Skip to content

Netflix

NASDAQ: NFLX · USD

Netflix (NFLX) Economic Moat Analysis50

Competitive advantages, dated evidence and erosion risks.

Narrow economic moat

Netflix has an evidenced scale advantage: more than 325 million paid memberships in 2025 support spreading largely fixed content commitments across a large paying audience. Q3 2026 subscription growth reflected increases in memberships and pricing, while management reported improved churn. These support pricing power and repeat demand, but do not establish customer lock-in or exceptional durability. Content requires continual reinvestment, entertainment substitutes remain abundant, and recent margin improvement partly reflected expense timing. The evidence supports a narrow moat, with limited comparative proof of competitors’ costs.

Cost advantage

Netflix’s large paying audience provides a structural opportunity to spread content costs across memberships because disclosed content payment terms do not depend on membership size or usage. Membership and pricing growth corroborate successful monetization of that scale; a quantified cost lead over named rivals is not established.

Durability
Multi-year content commitments and continued subscription growth support persistence. Maintaining the advantage requires repeatedly delivering attractive content and retaining a sufficiently large paying audience; the commitments themselves do not guarantee durable demand.
Competitors
Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Comcast, Disney, Meta, Roblox, TikTok
Erosion risks
Fixed commitments amplify downside if demand weakens. Consumers can change plans and maintain multiple entertainment relationships. Competition for discretionary time and content can raise reinvestment requirements. Q3 margin improvement partly reflected expense timing.
What would invalidate the thesis
Sustained membership losses or worsening churn following repricing, combined with content obligations that cannot adjust and recurring deterioration in cash generation, would undermine the scale advantage. Evidence that rivals achieve comparable content economics with materially smaller paying audiences would weaken the relative-cost claim.
Evidence (5) · Counterevidence (6)

Changes since the previous analysis

  • Retain the narrow moat verdict and scale-based cost mechanism; the 325 million membership figure remains explicitly a 2025 observation.
  • Raise retention from 2 to 3 because the current catalog adds management’s Q3 report of improved global and US churn, alongside quantified viewing evidence. Absolute churn and cohort data remain unavailable.
  • Update margin resilience for Q3 2026’s 34.6% operating margin, preserving the qualification that expense timing contributed to the improvement.
  • Replace the previous claim that named competitors were missing with the explicitly disclosed competitive set. Comparative rival economics remain unestablished.
  • Reassess governance using the implemented independent-chair appointment and disclosed voting outcome. Do not carry forward the previous analysis’s equal-voting, annual-election, special-meeting or rejected-resignation claims, which lack supporting passages in this catalog.
  • Update capital discipline for Q3 and nine-month repurchases; retain a mixed grade because cash returns exceed contemporaneous quarterly operating cash generation and year-to-date cash generation benefited from a termination fee.

Evidence limitations

  • Evidence consists of Netflix disclosures. Reported operating outcomes support ordinal assessments, but claims of superior positioning or healthy engagement do not independently prove exceptional durability.
  • Named rivals are established by Netflix’s competitive-set disclosure; their costs, retention, content returns and financial outcomes are not supplied.
  • Price and membership increases are identified as revenue drivers without isolating price contribution, plan mix or elasticity. Churn improvement is qualitative and issuer-reported, with no absolute rate or cohort series.
  • No demonstrated network effect, material customer switching cost or protected efficient-scale market is established. Intellectual property ownership alone does not establish a separate durable intangible-assets moat.
  • Complete subscription contracts, advertiser commitments and jurisdiction-specific repricing restrictions are absent. Executive ownership requirements do not demonstrate actual holdings or compliance.
  • Historical results are distinguished from forecasts. Source dates used here retain dateKind filed; no retrieval date is treated as publication evidence.

Financial indicators to test against the thesis

Calculated from annual filings. Missing data remains unavailable. Detailed financial charts remain in the other topics.

Financial indicators to test against the thesis
PeriodGross marginOperating marginROICFCF margin
202141.6%20.9%—-0.4%
202239.4%17.8%—5.1%
202341.5%20.6%20.9%20.5%
202446.1%26.7%30.1%17.7%
202548.5%29.5%35.6%20.9%

Pricing power69

  • Pricing outcomes

    Q3 2026 subscription revenue increased by $1,057 million, reflecting increases in memberships and pricing. Management also reported that member response to 2026 price changes matched prior adjustments and expectations. This supports realized pricing acceptance, although the disclosure does not isolate price contribution from membership growth or mix.

  • Customer demand

    Management reports improved year-over-year churn globally and in the US, with healthy retention in every region. More than 97 billion viewing hours in first-half 2026, up 2%, corroborate substantial repeat usage. This supports strong observed demand, while absolute churn, cohort retention and independent verification remain absent.

  • Margin resilience

    Operating margin reached 34.6% in Q3 2026 versus 28.2% a year earlier, following Q2’s decline to 33.4% from 34.1%. These outcomes demonstrate substantial resilience alongside subscription pricing growth. Expense timing contributed to Q3’s improvement, so the full increase cannot be attributed to pricing or treated as permanent.

  • Pricing freedom

    Realized price increases establish practical repricing discretion, and Netflix discloses that it may change and test country-level plan prices. That prospective statement alone does not establish unrestricted contractual freedom. Complete subscription terms, notice obligations and jurisdiction-specific constraints are missing; disclosed plan-selection effects also constrain economic discretion.

Management63

  • Capital discipline

    Cash generation and declining diluted shares show actual capital deployment and dilution control. However, Q3 repurchases of $4.8 billion exceeded approximately $3.2 billion of operating cash flow, outstanding notes were $15.1 billion, and first-quarter cash generation benefited from a $2.8 billion termination receipt. Repurchase value creation remains unproven.

  • Incentive alignment

    Implemented PSU/RSU compensation, certified bonus payments and actual performance-based vesting demonstrate alignment beyond proposed awards. Bonus metrics include non-GAAP revenue and operating margin; PSUs link compensation to relative shareholder returns. Clawbacks and ownership requirements add safeguards, but actual ownership compliance and exceptional incentive durability are not demonstrated.

  • Execution

    2025 membership, revenue and operating-income achievements continued into Q3 2026 subscription growth and operating margin expansion. Viewing and reported churn improvement support customer execution, with retention partly dependent on qualitative management reporting. Expense timing limits interpretation of the quarterly margin gain; the termination fee is excluded as recurring operating achievement.

  • Governance

    The implemented appointment of an independent chairman supports oversight, following disclosed responsibilities for independent-director coordination and executive sessions. The written-consent proposal was not approved, limiting evidence of expanded shareholder rights. These disclosures establish meaningful governance mechanisms, but provide insufficient evidence of exceptional oversight effectiveness or the complete shareholder-rights framework.

Sources and methodology

Current publication · Updated 23/10/2026 · Version 10

AI interpretation based on checked source excerpts. Issuer assertions and evidence limitations remain explicit.

Policy quality-scores-3: six equally weighted categories. The overall score requires full coverage. Missing inputs are not zero. Qualitative grades are sourced interpretations, not probabilities. 6/6 · 29/10/2026

Moat50

Equal-weight average of four evidence-backed rubric grades (0–4), scaled to 100.

structural advantage · 3/4 · More than 325 million paid memberships in 2025 provide substantial distribution over which to spread content payments that are independent of membership size and usage. Continued membership and pricing growth corroborate monetization. This establishes scale economics, although the catalog does not quantify Netflix’s unit-cost advantage over named competitors.

durability · 2/4 · Multi-year content commitments and continued subscription growth support persistence, but contracts secure spending rather than future customer demand. Consumers have many substitutes, and fixed obligations cannot readily adjust to weaker cash flow. The evidence supports a continuing advantage with material renewal requirements, without exceptional demonstrated durability.

customer dependency · 1/4 · Viewing volume and reported churn improvement demonstrate repeat demand, but limited dependency. Members can change plans and maintain simultaneous entertainment relationships, while Netflix competes for discretionary leisure time. No essential workflow, contractual lock-in or material switching friction is demonstrated; preference remains dependent on ongoing entertainment value.

erosion resilience · 2/4 · Q3 subscription growth, reported churn improvement and margin expansion show continued competitive resilience. However, Q2 margin compression demonstrates spending pressure, and Q3’s improvement partly reflected expense timing. These mixed outcomes support resilience with continuing reinvestment exposure, rather than either realized competitive collapse or exceptional protection from erosion.

Pricing power69

Equal-weight average of four evidence-backed rubric grades (0–4), scaled to 100.

realized pricing · 3/4 · Q3 2026 subscription revenue increased by $1,057 million, reflecting increases in memberships and pricing. Management also reported that member response to 2026 price changes matched prior adjustments and expectations. This supports realized pricing acceptance, although the disclosure does not isolate price contribution from membership growth or mix.

retention · 3/4 · Management reports improved year-over-year churn globally and in the US, with healthy retention in every region. More than 97 billion viewing hours in first-half 2026, up 2%, corroborate substantial repeat usage. This supports strong observed demand, while absolute churn, cohort retention and independent verification remain absent.

margin resilience · 3/4 · Operating margin reached 34.6% in Q3 2026 versus 28.2% a year earlier, following Q2’s decline to 33.4% from 34.1%. These outcomes demonstrate substantial resilience alongside subscription pricing growth. Expense timing contributed to Q3’s improvement, so the full increase cannot be attributed to pricing or treated as permanent.

contractual freedom · 2/4 · Realized price increases establish practical repricing discretion, and Netflix discloses that it may change and test country-level plan prices. That prospective statement alone does not establish unrestricted contractual freedom. Complete subscription terms, notice obligations and jurisdiction-specific constraints are missing; disclosed plan-selection effects also constrain economic discretion.

Predictability87

5 consecutive published annual periods. Equal weights: nondeclining revenue frequency; revenue-growth volatility (5–40pp); positive FCF frequency; FCF-margin volatility (3–20pp). Stability indicator, not a growth forecast.

Nondeclining revenue years (%)
100.00
Revenue growth volatility (pp)
4.60
Positive FCF years (%)
80.00
FCF margin volatility (pp)
8.77
observedAnnualPeriods
5.00

Financial strength80

Equal-weight grades: debt/FCF (1–8x), net debt/earnings before interest and tax (0–5x), interest service (1–12x), current ratio (0.75–2x). Earnings use reported operating income, an original issuer-reported unadjusted EBIT reconciled to net income, income tax and signed net interest, or reported pretax profit plus reported gross interest expense. Reported EBIT is distinct from GAAP operating income and gross interest. Interest service uses earnings/interest expense; if unavailable, it uses reported operating cash flow/cash interest paid, without relabeling cash paid as accrued expense. Nonpositive cash flow/earnings score 0 for their service component; reported zero interest with a positive numerator scores 100. Net cash scores 100 for net leverage. Missing disclosures remain unavailable. General nonfinancial-company rubric, not a credit rating; exceptional and nonoperating gains are not normalized out. IFRS finance-cost and cash-flow classifications retain their reported scope.

debtFcfGrade
92.45
netDebtEbitGrade
91.85
interestCoverageGrade
100.00
currentRatioGrade
34.86
Debt / FCF (x)
1.53
Net debt / operating income (x)
0.41
Interest coverage (x)
17.16
Current ratio (x)
1.19

Capital allocation98

Three-year equal-weight indicators: pretax return on average invested capital (0–25%; equity + debt − cash, each year and its prior year), share-count growth (0–5%, lower better), share-based cost/revenue (2–20%, lower better), consolidated FCF/net income (0–1x). Return uses reported operating income, an original issuer-reported unadjusted EBIT reconciled to net income, income tax and signed net interest, or EBIT calculated from reported pretax profit plus reported gross interest expense; the issuer-reported EBIT is distinct from GAAP operating income and gross interest; exceptional/nonoperating gains are not normalized out. Share-based cost uses the reported cash-flow add-back or, if absent, separately reported recognized compensation expense; the latter never becomes an FCF adjustment. Nonpositive net income scores 0 for cash conversion; absent income/FCF stays unavailable. ROIC remains undefined for nonpositive invested capital; the explicit asset-return alternative does not change the ROIC chart. Missing financial inputs alone never trigger an alternative. Does not establish acquisition quality or buyback timing.

3-year pre-tax operating return (%)
33.23
3-year average dilution (%)
-1.50
3-year average SBC / revenue (%)
0.84
cashConversionGrade
92.86

Management63

Equal-weight average of four evidence-backed rubric grades (0–4), scaled to 100.

capital discipline · 2/4 · Cash generation and declining diluted shares show actual capital deployment and dilution control. However, Q3 repurchases of $4.8 billion exceeded approximately $3.2 billion of operating cash flow, outstanding notes were $15.1 billion, and first-quarter cash generation benefited from a $2.8 billion termination receipt. Repurchase value creation remains unproven.

incentive alignment · 3/4 · Implemented PSU/RSU compensation, certified bonus payments and actual performance-based vesting demonstrate alignment beyond proposed awards. Bonus metrics include non-GAAP revenue and operating margin; PSUs link compensation to relative shareholder returns. Clawbacks and ownership requirements add safeguards, but actual ownership compliance and exceptional incentive durability are not demonstrated.

execution · 3/4 · 2025 membership, revenue and operating-income achievements continued into Q3 2026 subscription growth and operating margin expansion. Viewing and reported churn improvement support customer execution, with retention partly dependent on qualitative management reporting. Expense timing limits interpretation of the quarterly margin gain; the termination fee is excluded as recurring operating achievement.

governance · 2/4 · The implemented appointment of an independent chairman supports oversight, following disclosed responsibilities for independent-director coordination and executive sessions. The written-consent proposal was not approved, limiting evidence of expanded shareholder rights. These disclosures establish meaningful governance mechanisms, but provide insufficient evidence of exceptional oversight effectiveness or the complete shareholder-rights framework.

Evidence

In 2025, we surpassed 325 million paid memberships, achieved approximately $45.2 billion in revenue, representing approximately 16% year-over-year growth, and over $13.3 billion of operating income, as well as increased our net cash provided by operating activities to over $10.1 billion.

2026 proxy, filed 2026-04-16: Netflix 2025 operating highlights · Filed 16/04/2026

The payment terms of these agreements are not tied to member usage or the size of our membership base (“fixed cost”) but may be determined by costs of production or tied to such factors as titles licensed and/or theatrical exhibition receipts.

2025 Form 10-K, filed 2026-01-23: content payment terms and fixed-cost definition · Filed 23/01/2026

In connection with licensing streaming content, we typically enter into multi-year commitments with studios and other content providers.

2025 Form 10-K, filed 2026-01-23: multi-year licensed-content commitments · Filed 23/01/2026

Given the multiple-year duration and largely fixed cost nature of content commitments, if business performance does not meet our expectations, our margins may be adversely impacted.

2025 Form 10-K, filed 2026-01-23: fixed content commitments and margin downside · Filed 23/01/2026

We compete with a broad set of activities for consumers’ leisure time, including other entertainment video providers, such as linear television, streaming entertainment providers (including those that provide pirated content), video gaming providers, open content platform providers, which provide access to user-generated and professionally produced content, as well as more broadly against other sources of entertainment, such as social media, that our members could choose in their moments of free time.

2025 Form 10-K, filed 2026-01-23: competition for consumers’ leisure time · Filed 23/01/2026

Members can play, pause and resume watching as much as they want, anytime, anywhere, and can change their plans at any time.

2025 Form 10-K, filed 2026-01-23: members’ ability to change plans · Filed 23/01/2026

Q3’25 (in thousands, except percentages) Revenues $ 12,874,176 $ 11,510,307 $ 1,363,869 12 % Revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2026 increased 12% as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2025, primarily due to the growth in subscription revenue of $1,057 million, which reflects increases in memberships and pricing, and an increase of $256 million in advertising revenue.

Q3 2026 Form 10-Q, filed 2026-10-21: subscription and advertising revenue growth drivers · Filed 21/10/2026

Membership growth benefited from continued, healthy retention in every region; globally and in the US, churn improved year-over-year and was better than forecast.

Q3 2026 shareholder letter, filed 2026-10-20: management report of regional retention and improved churn · Filed 20/10/2026

Quantity of engagement is also important and, as detailed in our bi-annual What We Watched5 report, in the first half of 2026, our members watched more than 97 billion hours, up 2% year over year.

Q2 2026 shareholder letter, filed 2026-07-16: first-half 2026 viewing hours and year-over-year growth · Filed 16/07/2026

Operating margin was 34.6%, up from 28.2% in Q3’25 and ahead of our forecast primarily due to the timing of expenses.

Q3 2026 shareholder letter, filed 2026-10-20: realized operating margin and expense-timing qualification · Filed 20/10/2026

Both Q3 operating income and margin were ahead of forecast due primarily to the timing of expenses and the slight upside in revenue.

Q3 2026 shareholder letter, filed 2026-10-20: reasons operating income and margin exceeded forecast · Filed 20/10/2026

Q2’25 (in thousands, except percentages) Financial Results: Revenues $ 12,559,938 $ 11,079,166 $ 1,480,772 13 % Constant currency change in revenues(1) 12 % Operating income $ 4,192,610 $ 3,774,694 $ 417,916 11 % Operating margin 33.4 % 34.1 % (0.7) % Net income $ 3,401,414 $ 3,125,413 $ 276,001 9 % (1) See the “Non-GAAP Constant Currency Information” section below for additional details on our use of constant currency revenue.

Q2 2026 Form 10-Q, filed 2026-07-17: quarterly revenue, operating income and margin comparison · Filed 17/07/2026

(in millions except per share data) Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26 Q3'26 Q4'26 Forecast Revenue $ 11,510 $ 12,051 $ 12,250 $ 12,560 $ 12,874 $ 13,442 Y/Y % Growth 17.2 % 17.6 % 16.2 % 13.4 % 11.8 % 11.5 % Operating Income $ 3,248 $ 2,957 $ 3,957 $ 4,193 $ 4,459 $ 3,500 Operating Margin 28.2 % 24.5 % 32.3 % 33.4 % 34.6 % 26.0 % Net Income $ 2,547 $ 2,419 $ 5,283 $ 3,401 $ 3,664 $ 2,787 Diluted EPS $ 0.59 $ 0.56 $ 1.23 $ 0.80 $ 0.87 $ 0.67 Net cash provided by operating activities $ 2,825 $ 2,112 $ 5,290 $ 1,744 $ 3,162 Free Cash Flow $ 2,660 $ 1,872 $ 5,094 $ 1,525 $ 2,884 Shares (FD) 4,340 4,317 4,298 4,261 4,195 __________________________________ 1 Excluding the year over year effect of foreign exchange rate movements and the impact of hedging gains/losses realized as revenues.

Q3 2026 shareholder letter, filed 2026-10-20: historical quarterly results through Q3 2026 and separately labelled Q4 forecast · Filed 20/10/2026

Concurrently with the termination of the Amended and Restated Merger Agreement and entry into such agreement between WBD and PSKY, PSKY, on behalf of WBD, paid a $2.8 billion termination fee owed to Netflix in accordance with the terms of the Amended and Restated Merger Agreement.

Q3 2026 Form 10-Q, filed 2026-10-21: receipt of WBD transaction termination fee · Filed 21/10/2026

This increase was driven in part by a $2.8B cash receipt from the Warner Bros.-related termination fee.

Q1 2026 shareholder letter, filed 2026-04-16: termination fee contribution to operating cash flow · Filed 16/04/2026

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026, the Company repurchased 63,917,979 and 130,349,765 shares of common stock, respectively, for an aggregate amount of $4.8 billion and $10.7 billion, respectively (excluding the 1% excise tax on stock repurchases as a result of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022).

Q3 2026 Form 10-Q, filed 2026-10-21: actual quarterly and nine-month share repurchases · Filed 21/10/2026

13 Table of Contents 7. Debt As of September 30, 2026, the Company had aggregate outstanding notes of $15,132 million, net of $59 million of issuance costs and discounts and $145 million of fair value hedging adjustments, with varying maturities (the “Notes”).

Q3 2026 Form 10-Q, filed 2026-10-21: outstanding notes at September 30, 2026 · Filed 21/10/2026

In addition, the Company achieved a relative total shareholder return (compared to constituents of the S&P 500) at the 92nd percentile for the two-year performance period applicable to the second tranche of performance-based restricted stock unit (“PSU”) awards granted in 2024, leading such tranche to vest at 200% of target.

2026 proxy, filed 2026-04-16: realized performance-based vesting of 2024 PSU second tranche · Filed 16/04/2026

We transitioned to the use of an equal mix of PSU awards and RSU awards for 2024 Named Executive Officer compensation to incorporate longer vesting periods and specific performance criteria in our equity awards.

2026 proxy, filed 2026-04-16: implemented transition to PSU and RSU compensation in 2024 · Filed 16/04/2026

We continued this use of an equal mix of PSU awards and RSU awards in 2025.

2026 proxy, filed 2026-04-16: continued equal PSU and RSU mix in 2025 · Filed 16/04/2026

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, the following represent the most important financial performance measures used by us to link compensation actually paid to our Named Executive Officers for fiscal year 2025 to company performance: F/X Neutral Operating Margin (1) F/X Neutral Revenue (1) Company TSR relative to the TSR of the companies in the S&P 500 (2) (1) We used F/X Neutral Operating Margin and F/X Neutral Revenue as financial performance measures to link CAP to company performance, as these were the metrics used in the 2025 Performance Bonus Program.

2026 proxy, filed 2026-04-16: actual 2025 compensation performance measures · Filed 16/04/2026

Both of these measures are non-GAAP financial measures.

2026 proxy, filed 2026-04-16: non-GAAP qualification of bonus financial measures · Filed 16/04/2026

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | NETFLIX 2026 PROXY STATEMENT Table of Contents 44 Amounts earned were paid in 2026 following the completion of the 2025 performance period and the Compensation Committee’s certification of the 2025 Bonus Program’s results.

2026 proxy, filed 2026-04-16: payment and certification of 2025 bonus results · Filed 16/04/2026

The Company has also adopted a compensation clawback policy to comply with Exchange Act Rule 10D-1 and the Nasdaq listing standards regarding recovery of erroneously awarded compensation in the event of an accounting restatement.

2026 proxy, filed 2026-04-16: adopted compensation clawback policy · Filed 16/04/2026

The guidelines require that, within five years of adoption or, for future executive officers, within five years of first becoming a Netflix Rule 3b-7 executive officer, each executive officer own at least a number of shares equal to a multiple of the executive officer’s base salary: 6x base salary for the co-CEOs and 3x base salary for the other executive officers.

2026 proxy, filed 2026-04-16: executive stock ownership requirements and compliance period · Filed 16/04/2026

On May 29, 2026, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Company appointed Jay Hoag to serve as the Chairman of the Board, effective as of the conclusion of the Annual Meeting.

Form 8-K, filed 2026-06-05: appointment of Jay Hoag as chairman effective after the annual meeting · Filed 05/06/2026

Hoag is an independent director under the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market.

Form 8-K, filed 2026-06-05: Jay Hoag’s disclosed independence · Filed 05/06/2026

As lead independent director, Mr. Hoag’s responsibilities include: • coordinating the activities of the independent directors, and authorization to call meetings of the independent directors; • coordinating with the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer(s) and Corporate Secretary, as appropriate, in helping set the agenda for Board meetings, including suggestions from other members of the Board; • chairing executive sessions of the independent directors; • providing feedback and perspective to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer(s) about discussions among the independent directors; • helping facilitate communication among the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer(s) and the independent directors; • presiding at Board meetings where the Chairman is not present; and • performing other duties assigned from time to time by the Board.

2026 proxy, filed 2026-04-16: then-current lead independent director responsibilities · Filed 16/04/2026

The non-binding stockholder proposal entitled, “Proposal 4 - Shareholder Right to Act by Written Consent” was not approved.

Form 8-K, filed 2026-06-05: unsuccessful non-binding written-consent proposal · Filed 05/06/2026

We expect that from time to time the prices of our streaming plans in each country may change and we may test other plan and price variations.

Q3 2026 Form 10-Q, filed 2026-10-21: anticipated discretion to change and test plan prices · Filed 21/10/2026

The prices of our streaming plans, and periodic changes to these prices, may impact growth in memberships and the plans that both new and existing members choose, including the number of members that select our ad-supported subscription.

Q3 2026 Form 10-Q, filed 2026-10-21: pricing effects on membership growth and plan selection · Filed 21/10/2026

Today, our competitive set includes Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Comcast, Disney, local media companies around the world, Meta, Roblox, and TikTok, to name a few.

Q1 2026 shareholder letter, filed 2026-04-16: explicitly named competitive set · Filed 16/04/2026

The decrease in operating margin was primarily driven by technology and development expenses and sales and marketing expenses growing at a faster rate than revenue.

Q2 2026 Form 10-Q, filed 2026-07-17: expense growth behind quarterly margin compression · Filed 17/07/2026

•Member response to our 2026 price changes is consistent with prior adjustments and our expectations, an indicator that our engagement - which encompasses quantity, quality and variety of viewing - remains healthy and that we continue to deliver strong value to members.

Q3 2026 shareholder letter, filed 2026-10-20: management characterization of member response to 2026 price changes · Filed 20/10/2026

While consumers may maintain simultaneous relationships with multiple entertainment sources, we strive for consumers to choose us in their moments of free time.

2025 Form 10-K, filed 2026-01-23: simultaneous consumer relationships with entertainment sources · Filed 23/01/2026

Further, we may be unable to react to any reduction in our cash flows from operations, including those caused by a downturn in the economy, by reducing our streaming content obligations in the near-term.

2025 Form 10-K, filed 2026-01-23: limited near-term flexibility to reduce content obligations · Filed 23/01/2026

Publication history

Publication history
VersionUpdatedCompetitive advantage
1029/10/2026narrow
927/10/2026narrow
824/10/2026narrow
723/10/2026narrow
622/10/2026narrow
519/10/2026narrow
418/10/2026narrow
318/10/2026narrow
218/10/2026narrow
118/10/2026Unavailable

Sources

Research methodology and limitations · What is an economic moat?