24/02/2026

All three businesses delivered organic trust-fee growth, reflecting strong execution across the company.

Third-quarter 2026 earnings release, CEO statement on organic trust-fee growth; filed 2026-10-21 · Filed 21/10/2026

($ In Millions except per share data) Q3 2026 Q2 2026(1)(2) Q3 2025 Q2 2026 Q3 2025 Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees $ 1,373.0 $ 1,349.5 $ 1,265.5 2 % 8 % Other Noninterest Income 250.0 673.0 169.1 (63) 48 Net Interest Income (FTE*) 679.1 683.1 596.3 (1) 14 Total Revenue (FTE*) $ 2,302.1 $ 2,705.6 $ 2,030.9 (15) % 13 % Noninterest Expense $ 1,492.5 $ 1,638.6 $ 1,422.9 (9) % 5 % Provision for Credit Losses 5.4 (5.3) (17.0) N/M N/M Provision for Income Taxes 153.6 272.5 161.9 (44) (5) FTE Adjustment* 7.7 7.6 5.5 1 41 Net Income $ 642.9 $ 792.2 $ 457.6 (19) % 40 % Earnings Allocated to Common Shares $ 621.9 $ 782.2 $ 437.2 (20) % 42 % Diluted Earnings per Common Share $ 3.40 $ 4.23 $ 2.29 (20) 48 Return on Average Common Equity 20.1 % 25.9 % 14.8 % Average Assets $ 159,235.9 $ 163,575.8 $ 151,041.5 (3) % 5 % (1) For Q2 2026, Other Noninterest Income included a $525.4 million gain related to Northern Trust's participation in the second Visa Exchange Offer and a $73.9 million loss on available for sale debt securities sold in conjunction with a repositioning of the portfolio.

Third-quarter 2026 earnings release, financial summary and second-quarter transaction items; filed 2026-10-21 · Filed 21/10/2026

N/M - Not meaningful NORTHERN TRUST CORPORATION THIRD QUARTER 2026 RESULTS CLIENT ASSETS Assets under custody/administration (AUC/A) and assets under management are a driver of the Corporation’s trust, investment and other servicing fees, the largest component of noninterest income.

Third-quarter 2026 earnings release, relationship between client assets and servicing fees; filed 2026-10-21 · Filed 21/10/2026

QUARTERS 2026 2025 ($ in Millions) THIRD SECOND FIRST FOURTH THIRD Net Interest Income Interest Income - GAAP $ 2,073.1 $ 2,189.3 $ 2,234.0 $ 2,126.6 $ 2,144.3 Add: FTE Adjustment 7.7 7.6 7.6 12.7 5.5 Interest Income (FTE) - Non-GAAP $ 2,080.8 $ 2,196.9 $ 2,241.6 $ 2,139.3 $ 2,149.8 Net Interest Income - GAAP $ 671.4 $ 675.5 $ 654.0 $ 641.6 $ 590.8 Add: FTE Adjustment 7.7 7.6 7.6 12.7 5.5 Net Interest Income (FTE) - Non-GAAP $ 679.1 $ 683.1 $ 661.6 $ 654.3 $ 596.3 Net Interest Margin - GAAP(1) 1.80 % 1.79 % 1.73 % 1.78 % 1.68 % Net Interest Margin (FTE) - Non-GAAP(1) 1.83 % 1.81 % 1.75 % 1.81 % 1.70 % Total Revenue Total Revenue - GAAP $ 2,294.4 $ 2,698.0 $ 2,205.6 $ 2,123.1 $ 2,025.4 Add: FTE Adjustment 7.7 7.6 7.6 12.7 5.5 Total Revenue (FTE) - Non-GAAP $ 2,302.1 $ 2,705.6 $ 2,213.2 $ 2,135.8 $ 2,030.9 Income before Income Taxes Income before Income Taxes - GAAP $ 796.5 $ 1,064.7 $ 700.6 $ 633.8 $ 619.5 Add: FTE Adjustment 7.7 7.6 7.6 12.7 5.5 Income before Income Taxes (FTE) - Non-GAAP $ 804.2 $ 1,072.3 $ 708.2 $ 646.5 $ 625.0 Pre-Tax Margin - GAAP(2) 34.7 % 39.5 % 31.8 % 29.9 % 30.6 % Pre-Tax Margin (FTE) - Non-GAAP(2) 34.9 % 39.6 % 32.0 % 30.3 % 30.8 % (1) Net Interest Margin is calculated by dividing annualized net interest income by average interest-earning assets.

Third-quarter 2026 earnings release, GAAP/FTE reconciliation and net interest margin definition; filed 2026-10-21 · Filed 21/10/2026

(2) Pre-Tax Margin is calculated by dividing income before income taxes by total revenue.

Third-quarter 2026 earnings release, pre-tax margin definition; filed 2026-10-21 · Filed 21/10/2026

•$48.7 million (pre-tax) impact to Other Noninterest Income from notable items (after-tax $36.8 million):

Third-quarter 2026 earnings release, current-quarter notable income items; filed 2026-10-21 · Filed 21/10/2026

153.6 272.5 161.9 (44) (5) Net Income $ 642.9 $ 792.2 $ 457.6 (19)% 40% Effective Tax Rate 19.3 % 25.6 % 26.1 % (630) bps (680) bps bps - basis points The effective tax rate decreased sequentially and from the prior-year quarter primarily due to lower net tax impact from international operations, including a reduction in the current year valuation allowance attributable to U.S.

Third-quarter 2026 earnings release, net income and effective tax-rate explanation; filed 2026-10-21 · Filed 21/10/2026

(2) For Q2 2026, Noninterest Expense included a $61.5 million charge related to software dispositions, a $51.0 million severance-related charge, and a $33.1 million expense related to the the Invested as One equity grant to eligible employees.

Third-quarter 2026 earnings release, second-quarter software, severance and employee equity-grant charges; filed 2026-10-21 · Filed 21/10/2026

Compared to the prior year and excluding notable items, revenues grew 11%, while disciplined expense management generated more than 600 basis points of positive operating leverage.

Third-quarter 2026 earnings release, CEO statement on growth and operating leverage excluding notable items; filed 2026-10-21 · Filed 21/10/2026

During the current quarter, the Corporation declared cash dividends totaling $161.9 million to common stockholders and increased its quarterly cash dividend to $0.88 per share on common stock from the previous $0.80 per share.

Third-quarter 2026 earnings release, common dividends declared and dividend increase; filed 2026-10-21 · Filed 21/10/2026

The Corporation repurchased 1,901,679 shares of common stock, including 12,872 withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations related to share-based compensation, at a total cost of $352.3 million ($185.27 average price per share).

Third-quarter 2026 earnings release, actual common-share repurchases; filed 2026-10-21 · Filed 21/10/2026

The Corporation also declared cash dividends totaling $16.2 million to preferred stockholders during the current quarter.

Third-quarter 2026 earnings release, preferred dividends declared; filed 2026-10-21 · Filed 21/10/2026

($ In Millions) Standardized Approach Advanced Approach Northern Trust Corporation September 30, 2026* June 30, 2026 September 30, 2025 September 30, 2026* June 30, 2026 September 30, 2025 Well-Capitalized Ratios Minimum Capital Ratios Regulatory Capital Common Equity Tier 1 Capital $ 11,555.6 $ 11,605.6 $ 11,199.3 $ 11,555.6 $ 11,605.6 $ 11,199.3 Tier 1 Capital 12,368.5 12,418.7 12,028.1 12,368.5 12,418.7 12,028.1 Total Capital 14,650.7 14,706.5 13,581.9 14,466.1 14,516.2 13,375.2 Assets Risk-Weighted Assets $ 92,872.1 $ 95,157.3 $ 90,033.7 $ 80,490.5 $ 81,119.6 $ 74,329.4 Average Adjusted Total Assets 158,196.9 162,601.3 150,208.9 158,196.9 162,601.3 150,208.9 Supplementary Leverage Exposure N/A N/A N/A 144,826.4 144,498.8 135,904.7 Capital Ratios Common Equity Tier 1 Capital 12.4 % 12.2 % 12.4 % 14.4 % 14.3 % 15.1 % N/A 4.5 % Tier 1 Capital 13.3 13.1 13.4 15.4 15.3 16.2 6.0 6.0 Total Capital 15.8 15.5 15.1 18.0 17.9 18.0 10.0 8.0 Tier 1 Leverage 7.8 7.6 8.0 7.8 7.6 8.0 N/A 4.0 Supplementary Leverage N/A N/A N/A 8.5 8.6 8.9 N/A 3.0

Third-quarter 2026 earnings release, Northern Trust Corporation regulatory capital; filed 2026-10-21 · Filed 21/10/2026

Standardized Approach Advanced Approach The Northern Trust Company September 30, 2026* June 30, 2026 September 30, 2025 September 30, 2026* June 30, 2026 September 30, 2025 Well-Capitalized Ratios Minimum Capital Ratios Regulatory Capital Common Equity Tier 1 Capital $ 10,688.7 $ 11,084.4 $ 10,437.7 $ 10,688.7 $ 11,084.4 $ 10,437.7 Tier 1 Capital 10,688.7 11,084.4 10,437.7 10,688.7 11,084.4 10,437.7 Total Capital 12,623.3 13,024.6 11,644.4 12,438.7 12,834.4 11,437.7 Assets Risk-Weighted Assets $ 91,203.5 $ 93,697.1 $ 88,698.8 $ 77,834.5 $ 78,677.0 $ 72,031.5 Average Adjusted Total Assets 157,586.5 162,049.4 149,705.5 157,586.5 162,049.4 149,705.5 Supplementary Leverage Exposure N/A N/A N/A 143,848.2 143,562.4 135,400.9 Capital Ratios Common Equity Tier 1 Capital 11.7 % 11.8 % 11.8 % 13.7 % 14.1 % 14.5 % 6.5 % 4.5 % Tier 1 Capital 11.7 11.8 11.8 13.7 14.1 14.5 8.0 6.0 Total Capital 13.8 13.9 13.1 16.0 16.3 15.9 10.0 8.0 Tier 1 Leverage 6.8 6.8 7.0 6.8 6.8 7.0 5.0 4.0 Supplementary Leverage N/A N/A N/A 7.4 7.7 7.7 3.0 3.0 (*) Regulatory Capital, Risk-Weighted Assets and resulting ratios for the current quarter are considered preliminary until the Form 10-Q is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Third-quarter 2026 earnings release, The Northern Trust Company regulatory capital, thresholds and preliminary-data footnote; filed 2026-10-21 · Filed 21/10/2026

Standardized Tier 1 Leverage CAPITAL HIGHLIGHTS • Robust capital and liquidity ◦ $12.4 billion in Tier 1 capital ◦ 65% of average deposits covered by highly liquid assets including 27% by cash and central bank deposits ◦ Net unrealized after-tax losses on available-for-sale securities of $547.0 million as of September 30, 2026 • Declared $161.9 million in common stock dividends and $16.2 million in preferred stock dividends in 3Q 2026 • Repurchased $352.3 million of common stock in 3Q 2026 Northern Trust Corporation Capital Ratios 3Q 2026 Capital Ratios STANDARDIZED APPROACH ADVANCED APPROACH Common Equity Tier 1 Capital 12.4% 14.4% Tier 1 Capital 13.3% 15.4% Total Capital 15.8% 18.0% Tier 1 Leverage 7.8% 7.8% Supplementary Leverage N/A 8.5% Standardized Common Equity Tier 1 Capital Update 7.0% Regulatory Minimum 4.0% Regulatory Minimum

Third-quarter 2026 presentation, capital, liquidity coverage, AFS losses and regulatory minimum; filed 2026-10-21 · Filed 21/10/2026

Total Pre-Tax Margin (FTE*) 34.9 % 39.6 % 30.8 % (4.7) pts 4.1 pts Average Loans Asset Servicing $ 5,321.3 $ 5,800.6 $ 5,399.9 (8) % (1) % Wealth Management 36,409.6 35,767.0 36,100.7 2 1 Total Average Loans $ 41,730.9 $ 41,567.6 $ 41,500.6 — % 1 % Average Deposits Asset Servicing $ 95,765.9 $ 100,980.6 $ 90,195.3 (5) % 6 % Wealth Management 27,524.0 26,715.1 25,370.4 3 8 Other 130.1 150.0 1,134.9 (13) (89) Total Average Deposits $ 123,420.0 $ 127,845.7 $ 116,700.6 (3) % 6 % (1) The current quarter gain on the sale of the guardianship services business ($34.0 million) is included entirely within Wealth Management.

Third-quarter 2026 earnings release, segment average loans and deposits; filed 2026-10-21 · Filed 21/10/2026

Outstanding shares of 182,955,653 and 186,337,588 408.6 408.6 Additional Paid-In Capital 1,044.4 1,039.0 Retained Earnings 17,706.5 16,709.3 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (551.7) (590.5) Treasury Stock (62,215,871 and 58,833,936 shares, at cost) (6,091.1) (5,493.4) Total Stockholders’ Equity 13,401.6 12,957.9 Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity $ 179,297.2 $ 177,132.7 See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

June 2026 Form 10-Q, consolidated balance sheet outstanding shares and equity; filed 2026-07-30 · Filed 30/07/2026

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, the Corporation repurchased 2,129,047 and 4,617,195 shares of common stock, respectively, at a total cost of $350.6 million ($164.65 average price per share) and $709.5 million ($153.66 average price per share), respectively, including 4,861 and 456,475 shares withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations related to share-based compensation, respectively.

June 2026 Form 10-Q, three- and six-month common-share repurchases; filed 2026-07-30 · Filed 30/07/2026

Our long-term incentive mix further emphasizes performance-based pay, with 75% of the CEO’s total target incentive, and 70% of the total target incentive for the other named executive officers, delivered through long-term incentive awards.

2026 proxy, long-term incentive allocation for CEO and other named executive officers; filed 2026-03-11 · Filed 11/03/2026

Within long-term incentives, awards are predominantly performance-based, with 65% delivered in performance stock units, which cliff vest at the end of three-year performance period, and 35% delivered in restricted stock units, which vest ratably over a four-year period.

2026 proxy, performance-unit and restricted-unit mix and vesting periods; filed 2026-03-11 · Filed 11/03/2026

As of December 31, 2025, each of our named executive officers exceeded our stock ownership guidelines.

2026 proxy, actual executive ownership-guideline compliance at December 31, 2025; filed 2026-03-11 · Filed 11/03/2026

Net shares obtained through stock option exercise 50% CREDITED Unvested units related to time-based long-term incentive awards (restricted stock unit awards) 0% CREDITED Performance-based share awards (performance stock unit awards)

2026 proxy, ownership-guideline treatment of unvested restricted and performance units; filed 2026-03-11 · Filed 11/03/2026

Such awards also are subject to forfeiture and recoupment provisions relating to “ex-post” risk, meaning risk resulting from the recipient’s inappropriate risk-taking that does not materialize until after the performance period in which such inappropriate risk-taking takes place.

2026 proxy, forfeiture and recoupment for subsequently materializing inappropriate risk-taking; filed 2026-03-11 · Filed 11/03/2026

Stockholder Right to Call Special Meetings BOARD OVERSIGHT Annual Strategic Planning Meeting with Board and Executive Officers OTHER GOVERNANCE PRACTICES No Plurality Voting in Uncontested Director Elections No Staggered Board No Poison Pill No Supermajority Voting Requirements BOARD INDEPENDENCE AND STRUCTURE Majority Independent Directors Engaged Lead Director Frequent Executive Sessions for Independent Directors

2026 proxy, shareholder rights, board independence and governance practices; filed 2026-03-11 · Filed 11/03/2026

All incumbent directors during 2025 attended at least 75% of the total meetings of the Board and the committees on which they served occurring during the period in which they served.

2026 proxy, actual director attendance during 2025; filed 2026-03-11 · Filed 11/03/2026

MICHAEL O’GRADY, CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER:

Third-quarter 2026 earnings release, combined Chairman and Chief Executive Officer roles; filed 2026-10-21 · Filed 21/10/2026

Election of Directors All 13 nominees for director named in the proxy statement for the 2026 Annual Meeting were elected by the votes set forth in the table below.

April 2026 Form 8-K, completed election of all 13 director nominees; filed 2026-04-22 · Filed 22/04/2026

Publication history

Publication history
VersionUpdatedCompetitive advantage
1431/10/2026uncertain
1328/10/2026uncertain
1228/10/2026uncertain
1124/10/2026uncertain
1023/10/2026uncertain
922/10/2026uncertain
819/10/2026uncertain
719/10/2026uncertain
619/10/2026uncertain
518/10/2026uncertain

Sources

Research methodology and limitations · What is an economic moat?