Skip to content

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies

NYSE: WAB · USD

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies (WAB) Economic Moat Analysis63

Competitive advantages, dated evidence and erosion risks.

Narrow economic moat

Wabtec has a narrow moat from its installed base, original-supplier preference for safety-critical replacements and upgrades, and long-term service relationships. Reported aftermarket growth and multi-year orders support a current advantage, although switching costs and customer retention are not quantified. Pricing escalations and surcharges show some pricing capability, but realized net pricing is undisclosed and strong price competition limits confidence. Productivity and acquisitions explain margin improvements; margins alone do not establish the moat.

Switching costs

The installed base of nearly 24,600 locomotives creates an aftermarket advantage: customers favor original suppliers for safety- and performance-related parts and upgrades. Existing long-term service agreements, growing Transit aftermarket demand and new multi-year orders corroborate continuing customer demand. Customer-specific engineering reinforces relationships, although contractual protection for completed work does not itself prove customer lock-in.

Durability
The installed base and service agreements support persistence over multiple years. Backlog reached $30.9 billion in June 2026, but includes acquisitions and cancellable orders. The passages support a narrow advantage without demonstrating exceptional durability or exclusive aftermarket access.
Competitors
New York Air Brake Company, Knorr-Bremse AG, Amsted Rail Company, Inc., Progress Rail, CRRC Corporation Limited
Erosion risks
Customers can perform service internally or use competing suppliers. Historical disclosures describe strong price competition. Freight organic Services sales declined in the first half of 2026, demonstrating that installed-base demand can fluctuate. Counterfeiting and technological change could weaken differentiation; these risks do not establish that the overall advantage has already eroded.
What would invalidate the thesis
The thesis would weaken materially if customers repeatedly shifted replacement parts and service work to competitors or in-house operations, if aftermarket demand persistently underperformed fleet activity because original-supplier preference weakened, or if service renewals and modernization orders declined alongside sustained concessions. Persistent failure to recover costs through pricing or productivity would further challenge the advantage.
Evidence (7) · Counterevidence (8)

Changes since the previous analysis

  • Retain the previous narrow verdict; installed-base scale, existing service agreements and new multi-year orders provide additional support.
  • Refine pricing power from wholly unproven to mixed: disclosed implementation of escalations and surcharges demonstrates capability, but net realization and full cost recovery remain unquantified.
  • Add contrary operating evidence: first-half 2026 Freight organic Services sales declined despite overall growth and Transit aftermarket strength.
  • Assess management using disclosed incentive arrangements, actual vesting, governance practices and capital deployment rather than reputation.
  • Treat the Progress Rail litigation as settled in February 2026 without admission of liability or operating-results impact; earlier allegations do not prove monopoly power.

Evidence limitations

  • All evidence comes from issuer filings. Original-supplier preference and competitive-strength descriptions are management assertions, partly corroborated by operating results and contractual disclosures.
  • Named competitors are disclosed, but product-level market shares, relative pricing, win rates and comparative service economics are absent. International local suppliers and customer in-house operations are incompletely identified.
  • No customer retention rate, switching-cost amount, aftermarket exclusivity or renewal cohort is disclosed. Repeat demand and customer dependency are assessed indirectly.
  • Implemented pricing actions are disclosed without quantified realized net pricing, surcharge collections or price-versus-cost recovery. Margin improvement cannot be attributed to pricing alone.
  • Backlog includes acquired business and cancellable contracts; its growth is not a pure measure of organic retention. Accounting useful lives do not establish economic moat duration.
  • The proxy supplies actual compensation structures and governance practices, but the supplied passages omit comprehensive executive ownership holdings and detailed incentive thresholds. Expected vesting is not completed vesting.
  • All supplied source dates have dateKind filed. The latest supplied filing is dated July 22, 2026 and reports through June 30, 2026; subsequent developments are outside coverage.
  • The evidence does not establish separate network effects, efficient scale, a relative cost advantage or an independently durable patent moat.

Financial indicators to test against the thesis

Calculated from annual filings. Missing data remains unavailable. Detailed financial charts remain in the other topics.

Financial indicators to test against the thesis
PeriodGross marginOperating marginROICFCF margin
202130.3%11.2%4.9%12.1%
202230.4%12.1%—10.6%
202330.4%13.1%—10.5%
202432.4%15.5%—15.7%
202534.1%16.1%—13.4%

Pricing power56

  • Pricing outcomes

    The issuer reports implementing price escalations and surcharges, providing evidence of actual pricing actions. Historical strong price competition and continuing tariff costs constrain the assessment. Net realized pricing and the recovery achieved are not quantified.

  • Customer demand

    Original-supplier preference, existing service agreements, Transit aftermarket growth and multi-year orders support repeat demand indirectly. Declining Freight organic Services sales and customer in-house alternatives make the evidence mixed; no retention rate is inferred.

  • Margin resilience

    Reported 2026 gross profit and operating income increased, and gross-margin improvement continued despite tariff inflation. Disclosed drivers include productivity, restructuring and acquisition accretion, following similar operational improvements in 2025. This supports operating resilience, while leaving pricing's contribution unresolved.

  • Pricing freedom

    Contract escalation clauses and implemented surcharges provide some ability to adjust terms. Prices remain specified by contract, alongside discounts, damages and performance conditions; unilateral repricing or comprehensive inflation protection is not established.

Management63

  • Capital discipline

    First-half operating cash generation rose to $640 million, but $1.062 billion of acquisition spending and $108 million of capital expenditure coincided with $457 million of repurchases, $106 million of dividends and $1.049 billion of net debt inflows. Higher acquisition-related interest expense and unproven acquisition returns make discipline mixed.

  • Incentive alignment

    Disclosed 2025 compensation links performance units to three-year ROIC and operating cash flow with a relative shareholder-return modifier. Actual grants and vesting corroborate an operating equity program, supported by ownership and anti-hedging policies. Comprehensive holdings and target difficulty are missing, limiting claims of exceptional alignment.

  • Execution

    Reported profit and cash generation improved alongside Transit organic growth and higher backlog. Productivity and restructuring benefits provide operating corroboration beyond management process claims. Execution is assessed partly from aggregate results, which include acquisitions and coexist with Freight Services weakness.

  • Governance

    Independent committees, shareholder rights, meeting attendance and actual audit-service pre-approval support functioning oversight. Classified director terms and the subsequently disclosed combined Chairman/CEO role temper the assessment. Policies alone do not establish exceptional oversight effectiveness.

Sources and methodology

Current publication · Updated 18/10/2026 · Version 6

AI interpretation based on checked source excerpts. Issuer assertions and evidence limitations remain explicit.

Policy quality-scores-2: six equally weighted categories. The overall score requires full coverage. Missing inputs are not zero. Qualitative grades are sourced interpretations, not probabilities. 4/6 · 19/10/2026

Moat63

Equal-weight average of four evidence-backed rubric grades (0–4), scaled to 100.

structural advantage · 3/4 · A large installed base, original-supplier preference and existing long-term service agreements establish a meaningful aftermarket position. Actual Transit aftermarket growth corroborates the mechanism, although its strength varies by business.

durability · 2/4 · Service agreements and new multi-year orders support persistence. Cancellation rights and credible competing service providers limit confidence in long-duration protection; no exceptional durability is demonstrated.

customer dependency · 3/4 · Safety-related replacement demand, customer-specific engineering and long-term services demonstrate substantial embedded relationships. Dependency is inferred from these disclosures rather than measured switching costs; customers retain alternative suppliers and in-house capabilities.

erosion resilience · 2/4 · Transit aftermarket growth and additional orders support continued relevance. Freight Services declines, strong historical price competition and encountered counterfeits demonstrate limits to resilience without establishing broad competitive deterioration.

Pricing power56

Equal-weight average of four evidence-backed rubric grades (0–4), scaled to 100.

realized pricing · 2/4 · The issuer reports implementing price escalations and surcharges, providing evidence of actual pricing actions. Historical strong price competition and continuing tariff costs constrain the assessment. Net realized pricing and the recovery achieved are not quantified.

retention · 2/4 · Original-supplier preference, existing service agreements, Transit aftermarket growth and multi-year orders support repeat demand indirectly. Declining Freight organic Services sales and customer in-house alternatives make the evidence mixed; no retention rate is inferred.

margin resilience · 3/4 · Reported 2026 gross profit and operating income increased, and gross-margin improvement continued despite tariff inflation. Disclosed drivers include productivity, restructuring and acquisition accretion, following similar operational improvements in 2025. This supports operating resilience, while leaving pricing's contribution unresolved.

contractual freedom · 2/4 · Contract escalation clauses and implemented surcharges provide some ability to adjust terms. Prices remain specified by contract, alongside discounts, damages and performance conditions; unilateral repricing or comprehensive inflation protection is not established.

Predictability100

Five consecutive annual periods. Equal weights: nondeclining revenue frequency; revenue-growth volatility (5–40pp); positive FCF frequency; FCF-margin volatility (3–20pp). Stability indicator, not a growth forecast.

Nondeclining revenue years (%)
100.00
Revenue growth volatility (pp)
3.68
Positive FCF years (%)
100.00
FCF margin volatility (pp)
1.93

Financial strength—

Missing required inputs: netDebtEbitGrade. Equal-weight grades: debt/FCF (1–8x), net debt/earnings before interest and tax (0–5x), interest service (1–12x), current ratio (0.75–2x). Earnings use reported operating income, or reported pretax profit plus reported interest expense when operating income is unavailable. Interest service uses earnings/interest expense; if unavailable, it uses reported operating cash flow/cash interest paid, without relabeling cash paid as accrued expense. Nonpositive cash flow/earnings score 0 for their service component; reported zero interest with a positive numerator scores 100. Net cash scores 100 for net leverage. Missing disclosures remain unavailable. General nonfinancial-company rubric, not a credit rating; exceptional and nonoperating gains are not normalized out. IFRS finance-cost and cash-flow classifications retain their reported scope.

debtFcfGrade
61.48
interestCoverageGrade
63.35
currentRatioGrade
28.45
Debt / FCF (x)
3.70
Interest coverage (x)
7.97
Current ratio (x)
1.11

Capital allocation—

Missing required inputs: operatingReturn. Three-year equal-weight indicators: pretax return on average invested capital (0–25%; equity + debt − cash, each year and its prior year), share-count growth (0–5%, lower better), share-based cost/revenue (2–20%, lower better), consolidated FCF/net income (0–1x). Return uses reported operating income or, if unavailable, EBIT calculated from reported pretax profit plus reported interest expense; exceptional/nonoperating gains are not normalized out. Share-based cost uses the reported cash-flow add-back or, if absent, separately reported recognized compensation expense; the latter never becomes an FCF adjustment. Nonpositive net income scores 0 for cash conversion; absent income/FCF stays unavailable. Nonpositive invested capital has no defined return and remains unavailable. Does not establish acquisition quality or buyback timing.

3-year average dilution (%)
-2.19
3-year average SBC / revenue (%)
0.61
cashConversionGrade
100.00

Management63

Equal-weight average of four evidence-backed rubric grades (0–4), scaled to 100.

capital discipline · 2/4 · First-half operating cash generation rose to $640 million, but $1.062 billion of acquisition spending and $108 million of capital expenditure coincided with $457 million of repurchases, $106 million of dividends and $1.049 billion of net debt inflows. Higher acquisition-related interest expense and unproven acquisition returns make discipline mixed.

incentive alignment · 3/4 · Disclosed 2025 compensation links performance units to three-year ROIC and operating cash flow with a relative shareholder-return modifier. Actual grants and vesting corroborate an operating equity program, supported by ownership and anti-hedging policies. Comprehensive holdings and target difficulty are missing, limiting claims of exceptional alignment.

execution · 3/4 · Reported profit and cash generation improved alongside Transit organic growth and higher backlog. Productivity and restructuring benefits provide operating corroboration beyond management process claims. Execution is assessed partly from aggregate results, which include acquisitions and coexist with Freight Services weakness.

governance · 2/4 · Independent committees, shareholder rights, meeting attendance and actual audit-service pre-approval support functioning oversight. Classified director terms and the subsequently disclosed combined Chairman/CEO role temper the assessment. Policies alone do not establish exceptional oversight effectiveness.

Evidence

Our substantial installed base of products with end-users, such as the railroads and the passenger transit authorities, is a significant competitive advantage for providing products and services to the aftermarket because these customers often look to purchase safety- and performance-related replacement parts and technology upgrades from the original equipment components supplier.

Business / Competitive Strengths / original-supplier aftermarket preference · Filed 13/02/2026

Wabtec has an installed base of nearly 24,600 locomotives, as well as a diverse offering of Transit locomotives and cars both internationally and domestically.

Business / installed locomotive base · Filed 13/02/2026

The backlog intangible asset primarily consists of in-place long-term service agreements acquired by the Company in conjunction with the acquisition of GE Transportation.

Notes / intangible assets / existing long-term service agreements · Filed 13/02/2026

33 Transit Segment The following table shows our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for our Transit Segment for the periods indicated: Three Months Ended June 30, In millions 2026 2025 Change % Change Net sales $ 936 $ 787 $ 149 18.9 % Cost of sales (629) (546) 83 15.2 % Cost of sales (% of Net sales) 67.2 % 69.3 % (2.1) Gross profit 307 241 66 27.4 % Operating expenses (161) (132) 29 22.0 % Income from operations $ 146 $ 109 $ 37 33.9 % Income from operations (% of Net sales) 15.6 % 13.9 % 1.7 The following table shows the major components of the change in Net sales for the Transit Segment in the second quarter of 2026 from the second quarter of 2025: In millions Second Quarter 2025 Net sales $ 787 Acquisitions 69 Portfolio Optimization (Divestitures/Exits) (1) Foreign Exchange 10 Organic changes in Net sales by Product Line: Aftermarket 56 Original Equipment Manufacturing 15 Second Quarter 2026 Net sales $ 936 Net sales Transit Segment organic sales increased by $71 million, or 9.0%, driven by strong Aftermarket and Original Equipment Manufacturing sales primarily as a result of increased demand for products and services due to fleet expansion and renewals, increased passenger ridership levels and increased investments in sustainable infrastructure.

MD&A / second-quarter Transit results and organic aftermarket growth · Filed 22/07/2026

Total multi-year backlog increased $3.5 billion during the first six months of 2026 to a record $30.9 billion at June 30, 2026.

MD&A / first-half 2026 backlog growth · Filed 22/07/2026

Significant Freight orders included a multi-year, multi-billion-dollar mining contract for drive systems and aftermarket parts, a $1.0 billion Australian order spanning across new locomotives, components, digital solutions, and multi-year services, a $210 million U.S.

MD&A / significant multi-year Freight orders · Filed 22/07/2026

The Company also has long-term customer agreements involving the design and production of highly engineered products that require revenue to be recognized over time because these products have no alternative use without significant economic loss, and the agreements contain an enforceable right to payment including a reasonable profit margin from the customer in the event of contract termination.

Revenue recognition / customer-specific engineering and termination payment rights · Filed 22/07/2026

Within North America, New York Air Brake Company, a subsidiary of the German air brake producer Knorr-Bremse AG (“Knorr”) and Amsted Rail Company, Inc., a subsidiary of Amsted Industries Corporation, are our principal overall OEM competitors.

Business / named North American OEM competitors · Filed 13/02/2026

Our primary competition for locomotives is Progress Rail, owned by a subsidiary of Caterpillar.

Business / named locomotive competitor · Filed 13/02/2026

Our primary competition for freight and passenger transit service and repair is mostly from the railroads’ and passenger transit authorities’ in-house operations and Knorr.

Business / service competition from customers and Knorr · Filed 13/02/2026

Depending on the product line and geography, we can also compete with our customers, such as CRRC Corporation Limited, a China-based manufacturer of rolling stock.

Business / competition from rolling-stock customers · Filed 13/02/2026

Price competition is strong because we have a relatively small number of customers and they are very cost-conscious.

Business / strong price competition and cost-conscious customers · Filed 12/02/2025

36 Freight Segment The following table shows our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for our Freight Segment for the periods indicated: Six Months Ended June 30, In millions 2026 2025 Change % Change Net sales: Sales of goods $ 3,432 $ 2,890 $ 542 18.8 % Sales of services 926 930 (4) (0.4) % Total Net sales 4,358 3,820 538 14.1 % Cost of sales: Cost of goods (2,137) (1,893) 244 12.9 % Cost of services (579) (545) 34 6.2 % Total Cost of sales (2,716) (2,438) 278 11.4 % Cost of sales (% of Net sales) 62.3 % 63.8 % (1.5) Gross profit 1,642 1,382 260 18.8 % Operating expenses (688) (547) 141 25.8 % Income from operations $ 954 $ 835 $ 119 14.3 % Income from operations (% of Net sales) 21.9 % 21.9 % 0.0 The following table shows the major components of the change in Net sales for the Freight Segment in the first six months of 2026 from the first six months of 2025: In millions First Six Months of 2025 Net sales $ 3,820 Acquisitions 347 Portfolio Optimization (Divestitures/Exits) (21) Foreign Exchange 34 Organic changes in Net sales by Product Line: Equipment 434 Services (192) Components (18) Digital Intelligence (46) First Six Months of 2026 Net sales $ 4,358 Net sales Freight Segment organic sales increased by $178 million, or 4.7%, driven primarily by Equipment sales from higher North American and international locomotive deliveries and higher mining sales.

MD&A / first-half Freight organic sales bridge and Services decline · Filed 22/07/2026

The Company’s contracts are subject to standard industry cancellation provisions, including cancellations on short notice or upon completion of designated stages.

Business / backlog cancellation provisions · Filed 13/02/2026

Further, although we routinely conduct anti-counterfeiting activities in multiple jurisdictions, we have encountered counterfeit reproductions of our products or products that otherwise infringe on our intellectual property rights.

Risk Factors / encountered counterfeit products · Filed 13/02/2026

These actions include implementing price escalations and surcharges, driving operational efficiencies through various cost mitigation efforts and discretionary spend management, strategically sourcing materials, reviewing and modifying distribution logistics, and accelerating integration synergies through our strategic initiatives.

MD&A / implemented price escalations, surcharges and other mitigation actions · Filed 22/07/2026

The Company has experienced increased tariff costs which unfavorably impacted our operating results and cash from operations for the six months ended June 30, 2026.

MD&A / realized tariff effects on results and operating cash flow · Filed 22/07/2026

Pricing is defined in our contracts on a line item basis and includes an estimate of variable consideration when required by the terms of the individual customer contract.

Revenue recognition / contractually specified line-item pricing · Filed 22/07/2026

Types of variable consideration the Company typically has include volume discounts, prompt payment discounts, price escalation clauses, liquidating damages, and performance bonuses.

Revenue recognition / escalation clauses, discounts, damages and bonuses · Filed 22/07/2026

3 WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME Unaudited Unaudited Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, In millions, except per share data 2026 2025 2026 2025 Net sales: Sales of goods $ 2,670 $ 2,226 $ 5,201 $ 4,383 Sales of services 509 480 928 933 Total net sales 3,179 2,706 6,129 5,316 Cost of sales: Cost of goods (1,710) (1,481) (3,326) (2,931) Cost of services (308) (287) (581) (547) Total cost of sales (2,018) (1,768) (3,907) (3,478) Gross profit 1,161 938 2,222 1,838 Operating expenses: Selling, general and administrative expenses (400) (347) (801) (654) Engineering expenses (70) (50) (126) (96) Amortization expense (91) (69) (178) (142) Total operating expenses (561) (466) (1,105) (892) Income from operations 600 472 1,117 946 Other income and expenses: Interest expense, net (80) (46) (151) (92) Other (expense) income, net (2) 24 21 22 Income before income taxes 518 450 987 876 Income tax expense (122) (111) (228) (210) Net income 396 339 759 666 Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest (1) (3) (2) (8) Net income attributable to Wabtec shareholders $ 395 $ 336 $ 757 $ 658 Earnings Per Common Share Basic Net income attributable to Wabtec shareholders $ 2.33 $ 1.96 $ 4.45 $ 3.84 Diluted Net income attributable to Wabtec shareholders $ 2.33 $ 1.96 $ 4.44 $ 3.84 Weighted average shares outstanding Basic 169.1 170.6 169.5 170.6 Diluted 169.6 171.2 170.1 171.2 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

Unaudited consolidated income statements / 2026 and comparative 2025 results · Filed 22/07/2026

The improvement in gross margin is attributable to productivity and efficiency, savings from restructuring initiatives, and accretion from recent acquisitions, partially offset by inflation driven by tariffs and unfavorable mix within the Freight Segment.

MD&A / gross-margin improvement attribution and tariff pressure · Filed 22/07/2026

The improvement in gross margin is attributable to strong productivity and cost management, savings from restructuring initiatives, and the exit of low margin business offerings through Portfolio Optimization.

MD&A / 2025 gross-margin improvement attribution · Filed 13/02/2026

Operating activities In the first six months of 2026, cash provided by operating activities was $640 million compared to $400 million in the first six months of 2025.

Liquidity / first-half operating cash generation · Filed 22/07/2026

During the first six months of 2026, Wabtec used $1,062 million for acquisitions, primarily for Dellner Couplers and $108 million for additions to property, plant and equipment for investments in our facilities and manufacturing processes.

Liquidity / actual acquisition and capital spending · Filed 22/07/2026

Financing activities In the first six months of 2026, cash provided by financing activities was $408 million, which included $1,049 million of inflows from net changes in debt, partially offset by $457 million of stock repurchases, $106 million of dividend payments, and $54 million of payments for income tax withholding on share-based compensation.

Liquidity / debt inflows, repurchases and distributions · Filed 22/07/2026

Interest expense, net Interest expense, net, increased $34 million to $80 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the same period in 2025, due to higher average overall debt balances in the current period, primarily related to acquisitions.

MD&A / acquisition-related increase in interest expense · Filed 22/07/2026

2025 Compensation Highlights Elements of Target Compensation Base Salary Annual Cash Incentive Long-Term Equity Incentives Weighting (%) 5% 16% 18% 30% 77% 54% 2025 Performance Metrics •Individual contribution to the business •Knowledge and experience •Capabilities and qualifications •Earnings per share (75%) •Cash conversion (25%) •Personal performance modifier (EBIT Margin %) (80%-120%) •60% performance units (at target) and 40% time-vesting restricted stock For performance units: •3-year average annual return on invested capital (50%) •3-year average cash from operating activities (50%) •Subject to relative total stockholder return (RTSR) modifier (+/- 20%) 36 / 2026 Proxy Statement Table of Contents Compensation Discussion and Analysis Say-on-Pay Results The Compensation Committee reviewed the results of the 2025 stockholder advisory vote on executive officer compensation and incorporated the results as one of the many factors considered in connection with the discharge of its responsibilities.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis / 2025 incentive metrics and equity structure · Filed 31/03/2026

20 The following table summarizes the restricted stock, restricted stock unit and incentive stock unit activity and related information for the six months ended June 30, 2026: Restricted Stock and Units Incentive Stock Units Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Outstanding at December 31, 2025 592,576 872,053 $ 147.49 Granted 205,309 209,179 $ 254.37 Vested (272,126) (348,127) $ 121.17 Adjustment for incentive stock awards expected to vest — 138,513 $ 168.69 Canceled (6,437) — $ 181.69 Outstanding at June 30, 2026 519,322 871,618 $ 193.03 10.

Stock compensation / actual grants and vesting during first-half 2026 · Filed 22/07/2026

Going forward, the Lead Independent Director will preside over executive sessions, will serve as a liaison between the Independent Directors and the CEO and will perform additional obligations identified in the Corporate Governance Guidelines •Executive sessions of non-management directors at all regular Board meetings •Audit Committee, Compensation and Talent Management Committee, Governance Committee and Risk and Public Policy Committee comprised solely of independent directors •Board commitment to recruiting qualified, and experienced director candidates with a range of backgrounds and experience •Bylaws provide a stockholder right to call special meetings •Majority voting for uncontested director elections •Proxy access for large, long-term stockholders •Year-round stockholder engagement Executive Compensation Other Governance Practices •Robust stock ownership guidelines for officers and directors •Minimum vesting of 12 months for restricted stock •Policy against hedging or pledging of Wabtec shares by officers and directors •Limits on outside directorships •External Board evaluation •Annual self-assessment •Annual review and updates to Corporate Governance Guidelines •All directors attended the 2025 Annual Meeting and 75% or more of the Board and Committee meetings in 2025 •Policy against using preferred shares for anti-takeover purposes 2026 Proxy Statement / 7 Table of Contents Proposal 1 Election of Directors Wabtec’s Board of Directors currently has nine members.

Corporate Governance Highlights / independent committees, shareholder rights and policies · Filed 31/03/2026

Your vote is very important. Voting Items Purpose Board Recommendation Page Reference 1 Elect three directors for a term of three years expiring in 2029 aFOR 8 2 Approve an advisory (non-binding) resolution to approve the 2025 named executive officer compensation aFOR 34 3 Ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2026 fiscal year aFOR 66 Misc.

Annual meeting voting items / three-year director terms · Filed 31/03/2026

OTHER INFORMATION On May 18, 2026, Rafael Santana, Wabtec's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, entered into a stock trading plan (the "Plan") designed to comply with Rule 10b5-1(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Other Information / combined Chairman and Chief Executive Officer roles · Filed 22/07/2026

In February 2026, the Company and Progress Rail agreed to settle all of Progress Rail’s claims without admission of liability by the Company, and the settlement did not have any impact on the Company’s operating results or cash flows.

Contingencies / February 2026 Progress Rail settlement · Filed 22/07/2026

All services provided by Ernst & Young LLP for fiscal year 2025 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

Audit Matters / actual pre-approval of 2025 auditor services · Filed 31/03/2026

Publication history

Publication history
VersionUpdatedCompetitive advantage
619/10/2026narrow
519/10/2026narrow
418/10/2026narrow
318/10/2026narrow
218/10/2026narrow
118/10/2026Unavailable

Sources

Research methodology and limitations · What is an economic moat?