Skip to content

Marvell Technology

NASDAQ: MRVL · USD

Marvell Technology (MRVL) Economic Moat Analysis63

Competitive advantages, dated evidence and erosion risks.

Narrow economic moat

Marvell has a narrow moat rooted in customer design integration: replacing a selected chip supplier entails significant cost, time, effort and risk. Its integrated technology platform supports this position, but comparative technology superiority is less firmly established. Protection is strongest within an existing customer system; subsequent design competitions remain contestable. Historical price reductions, cancellable orders and customer incentives constrain pricing power. Strong revenue and operating-profit growth support current commercial relevance, without establishing exceptional durability.

Switching costs

Customer-specific semiconductor development and integration create meaningful switching friction after supplier selection. The filing explicitly describes the difficulty of displacing an incumbent supplier; applying that mechanism to Marvell's installed designs supports a current, program-specific advantage.

Durability
Likely strongest during the life of an integrated customer system. Lengthy collaborative development supports persistence, but the passages do not establish program lifetimes or protection across successive chip generations.
Competitors
Broadcom, AMD, Alchip Technologies
Erosion risks
Switching friction also protects competing incumbents. New design competitions reopen supplier selection. Customers can defer orders without significant penalties, and customer warrants show that commercial relationships can require economic concessions. A shareholder proposal alleges lost or threatened design wins, but these allegations are not established operating outcomes.
What would invalidate the thesis
Repeated confirmed displacement from existing production systems without material redesign burdens, or sustained loss of follow-on programs accompanied by declining repeat product demand, would undermine the advantage. Evidence that customers routinely interchange suppliers within an existing system would directly invalidate the switching-cost mechanism.
Evidence (6) · Counterevidence (7)

Changes since the previous analysis

  • No comparable previous version.

Evidence limitations

  • Assessment uses only the supplied passages. Source dates are filing dates: March 11, May 13 and August 28, 2026. The August 18 customer warrant is a subsequent event, not an August 1 balance-sheet outcome.
  • Switching friction is explicitly described for displacing a competitor; its benefit to Marvell as an incumbent is a reasoned application of that disclosed mechanism. Program-level retention rates, contract durations and confirmed follow-on design outcomes are absent.
  • Broadcom and AMD are identified in competitor consolidation disclosures. Alchip Technologies and additional Broadcom competition appear in shareholder-proposal allegations. Competitor coverage is incomplete and does not establish relative market shares or technical performance.
  • The shareholder proposal's reported design losses and customer discussions are attributed allegations, not confirmed company disclosures. The independent-chair proposal's voting outcome is not supplied.
  • Technology differentiation and engineering improvements are issuer descriptions. Revenue and financial results demonstrate commercial activity but do not independently prove technological superiority or isolate organic growth from acquisitions.
  • No sustained pricing premium, comparable-product price series or customer-level profitability is supplied. Gross-margin changes can reflect product mix and acquisition accounting.
  • Actual incentive policies and governance arrangements are supplied, but executive beneficial ownership, detailed long-term award outcomes and comprehensive acquisition returns are missing. No exceptional durability is established.

Financial indicators to test against the thesis

Calculated from annual filings. Missing data remains unavailable. Detailed financial charts remain in the other topics.

Financial indicators to test against the thesis
PeriodGross marginOperating marginROICFCF margin
202246.3%-7.8%—14.6%
202350.5%4.0%—18.3%
202441.6%-10.3%—18.8%
202541.3%-12.5%—24.2%
202651.0%16.1%7.0%17.0%

Pricing power44

  • Pricing outcomes

    Historical product prices have decreased, including proactive reductions anticipating competition. Occasional inflation-related increases do not establish durable pricing power. Customer warrants recognized against revenue further qualify headline sales economics.

  • Customer demand

    Switching friction and vested revenue-linked customer warrants support continuing commercial engagement. This is indirect retention evidence, not a measured renewal rate. Actual cancellations or deferrals and unconfirmed follow-on design-loss allegations temper the assessment.

  • Margin resilience

    For the six months ended August 1, 2026, gross profit rose to $2,716.4 million from $1,963.0 million and operating income to $799.1 million from $560.7 million; gross margin also improved. These are strong demonstrated recent results despite historical pricing pressure, but mix and acquisition effects prevent attributing them solely to pricing power.

  • Pricing freedom

    Purchase-order selling and customers' ability to cancel or defer without significant penalties provide weak volume protection. Milestone-based engineering payments offer some negotiated cost recovery, but customer warrants and disclosed exposure to insufficient engineering reimbursement indicate constrained bargaining power.

Management56

  • Capital discipline

    Operating cash generation of $1.8 billion and completed capital returns show substantial financial capacity. Returns of approximately $2.2 billion exceeded operating cash flow, while divestiture proceeds complicate interpretation. Working-capital absorption, stock compensation, a licensing impairment, manufacturing commitments, higher debt and convertible financing make discipline mixed; acquisition returns are not established.

  • Incentive alignment

    Actual fiscal 2026 incentives link pay to revenue and profitability; hedging prohibitions and double-trigger benefits support alignment. Semiannual targets and non-GAAP metrics limit evidence of sustained capital-return accountability. Executive ownership and detailed long-term award outcomes are not supplied.

  • Execution

    Fiscal 2026 revenue growth and subsequent revenue and operating-profit gains demonstrate strong commercial execution. Management also reports improved first-pass silicon success and shorter tape-out cycles, but those internal metrics are issuer-reported and lack absolute baselines. Operating results are indirect evidence of management effectiveness and do not isolate acquisition contributions.

  • Governance

    Independent audit, compensation and nominating committees, a lead independent director and related-party review provide concrete oversight mechanisms. Combined chairman and CEO roles concentrate authority. The passages establish governance structures, without demonstrating exceptional oversight effectiveness or the outcome of the independent-chair proposal.

Sources and methodology

Current publication · Updated 17/10/2026 · Version 3

AI interpretation based on checked source excerpts. Issuer assertions and evidence limitations remain explicit.

Policy quality-scores-2: six equally weighted categories. The overall score requires full coverage. Missing inputs are not zero. Qualitative grades are sourced interpretations, not probabilities. 6/6 · 18/10/2026

Moat63

Equal-weight average of four evidence-backed rubric grades (0–4), scaled to 100.

structural advantage · 3/4 · Explicit supplier substitution costs, lengthy customer collaboration and customer-specific designs establish meaningful integration barriers. The strongest evidence supports switching costs; the platform's claimed differentiation lacks comparative validation.

durability · 2/4 · Integration protects existing systems, but successive design competitions remain open. No program-life or multigeneration retention record establishes prolonged protection. Alleged design losses are contrary signals requiring confirmation.

customer dependency · 3/4 · Replacing an integrated supplier entails significant customer cost, time, effort and risk. This demonstrates dependency within a system, although purchase orders remain cancellable and the evidence does not establish guaranteed volumes.

erosion resilience · 2/4 · Substantial revenue and operating-profit growth show current commercial resilience despite actual historical price reductions. Competitive design selection, potential architectural obsolescence and manufacturing cost rigidity constrain confidence; hypothetical disruption is not treated as a realized loss.

Pricing power44

Equal-weight average of four evidence-backed rubric grades (0–4), scaled to 100.

realized pricing · 1/4 · Historical product prices have decreased, including proactive reductions anticipating competition. Occasional inflation-related increases do not establish durable pricing power. Customer warrants recognized against revenue further qualify headline sales economics.

retention · 2/4 · Switching friction and vested revenue-linked customer warrants support continuing commercial engagement. This is indirect retention evidence, not a measured renewal rate. Actual cancellations or deferrals and unconfirmed follow-on design-loss allegations temper the assessment.

margin resilience · 3/4 · For the six months ended August 1, 2026, gross profit rose to $2,716.4 million from $1,963.0 million and operating income to $799.1 million from $560.7 million; gross margin also improved. These are strong demonstrated recent results despite historical pricing pressure, but mix and acquisition effects prevent attributing them solely to pricing power.

contractual freedom · 1/4 · Purchase-order selling and customers' ability to cancel or defer without significant penalties provide weak volume protection. Milestone-based engineering payments offer some negotiated cost recovery, but customer warrants and disclosed exposure to insufficient engineering reimbursement indicate constrained bargaining power.

Predictability83

Five consecutive annual periods. Equal weights: nondeclining revenue frequency; revenue-growth volatility (5–40pp); positive FCF frequency; FCF-margin volatility (3–20pp). Stability indicator, not a growth forecast.

Nondeclining revenue years (%)
75.00
Revenue growth volatility (pp)
19.96
Positive FCF years (%)
100.00
FCF margin volatility (pp)
3.17

Financial strength70

Equal-weight grades: debt/FCF (1–8x), net debt/earnings before interest and tax (0–5x), interest service (1–12x), current ratio (0.75–2x). Earnings use reported operating income, or reported pretax profit plus reported interest expense when operating income is unavailable. Interest service uses earnings/interest expense; if unavailable, it uses reported operating cash flow/cash interest paid, without relabeling cash paid as accrued expense. Nonpositive cash flow/earnings score 0 for their service component; reported zero interest with a positive numerator scores 100. Net cash scores 100 for net leverage. Missing disclosures remain unavailable. General nonfinancial-company rubric, not a credit rating; exceptional and nonoperating gains are not normalized out. IFRS finance-cost and cash-flow classifications retain their reported scope.

debtFcfGrade
63.44
netDebtEbitGrade
64.75
interestCoverageGrade
50.27
currentRatioGrade
100.00
Debt / FCF (x)
3.56
Net debt / operating income (x)
1.76
Interest coverage (x)
6.53
Current ratio (x)
2.01

Capital allocation38

Three-year equal-weight indicators: pretax return on average invested capital (0–25%; equity + debt − cash, each year and its prior year), share-count growth (0–5%, lower better), share-based cost/revenue (2–20%, lower better), consolidated FCF/net income (0–1x). Return uses reported operating income or, if unavailable, EBIT calculated from reported pretax profit plus reported interest expense; exceptional/nonoperating gains are not normalized out. Share-based cost uses the reported cash-flow add-back or, if absent, separately reported recognized compensation expense; the latter never becomes an FCF adjustment. Nonpositive net income scores 0 for cash conversion; absent income/FCF stays unavailable. Nonpositive invested capital has no defined return and remains unavailable. Does not establish acquisition quality or buyback timing.

3-year pre-tax operating return (%)
0.27
3-year average dilution (%)
0.38
3-year average SBC / revenue (%)
9.55
cashConversionGrade
0.00

Management56

Equal-weight average of four evidence-backed rubric grades (0–4), scaled to 100.

capital discipline · 2/4 · Operating cash generation of $1.8 billion and completed capital returns show substantial financial capacity. Returns of approximately $2.2 billion exceeded operating cash flow, while divestiture proceeds complicate interpretation. Working-capital absorption, stock compensation, a licensing impairment, manufacturing commitments, higher debt and convertible financing make discipline mixed; acquisition returns are not established.

incentive alignment · 2/4 · Actual fiscal 2026 incentives link pay to revenue and profitability; hedging prohibitions and double-trigger benefits support alignment. Semiannual targets and non-GAAP metrics limit evidence of sustained capital-return accountability. Executive ownership and detailed long-term award outcomes are not supplied.

execution · 3/4 · Fiscal 2026 revenue growth and subsequent revenue and operating-profit gains demonstrate strong commercial execution. Management also reports improved first-pass silicon success and shorter tape-out cycles, but those internal metrics are issuer-reported and lack absolute baselines. Operating results are indirect evidence of management effectiveness and do not isolate acquisition contributions.

governance · 2/4 · Independent audit, compensation and nominating committees, a lead independent director and related-party review provide concrete oversight mechanisms. Combined chairman and CEO roles concentrate authority. The passages establish governance structures, without demonstrating exceptional oversight effectiveness or the outcome of the independent-chair proposal.

Evidence

If a customer’s system designer initially chooses a competitor’s product, it becomes significantly more difficult for us to sell our products for use in that system because changing suppliers can involve significant cost, time, effort and risk for our customers.

Risk factors: supplier substitution costs within a customer system · Filed 28/08/2026

We devote significant time and resources in working with our customers’ system designers to understand their future needs and to provide products that we believe will meet those needs and these bid selection processes can be lengthy.

Risk factors: lengthy collaboration with customer system designers · Filed 28/08/2026

Custom ASICs We develop custom semiconductor solutions tailored to individual customer specifications that deliver system-level differentiation for next-generation artificial intelligence, data center, compute, networking, carrier, storage, aerospace and defense applications.

Business: customer-specific custom ASIC development · Filed 11/03/2026

These custom offerings are built on our proven ASIC platform which leverages a broad suite of differentiated Marvell intellectual property including ultra-high-speed SerDes, ARM compute, security, storage, silicon photonics and advanced packaging, including die to die interconnects, chiplets, co-packaged optics (“CPO”) and custom high-bandwidth memory (“HBM”).

Business: issuer description of ASIC platform and intellectual property · Filed 11/03/2026

4 Table of Contents The following table summarizes net revenue disaggregated by end market (in millions, except percentages): Year Ended January 31, 2026 % of Total February 1, 2025 % of Total February 3, 2024 % of Total Data center $ 6,100.3 74 % $ 4,164.2 72 % $ 2,216.7 40 % Communications and other 2,094.3 26 % 1,603.1 28 % 3,291.0 60 % Total $ 8,194.6 $ 5,767.3 $ 5,507.7 Our portfolio of solutions integrate multiple analog, mixed-signal and digital intellectual property components incorporating hardware, firmware and software technologies and our system knowledge to provide our customers highly integrated solutions for their end products.

Business: fiscal 2024–2026 end-market revenue and integrated solutions · Filed 11/03/2026

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (In millions, except per share amounts) Three Months Ended Six Months Ended August 1, 2026 August 2, 2025 August 1, 2026 August 2, 2025 Net revenue $ 2,739.3 $ 2,006.1 $ 5,157.1 $ 3,901.4 Cost of goods sold 1,283.7 995.5 2,440.7 1,938.4 Gross profit 1,455.6 1,010.6 2,716.4 1,963.0 Operating expenses: Research and development 741.1 519.0 1,393.4 1,026.7 Selling, general and administrative 257.6 192.8 516.0 379.2 Restructuring related charges (gains), net (2.8) 8.7 7.9 (3.6) Total operating expenses 995.9 720.5 1,917.3 1,402.3 Operating income 459.7 290.1 799.1 560.7 Interest expense (61.6) (51.9) (114.4) (100.6) Other expense, net (19.8) (4.5) (223.1) (10.5) Interest and other loss, net (81.4) (56.4) (337.5) (111.1) Income before income taxes 378.3 233.7 461.6 449.6 Provision for income taxes 70.3 38.9 119.1 76.9 Net income $ 308.0 $ 194.8 $ 342.5 $ 372.7 Net income per share — basic $ 0.34 $ 0.23 $ 0.39 $ 0.43 Net income per share — diluted $ 0.33 $ 0.22 $ 0.38 $ 0.43 Weighted-average shares outstanding - common stock and preferred stock assuming conversion: Basic 897.4 862.6 889.6 863.7 Diluted 921.2 870.4 907.1 873.0 See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements 3 Table of Contents MARVELL TECHNOLOGY, INC.

Unaudited statements of operations: revenue, profitability and weighted-average shares · Filed 28/08/2026

One of our primary focuses is on winning competitive bid selection processes, known as “design wins,” to develop products for use in our customers’ products.

Risk factors: competitive design-win selection · Filed 28/08/2026

We typically sell products pursuant to purchase orders rather than long-term purchase commitments.

Risk factors: purchase orders rather than long-term purchase commitments · Filed 28/08/2026

Some of our customers have, and others may in the future, cancel or defer purchase orders on short notice without incurring a significant penalty.

Risk factors: actual and possible customer cancellations or deferrals · Filed 28/08/2026

For example, Broadcom acquired VMware in November 2023 and in August 2026 AMD announced its intent to acquire Taalas Inc.

Risk factors: named competitor consolidation examples · Filed 28/08/2026

An analyst downgrade in December 2025 cited “high conviction” that Marvell lost the design wins for Amazon’s next-generation Trainium 3 and Trainium 4 AI chips to a rival, Alchip Technologies.

Independent Board Chairman shareholder proposal: attributed analyst allegation about design losses · Filed 13/05/2026

News surfaced in late 2025 that Microsoft, another key customer, was exploring rival Broadcom as a potential chip design partner, adding to shareholder jitters about customer retention.

Independent Board Chairman shareholder proposal: report of potential alternative customer partner · Filed 13/05/2026

On August 18, 2026, the Company issued a warrant (the “Warrant”) to a customer to purchase up to an aggregate of 58,970,907 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $206.58 per share, in connection with a commercial agreement between the Company and the customer relating to the development of custom semiconductor products (the “Commercial Agreement”).

Other information: August 18, 2026 customer warrant connected to custom semiconductor commercial agreement · Filed 28/08/2026

While prices of our products have increased at times due to inflation and additional costs resulting from securing an increase in supply, the prices of our products have historically decreased.

Risk factors: historical product pricing outcomes · Filed 28/08/2026

In the past, we have reduced the average selling prices of our products in anticipation of future competitive pricing pressures, new product introductions by us or by our competitors and other factors.

Risk factors: realized anticipatory selling-price reductions · Filed 28/08/2026

The Fiscal 2025 Warrant Shares vest primarily based on the customer’s achievement of qualifying product revenue milestones and are recognized as a reduction to revenue as qualifying revenues are recognized during the vesting term.

Financial statement notes: customer warrant revenue milestones and revenue reductions · Filed 28/08/2026

A total of 1.2 million Fiscal 2025 Warrant Shares were vested as of August 1, 2026.

Financial statement notes: fiscal 2025 customer warrant shares vested by August 1, 2026 · Filed 28/08/2026

In addition, the costs related to this type of business model typically include significant NRE costs that customers pay based on the completion of milestones.

Risk factors: milestone-based customer payments for nonrecurring engineering costs · Filed 28/08/2026

Our operating margin may decline if our customers do not agree to pay for NREs, if they do not pay enough to cover the costs we incur in connection with NREs, or non-payment of previously agreed NRE costs.

Risk factors: potential shortfall or nonpayment of nonrecurring engineering costs · Filed 28/08/2026

For example, AI-driven advances in chiplet-based architectures, advanced packaging, or novel materials science could render certain of our existing product lines, manufacturing processes, or intellectual property less valuable or obsolete.

Risk factors: potential technological obsolescence from AI-driven architectural advances · Filed 28/08/2026

Additionally, because we do not operate our own manufacturing, assembly, testing or packaging facilities, we are not able to reduce our costs as rapidly as companies that operate their own facilities and our costs may even increase, which could also reduce our gross margin.

Risk factors: disclosed manufacturing cost-adjustment disadvantage · Filed 28/08/2026

58 Table of Contents Cash Flows from Operating Activities Net cash provided by operating activities was $1.8 billion for fiscal 2026 compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $1.7 billion for fiscal 2025.

Cash flows: fiscal 2026 and fiscal 2025 operating cash generation · Filed 11/03/2026

We had a net income of $2.7 billion adjusted for the following non-cash items: gain on sale of our automotive ethernet business of $1.8 billion, amortization of acquired intangible assets of $942.0 million, stock-based compensation expense of $590.8 million, depreciation and amortization of $348.6 million, deferred income tax of $42.2 million, restructuring related gains of $14.0 million, and $109.5 million net loss from other non-cash items.

Cash flows: divestiture gain, acquired-intangible amortization and stock compensation · Filed 11/03/2026

Cash outflow from working capital of $1.1 billion for fiscal 2026 was primarily driven by increases in accounts receivable, inventories, and prepaid expenses and other assets, partially offset by increases in accrued liabilities and other non-current liabilities, and accounts payable.

Cash flows: fiscal 2026 working-capital outflow · Filed 11/03/2026

The Company currently estimates that it has agreed to purchase level commitments of at least $458.2 million of wafers, substrates, and other manufacturing products for fiscal 2027 through fiscal 2033 under the capacity reservation agreements.

Commitments: manufacturing purchase obligations for fiscal 2027–2033 · Filed 11/03/2026

In the third quarter of fiscal 2025, the Company ceased use of this arrangement due to restructuring actions taken during the quarter, resulting in recognition of asset impairment charges.

Commitments: discontinued technology licensing arrangement and impairment · Filed 11/03/2026

We also significantly increased capital returns to our stockholders, returning approximately $2.2 billion through share repurchases and dividends.

CEO shareholder letter: fiscal 2026 completed capital returns · Filed 13/05/2026

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ‑ (Continued) On March 31, 2026, the Company completed the issuance and sale of 2.0 million shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.002 per share (the “Series A Preferred Stock”), to NVIDIA Corporation (“NVIDIA”), for an aggregate purchase price of $2.0 billion.

Equity note: completed convertible preferred stock financing · Filed 28/08/2026

Each share of Series A Preferred Stock has a stated value of $1,000 and is initially convertible, at the option of the holder, into shares of the Company’s common stock at an initial conversion price of approximately $91.84 per share into an aggregate maximum of approximately 21.8 million shares of common stock, subject to the satisfaction of applicable regulatory requirements, including the expiration or termination of any applicable waiting period.

Equity note: preferred stock conversion terms · Filed 28/08/2026

Since 2018, the percentage of programs achieving first-pass silicon success, moving from A0 to production, has improved by 90%, while average tape-out cycle time has decreased by approximately 60%.

CEO shareholder letter: reported engineering execution improvements since 2018 · Filed 13/05/2026

The fiscal 2026 AIP was based on three corporate financial metrics: ▪ revenue (50%), ​ ▪ non-GAAP gross margin (defined as non-GAAP gross profits from continuing operations divided by revenue) (15%), and ​ ▪ non-GAAP operating income margin (defined as non-GAAP operating income divided by net sales) (35%).

Compensation discussion: actual fiscal 2026 annual incentive metrics · Filed 13/05/2026

To promote pay-for-performance and protect stockholder value, the ECC deliberately uses two six month performance periods in the AIP rather than a single, year long period.

Compensation discussion: semiannual incentive performance periods · Filed 13/05/2026

​ ​ WHAT WE DON’T DO​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ We do not allow our directors or officers to hold Marvell securities in a margin account or pledge Marvell securities as collateral for a loan or to engage in hedging or monetization transactions, including derivative transactions, short sales, or transactions in publicly traded options on our common stock.

Compensation policies: prohibition of officer and director hedging and pledging · Filed 13/05/2026

Benefits are only payable upon the occurrence of an Involuntary Termination of employment during the period beginning on the signing of a definitive agreement to sell the Company and ending on the date that is 24 months following the Change in Control (i.e., double trigger).

Compensation discussion: double-trigger change-in-control benefits · Filed 13/05/2026

Each of the Audit Committee, ECC, and N&G Committee is chaired by an independent director and composed solely of independent directors.

Board response: actual independent committee composition · Filed 13/05/2026

As part of its annual governance review in March 2023, and reaffirmed in April 2024, April 2025, and May 2026, the Board evaluated the considerations of a combined Chairman and CEO leadership structure, market practices, and the Company’s practices for ensuring independent Board oversight of management, and concluded that combining the roles of Chairman and CEO, in combination with a lead independent director, is the most effective leadership structure for the Company.

Board response: combined chairman and CEO structure with lead independent director · Filed 13/05/2026

2026 Proxy Statement ​ ​ 55 ​ TABLE OF CONTENTS​ CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS The Audit Committee is responsible for the review, approval, or ratification of “related-person transactions” between us or our subsidiaries and related persons.

Related-party transactions: Audit Committee review responsibility · Filed 13/05/2026

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (In millions, except par value per share) August 1, 2026 January 31, 2026 ASSETS Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 3,932.8 $ 2,638.8 Accounts receivable, net 2,218.4 2,186.6 Inventories 1,360.6 1,388.0 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 407.5 247.2 Total current assets 7,919.3 6,460.6 Property and equipment, net 1,071.0 935.0 Goodwill 13,873.9 11,062.2 Acquired intangible assets, net 2,346.6 1,754.7 Deferred tax assets 322.3 345.9 Other non-current assets 2,021.5 1,726.9 Total assets $ 27,554.6 $ 22,285.3 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY Current liabilities: Accounts payable $ 797.9 $ 1,073.8 Accrued liabilities 1,425.8 1,337.1 Accrued employee compensation 275.8 309.8 Short-term debt — 499.8 Total current liabilities 2,499.5 3,220.5 Long-term debt 4,962.9 3,970.8 Other non-current liabilities 1,560.6 785.6 Total liabilities 9,023.0 7,976.9 Commitments and contingencies (Note 9) Stockholders’ equity: Preferred stock, $0.002 par value; 8.0 shares authorized; 2.0 shares issued and outstanding as of August 1, 2026 of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (none issued and outstanding as of January 31, 2026) — — Common stock, $0.002 par value 1.8 1.7 Additional paid-in capital 16,939.2 12,950.9 Retained earnings 1,590.6 1,355.8 Total stockholders’ equity 18,531.6 14,308.4 Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 27,554.6 $ 22,285.3 See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements 2 Table of Contents MARVELL TECHNOLOGY, INC.

Unaudited balance sheets: cash, debt, goodwill and equity · Filed 28/08/2026

Publication history

Publication history
VersionUpdatedCompetitive advantage
318/10/2026narrow
218/10/2026narrow
118/10/2026Unavailable

Sources

Research methodology and limitations · What is an economic moat?