Skip to content

Parker-Hannifin

NYSE: PH · USD

Parker-Hannifin (PH) Economic Moat Analysis56

Competitive advantages, dated evidence and erosion risks.

Narrow economic moat

Parker's aerospace engineering relationships have generated aircraft-program wins and follow-on repair and replacement business, supporting a narrow moat from customer integration and inferred switching friction. Actual aftermarket growth corroborates repeat demand, but exclusivity, switching costs and program duration are undisclosed. Realized price increases demonstrate pricing power, constrained by fixed-price contracts and cost-recovery delays. Comparable protection across the industrial portfolio is not established.

Switching costs

Aerospace engineering relationships connect original-equipment program wins to follow-on repair and replacement demand. This supports an existing customer-integration advantage; the magnitude of switching costs remains inferred rather than directly measured.

Durability
The OEM-to-aftermarket relationship is disclosed in both fiscal 2025 and 2026. Fiscal 2026 aftermarket volume growth and increased aerospace backlog corroborate continuing demand. These observations support persistence, but do not establish exclusive supply rights or exceptional long-term protection.
Competitors
Crane Co., Eaton Corporation plc, Honeywell Aerospace Inc., Moog Inc., RTX Corporation, Safran S.A., Senior plc, Triumph Group, Inc., Woodward, Inc.
Erosion risks
Established aerospace competitors, technological change, price competition and government modification or termination rights can erode the advantage. Rising end-market demand also contributes to reported growth, so growth alone cannot establish competitive share gains.
What would invalidate the thesis
The thesis would weaken materially if program wins ceased producing follow-on business, customers demonstrably transferred repair and replacement purchases to substitutes without meaningful friction, or Parker persistently lost program positions and aftermarket demand while the relevant markets expanded.
Evidence (5) · Counterevidence (4)

Changes since the previous analysis

  • Retain the narrow verdict: current catalog passages support aerospace program integration and repeat aftermarket demand, without establishing a wide or uniform company-wide moat.
  • Retain the previous moat and pricing grades after reassessing current catalog evidence; fiscal 2025 price increases strengthen the multiyear pricing record.
  • Reduce governance from 3 to 2 because the supplied change-in-control disclosures include excise-tax gross-ups and a voluntary resignation window qualifying as Good Reason, tempering otherwise strong oversight structures.
  • Clarify that the $9.25 billion acquisition was completed on August 13, 2026 and primarily financed through borrowings; its operating returns remain unproven in these passages.

Evidence limitations

  • The catalog consists of issuer filings, proxy disclosures and earnings exhibits, including an auditor opinion reproduced in a filing. Customer relationships and competitive leadership are management descriptions; reported operating results corroborate demand but do not independently measure switching costs.
  • Named aerospace and industrial competitors are disclosed, but comparative customer outcomes, market shares, substitution costs and competitor economics are absent. Industrial product customization alone does not establish a separate moat.
  • Aircraft-program lives, aftermarket exclusivity, customer retention rates, pricing magnitudes and the proportion of fixed-price contracts are undisclosed. Retention is assessed indirectly from follow-on business and actual demand.
  • No separate network effect, efficient-scale barrier or demonstrated relative cost advantage is established. Acquisition capabilities and management targets are not treated as achieved moat expansion.
  • Source dates are treated as filed dates, retaining their supplied dateKind. The September 2026 proxy describes existing arrangements; the October 28, 2026 meeting proposals are not treated as approved outcomes.

Financial indicators to test against the thesis

Calculated from annual filings. Missing data remains unavailable. Detailed financial charts remain in the other topics.

Financial indicators to test against the thesis
PeriodGross marginOperating marginROICFCF margin
202228.2%18.8%14.9%13.9%
202333.7%17.9%13.6%13.6%
202435.8%20.4%15.8%15.0%
202536.9%21.9%18.3%16.8%
202637.7%23.6%18.8%18.2%

Pricing power69

  • Pricing outcomes

    Fiscal 2025 industrial price increases, fiscal 2026 first-half price increases and favorable full-year pricing across both industrial regions demonstrate repeated practical pricing ability. Price magnitude and distinct aerospace realization are not quantified.

  • Customer demand

    Actual follow-on aerospace business, aftermarket volume growth and increasing backlog provide strong indirect evidence of repeat demand. Industrial organic demand grew alongside favorable pricing. These observations do not establish a retention rate or rule out customer losses following price increases.

  • Margin resilience

    Industrial annual margins improved in fiscal 2025 despite lower sales volume and in fiscal 2026 despite material-cost and other pressures, with pricing contributing. Mix, divestitures and restructuring also helped. The March quarter's decline despite favorable pricing limits the strength of the conclusion.

  • Pricing freedom

    Observed increases show some practical freedom to reprice. Disclosed fixed-price terms, cost-recovery delays and government modification or termination rights constrain that freedom. The affected share of revenue is unavailable.

Management63

  • Capital discipline

    Fiscal 2026 operating cash flow of $4.364 billion supported investment, acquisitions, distributions and net debt repayment. Higher inventory days and the subsequent $9.25 billion acquisition financed primarily through borrowings make allocation outcomes mixed. Acquisition returns and repurchase value creation are not established.

  • Incentive alignment

    Operating three-year LTIP arrangements use revenue, EPS and ROIC goals; actual vesting and a disclosed performance-linked payout corroborate implementation. Ownership-guideline compliance and an adopted clawback support alignment. Individual ownership amounts and full target rigor are absent, while change-in-control benefits weaken the overall package.

  • Execution

    Aerospace organic growth, industrial organic demand growth, improved annual industrial results and higher operating cash generation demonstrate execution. Attribution to management is indirect because end-market recovery and mix contribute. Quarterly margin pressure and higher inventory days temper the assessment.

  • Governance

    Annual elections, majority voting, independent committees, strong actual attendance, an independent Lead Director and the auditor's effective-control opinion support oversight. Combined chairman and CEO roles, excise-tax gross-ups and a voluntary resignation window qualifying for change-in-control benefits leave governance mixed.

Sources and methodology

Current publication · Updated 20/10/2026 · Version 9

AI interpretation based on checked source excerpts. Issuer assertions and evidence limitations remain explicit.

Policy quality-scores-3: six equally weighted categories. The overall score requires full coverage. Missing inputs are not zero. Qualitative grades are sourced interpretations, not probabilities. 6/6 · 31/10/2026

Moat56

Equal-weight average of four evidence-backed rubric grades (0–4), scaled to 100.

structural advantage · 3/4 · Achieved aerospace program wins generate follow-on repair and replacement business, supporting customer integration beyond margins alone. Switching friction is inferred. Industrial customization and a diversified IP portfolio do not establish equivalent protection throughout Parker.

durability · 2/4 · Successive annual disclosures connect OEM programs with aftermarket business, and fiscal 2026 sales and backlog support continuing demand. Undisclosed contract lives and rapidly changing technology limit demonstrated durability.

customer dependency · 2/4 · Program-linked follow-on demand demonstrates repeat purchases. The passages do not establish exclusive customer dependence, costly supplier replacement or inability to substitute competing products.

erosion resilience · 2/4 · Aerospace volume and backlog growth and favorable industrial pricing support current resilience. The actual quarterly industrial margin decline shows incomplete insulation. Named competition and technological change identify erosion channels, rather than proving realized share losses.

Pricing power69

Equal-weight average of four evidence-backed rubric grades (0–4), scaled to 100.

realized pricing · 3/4 · Fiscal 2025 industrial price increases, fiscal 2026 first-half price increases and favorable full-year pricing across both industrial regions demonstrate repeated practical pricing ability. Price magnitude and distinct aerospace realization are not quantified.

retention · 3/4 · Actual follow-on aerospace business, aftermarket volume growth and increasing backlog provide strong indirect evidence of repeat demand. Industrial organic demand grew alongside favorable pricing. These observations do not establish a retention rate or rule out customer losses following price increases.

margin resilience · 3/4 · Industrial annual margins improved in fiscal 2025 despite lower sales volume and in fiscal 2026 despite material-cost and other pressures, with pricing contributing. Mix, divestitures and restructuring also helped. The March quarter's decline despite favorable pricing limits the strength of the conclusion.

contractual freedom · 2/4 · Observed increases show some practical freedom to reprice. Disclosed fixed-price terms, cost-recovery delays and government modification or termination rights constrain that freedom. The affected share of revenue is unavailable.

Predictability92

5 consecutive published annual periods. Equal weights: nondeclining revenue frequency; revenue-growth volatility (5–40pp); positive FCF frequency; FCF-margin volatility (3–20pp). Stability indicator, not a growth forecast.

Nondeclining revenue years (%)
75.00
Revenue growth volatility (pp)
7.60
Positive FCF years (%)
100.00
FCF margin volatility (pp)
1.73
observedAnnualPeriods
5.00

Financial strength75

Equal-weight grades: debt/FCF (1–8x), net debt/earnings before interest and tax (0–5x), interest service (1–12x), current ratio (0.75–2x). Earnings use reported operating income, an original issuer-reported unadjusted EBIT reconciled to net income, income tax and signed net interest, or reported pretax profit plus reported gross interest expense. Reported EBIT is distinct from GAAP operating income and gross interest. Interest service uses earnings/interest expense; if unavailable, it uses reported operating cash flow/cash interest paid, without relabeling cash paid as accrued expense. Nonpositive cash flow/earnings score 0 for their service component; reported zero interest with a positive numerator scores 100. Net cash scores 100 for net leverage. Missing disclosures remain unavailable. General nonfinancial-company rubric, not a credit rating; exceptional and nonoperating gains are not normalized out. IFRS finance-cost and cash-flow classifications retain their reported scope.

debtFcfGrade
86.95
netDebtEbitGrade
72.49
interestCoverageGrade
100.00
currentRatioGrade
40.98
Debt / FCF (x)
1.91
Net debt / operating income (x)
1.38
Interest coverage (x)
12.64
Current ratio (x)
1.26

Capital allocation97

Three-year equal-weight indicators: pretax return on average invested capital (0–25%; equity + debt − cash, each year and its prior year), share-count growth (0–5%, lower better), share-based cost/revenue (2–20%, lower better), consolidated FCF/net income (0–1x). Return uses reported operating income, an original issuer-reported unadjusted EBIT reconciled to net income, income tax and signed net interest, or EBIT calculated from reported pretax profit plus reported gross interest expense; the issuer-reported EBIT is distinct from GAAP operating income and gross interest; exceptional/nonoperating gains are not normalized out. Share-based cost uses the reported cash-flow add-back or, if absent, separately reported recognized compensation expense; the latter never becomes an FCF adjustment. Nonpositive net income scores 0 for cash conversion; absent income/FCF stays unavailable. ROIC remains undefined for nonpositive invested capital; the explicit asset-return alternative does not change the ROIC chart. Missing financial inputs alone never trigger an alternative. Does not establish acquisition quality or buyback timing.

3-year pre-tax operating return (%)
21.61
3-year average dilution (%)
-0.54
3-year average SBC / revenue (%)
0.80
cashConversionGrade
100.00

Management63

Equal-weight average of four evidence-backed rubric grades (0–4), scaled to 100.

capital discipline · 2/4 · Fiscal 2026 operating cash flow of $4.364 billion supported investment, acquisitions, distributions and net debt repayment. Higher inventory days and the subsequent $9.25 billion acquisition financed primarily through borrowings make allocation outcomes mixed. Acquisition returns and repurchase value creation are not established.

incentive alignment · 3/4 · Operating three-year LTIP arrangements use revenue, EPS and ROIC goals; actual vesting and a disclosed performance-linked payout corroborate implementation. Ownership-guideline compliance and an adopted clawback support alignment. Individual ownership amounts and full target rigor are absent, while change-in-control benefits weaken the overall package.

execution · 3/4 · Aerospace organic growth, industrial organic demand growth, improved annual industrial results and higher operating cash generation demonstrate execution. Attribution to management is indirect because end-market recovery and mix contribute. Quarterly margin pressure and higher inventory days temper the assessment.

governance · 2/4 · Annual elections, majority voting, independent committees, strong actual attendance, an independent Lead Director and the auditor's effective-control opinion support oversight. Combined chairman and CEO roles, excise-tax gross-ups and a voluntary resignation window qualifying for change-in-control benefits leave governance mixed.

Evidence

In the Aerospace Systems Segment, we have developed relationships with key customers based on our advanced technological and engineering capabilities, performance in quality, delivery, service, and price competitiveness.

Fiscal 2026 Form 10-K, Business, aerospace customer relationships · Filed 21/08/2026

This has enabled us to obtain significant original equipment business on new aircraft programs for our systems and components, as well as the follow-on repair and replacement business for these programs.

Fiscal 2026 Form 10-K, Business, aircraft-program wins and follow-on business · Filed 21/08/2026

This has enabled us to obtain significant original equipment business on new aircraft programs for our systems and components, as well as the follow-on repair and replacement business for these programs.

Fiscal 2025 Form 10-K, Business, aircraft-program wins and follow-on business · Filed 22/08/2025

24 Table of Contents Aerospace Systems For the years ended June 30, 2026 2025 Net sales $ 7,061 $ 6,185 Segment operating income $ 1,833 $ 1,441 Segment operating margin 26.0 % 23.3 % Net Sales The Aerospace Systems Segment operations experienced the following percentage changes in net sales: 2026 Reported sales growth 14.2 % Less: currency 0.8 % Organic sales growth 13.4 % Aerospace Systems Segment sales increased compared to prior-year due to higher volume across all market segments, especially in the commercial OEM and aftermarket market segments.

Fiscal 2026 Form 10-K, MD&A, Aerospace Systems sales · Filed 21/08/2026

Backlog June 30, 2026 2025 Backlog $ 8,498 $ 7,389 Aerospace Systems Segment backlog increased in 2026 primarily due to orders exceeding shipments in all market segments, especially in the commercial OEM and aftermarket market segments.

Fiscal 2026 Form 10-K, MD&A, Aerospace Systems backlog · Filed 21/08/2026

Although we believe that we are one of the market leaders in most of the major markets for our most significant Aerospace Systems Segment products, primary global competitors for these products include Crane Co., Eaton Corporation plc, Honeywell Aerospace Inc., Moog Inc., RTX Corporation, Safran S.A., Senior plc, Triumph Group, Inc., and Woodward, Inc.

Fiscal 2026 Form 10-K, Business, named aerospace competitors · Filed 21/08/2026

The markets we serve are characterized by rapidly changing technologies and frequent introductions of new products and services.

Fiscal 2026 Form 10-K, Risk Factors, technological change · Filed 21/08/2026

Our operations are subject to competition from a wide variety of global, regional and local competitors, which could adversely affect our results of operations by creating downward pricing pressure and/or a decline in our margins or market shares.

Fiscal 2026 Form 10-K, Risk Factors, competitive pricing and market-share pressure · Filed 21/08/2026

Agreements relating to the sale of products to government entities may be subject to termination, reduction or modification, either at the convenience of the government or for our failure to perform, or other unsatisfactory performance under the applicable contract.

Fiscal 2026 Form 10-K, Risk Factors, government contract rights · Filed 21/08/2026

Within the North America businesses, segment operating margin increased by 110 basis points in 2026 compared to 2025, primarily driven by favorable pricing and benefits from prior year divestitures, partially offset by unfavorable product mix, increased material costs and higher intangible amortization.

Fiscal 2026 Form 10-K, MD&A, North America industrial margin and pricing · Filed 21/08/2026

Within the International businesses, segment operating margin increased by 90 basis points in 2026 compared to 2025, primarily driven by favorable mix and pricing, partially offset by higher business realignment charges.

Fiscal 2026 Form 10-K, MD&A, International industrial margin and pricing · Filed 21/08/2026

Operating Margin Diversified Industrial Segment operating margin increased during the current-year quarter and first six months of fiscal 2026 in both the North America and International businesses primarily due to favorable product mix, price increases, and benefits from prior-year business realignment activities, partially offset by an increase in material costs.

December 2025 Form 10-Q, MD&A, first-half industrial price increases · Filed 30/01/2026

Operating Margin Diversified Industrial Segment operating margin increased in 2025, in both the North America and International businesses, primarily due to benefits from favorable product mix, price increases and benefits related to prior-year restructuring activities as well as cost containment initiatives, partially offset by decreased sales volume.

Fiscal 2025 Form 10-K, MD&A, industrial pricing and lower sales volume · Filed 22/08/2025

Our efforts to manage these fluctuations by, among other things, passing along price increases to our customers, may be subject to a time delay between raw material prices increasing and our ability to increase the price of our products, or we may be unable to increase the prices of our products due to pricing pressure, contract terms (including fixed-price contracts) or other factors.

Fiscal 2026 Form 10-K, Risk Factors, pass-through delays and fixed-price contracts · Filed 21/08/2026

During the current-year quarter, operating margin decreased in both the North America and International businesses primarily due to unfavorable product mix, higher business realignment charges, higher amortization expense of acquired intangibles, as well as increased material costs offset by favorable pricing.

March 2026 Form 10-Q, MD&A, quarterly industrial margin decline despite favorable pricing · Filed 01/05/2026

Organic sales growth relating to our North American businesses in 2026 increased by 3.1%, or $252 million, from 2025, driven by demand within the in-plant and industrial equipment, aerospace and defense, and off-highway markets, partially offset by lower demand within the transportation market.

Fiscal 2026 Form 10-K, MD&A, North America industrial organic growth · Filed 21/08/2026

Organic sales growth within our international businesses in 2026 increased by 3.9%, or $218 million, from prior-year levels primarily due to higher sales in the Asia Pacific region, where we experienced higher demand within the electronics and semiconductor and in-plant and industrial equipment markets, partially offset by lower demand within the transportation market.

Fiscal 2026 Form 10-K, MD&A, International industrial organic growth · Filed 21/08/2026

Diversified Industrial Segment products include standard products, as well as custom products which are engineered and produced to OEM specifications for application to particular end products.

Fiscal 2026 Form 10-K, Business, standard and OEM-specific industrial products · Filed 21/08/2026

We do not depend on any single patent, trademark, copyright, trade secret or license or group of patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets or licenses to any material extent.

Fiscal 2026 Form 10-K, Business, intellectual-property dependence · Filed 21/08/2026

Twelve Months Ended (Unaudited) June 30, (Dollars in millions) 2026 2025 Cash flows from operating activities Net income $ 3,649 $ 3,532 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation 353 354 Amortization 584 553 Stock-based compensation expense 179 159 Deferred income taxes (4) (304) Pensions and other postretirement benefits, net (68) (152) Gain on sale of businesses (9) (253) Other, net (24) 40 Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions and divestitures: Accounts receivable, net (114) 6 Inventories (272) (94) Other assets (71) 15 Accounts payable, trade 290 119 Other liabilities 10 (134) Income taxes (139) (65) Net cash provided by operating activities 4,364 3,776 Cash flows from investing activities Acquisitions, net of cash acquired (1,014) — Capital expenditures (459) (435) Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment 40 32 Proceeds from sale of businesses 16 623 Other, net 27 4 Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities (1,390) 224 Cash flows from financing activities Payments for common shares (1,262) (1,766) Proceeds from (payments for) notes payable, net (736) (364) Proceeds from long-term borrowings 23 751 Payments for long-term borrowings (24) (1,741) Dividends paid (936) (861) Other, net 1 4 Net cash used in financing activities (2,934) (3,977) Effect of exchange rate changes on cash (6) 22 Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 34 45

Fiscal 2026 earnings exhibit, unaudited annual cash-flow statement · Filed 06/08/2026

Note 20. Subsequent Event On August 13, 2026, the Company completed the FGC acquisition.

Fiscal 2026 Form 10-K, Note 20, acquisition completed August 13, 2026 · Filed 21/08/2026

The cash purchase price of $9.25 billion was funded with cash primarily through borrowings under the Credit Facilities and the commercial paper program.

Fiscal 2026 Form 10-K, Note 20, acquisition purchase price and financing · Filed 21/08/2026

•Days supply of inventory on hand was 86 days in 2026 and 82 days in 2025.

Fiscal 2026 Form 10-K, MD&A, inventory days · Filed 21/08/2026

The Company's Long Term Incentive Plans ("LTIP") provide for the issuance of unrestricted stock to certain officers and key employees based on the attainment of certain goals relating to our revenue growth, earnings per share growth and return on invested capital during a three-year performance period.

Fiscal 2026 Form 10-K, stock compensation, three-year LTIP performance measures · Filed 21/08/2026

A summary of the status and changes of shares subject to RSU and LTIP awards for employees and the related average price per share follows: RSU LTIP Awards (Shares in thousands) Number of Shares Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value Number of Shares Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value Nonvested June 30, 2025 146 $ 449.11 275 $ 438.35 Granted(1) 53 $ 748.78 143 $ 540.23 Vested (77) $ 404.16 (215) $ 309.58 Canceled (5) $ 599.71 (7) $ 622.75 Nonvested June 30, 2026 117 $ 607.65 196 $ 647.72 (1) LTIP awards granted includes an adjustment for actual performance achieved.

Fiscal 2026 Form 10-K, stock compensation, actual grants and vesting · Filed 21/08/2026

•Robust stock ownership guidelines for our Directors and executive officers (all of whom are compliant with such guidelines)

2026 proxy statement, stock ownership guideline compliance · Filed 18/09/2026

Our results for revenue growth were at top quartile, and our results for earnings per share growth and growth in average return on invested capital were between the median and top quartile performance levels, resulting in a payout at 167.36% of target.

2026 proxy statement, achieved relative performance and LTIP payout · Filed 18/09/2026

Shareholder Rights •Annual election of all Directors •Majority voting and resignation policy for uncontested Director elections •Proxy access permitted for eligible shareholders Board Independence •Board Committees are 100% comprised of independent Directors.

2026 proxy statement, shareholder rights and independent committees · Filed 18/09/2026

•Average Director attendance at all of our Board of Directors and Committee meetings was over 96% and each of our Directors attended at least 75% of his or her meetings of our Board of Directors and his or her Committee meetings during fiscal year 2026.

2026 proxy statement, actual fiscal 2026 board and committee attendance · Filed 18/09/2026

Also, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2026, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

Fiscal 2026 Form 10-K, auditor opinion on internal control · Filed 21/08/2026

Ms. Parmentier has been Chairman of the Board since January 2024 and Chief Executive Officer since January 2023.

Fiscal 2026 Form 10-K, combined chairman and CEO positions · Filed 21/08/2026

•for Ms. Parmentier and Messrs. Ross and Leonti, a “gross-up” payment to offset the effect, if any, of the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code.

2026 proxy statement, change-in-control excise-tax gross-up provisions · Filed 18/09/2026

“Good Reason” for termination of employment by the Named Executive Officer includes diminution in duties, reduction in compensation or benefits, relocation, or resignation from employment by the executive for any or no reason during the 180-day period beginning on the 91st day after the Change in Control.

2026 proxy statement, Good Reason includes a post-change-in-control voluntary resignation window · Filed 18/09/2026

Clawback Provisions Our Board of Directors adopted a Section 16 officer clawback policy effective as of December 1, 2023, which complies with the required standards of the New York Stock Exchange and the SEC (the “NYSE Clawback Policy”).

2026 proxy statement, adopted officer clawback policy · Filed 18/09/2026

While our primary global competitors include Bosch Rexroth AG, Copeland, Danaher Corporation, Danfoss A/S, Donaldson Company, Inc., Emerson/ASCO, Festo SE & Co., Freudenberg-NOK, Gates Corporation, IMI/Norgren, SMC Corporation, Swagelok Company, and Trelleborg AB, none of these businesses compete with every group or product in our Diversified Industrial Segment.

Fiscal 2026 Form 10-K, Business, named industrial competitors and product coverage · Filed 21/08/2026

Oversight of Risk •Our Chairman of the Board and independent Lead Director ensure the entire Board of Directors maintains regular oversight of key risk areas, such as corporate strategy, management succession planning, cybersecurity, enterprise risk management, and sustainability matters.

2026 proxy statement, independent Lead Director and risk oversight · Filed 18/09/2026

Publication history

Publication history
VersionUpdatedCompetitive advantage
931/10/2026narrow
828/10/2026narrow
724/10/2026narrow
623/10/2026narrow
522/10/2026narrow
419/10/2026narrow
318/10/2026uncertain
218/10/2026uncertain
118/10/2026Unavailable

Sources

Research methodology and limitations · What is an economic moat?