Skip to content

Fiserv

NASDAQ: FISV · USD

Fiserv (FISV) Economic Moat Analysis63

Competitive advantages, dated evidence and erosion risks.

Narrow economic moat

Fiserv has a narrow switching-cost moat in processing workflows, supported by multi-year contracts, minimum fees, implementation requirements and continued Wells Fargo processing after alliance non-renewal. Migration costs and renewal rates remain unquantified. Pricing power is unproven: value-based pricing is management's assertion, while operating results show substantial cost and margin pressure. Approximately flat first-half 2026 processing revenue supports persistence, but organic revenue declined 4%. Scale, proprietary technology and transformation plans do not establish additional moats.

Switching costs

Embedded processing workflows, implementation activity and multi-year contractual commitments support a current switching-cost advantage. Continued Wells Fargo processing following alliance non-renewal provides a concrete example of relationship persistence.

Durability
Multi-year processing arrangements recur in the 2023 and 2025 disclosures, and minimum processing and maintenance fees provide contractual persistence. Durability beyond existing contracts is less certain because migration costs, renewal economics and customer attrition are unquantified.
Competitors
Comparison not established
Erosion risks
Competition is intensifying, some hosted software arrangements permit customer possession and alternative hosting, and alliance relationships can change. First-half 2026 organic revenue decline and rising processing costs demonstrate economic pressure, although neither establishes customer departures or price concessions.
What would invalidate the thesis
The thesis would be undermined by sustained processing-customer losses at renewal, evidence that customers routinely migrate with little cost or disruption, or repeated renewal concessions that eliminate the economic benefit of contractual persistence. Loss of processing relationships following alliance separations would weaken the concrete persistence evidence.
Evidence (7) · Counterevidence (4)

Changes since the previous analysis

  • Narrow verdict and existing numerical grades retained after re-examination against the supplied catalog; realized_pricing remains unsupported and null.
  • Removed unsupported references to the incoming CEO's achieved turnaround or future award outcomes. The June appointment and July Financial Solutions leadership departure limit execution visibility.
  • Ownership-policy evidence is now explicit: reported compliance includes officers still on track, and unvested RSUs count toward requirements. This does not establish actual executive shareholdings.
  • Retained the distinction between persistent processing activity and weaker overall results; neither revenue decline nor margin compression establishes realized price cuts.

Evidence limitations

  • The catalog does not establish named competitors in a competitive relationship. Companies named as employers, acquisition targets or counterparties are not treated as competitors; Wells Fargo supports only the disclosed processing relationship.
  • Renewal rates, customer migration costs, customer-level attrition and renewal concessions are not quantified. Implementation spending is Fiserv's capitalized cost, not a measurement of customers' switching costs.
  • High renewal rates and value-based pricing are issuer assertions. Reported processing activity and contractual disclosures support a bounded switching-cost conclusion, but do not isolate realized pricing from volume, mix or other revenue effects.
  • Scale, proprietary systems and AI transformation plans lack demonstrated comparative cost, network-effect or intellectual-property advantages sufficient to establish separate moats.
  • Actual executive ownership amounts and post-departure replacement-award settlement outcomes are absent. The financial-statement correction indication does not establish severity, cause or a material weakness.
  • All source dates cited are filing dates, retaining dateKind=filed. The latest supplied operating results cover June 30, 2026; subsequent operating performance is not established.

Financial indicators to test against the thesis

Calculated from annual filings. Missing data remains unavailable. Detailed financial charts remain in the other topics.

Financial indicators to test against the thesis
PeriodGross marginOperating marginROICFCF margin
2021—14.1%3.4%17.7%
2022—21.1%5.8%17.7%
2023—26.3%7.7%19.8%
2024—28.7%9.7%24.7%
2025—27.5%8.9%20.3%

Pricing power—

  • Pricing outcomes

    Management describes value-based pricing, but the catalog provides no realized price changes or price-volume-mix bridge. Approximately flat processing revenue and declining overall organic revenue cannot isolate pricing outcomes. Margin deterioration likewise does not establish price cuts or failed repricing.

  • Customer demand

    Multi-year commitments, issuer-stated high renewals and continued Wells Fargo processing support repeat demand. Approximately flat first-half processing revenue provides indirect operating evidence. Customer-level renewal rates and churn remain unavailable, and stable aggregate revenue can conceal customer gains and losses.

  • Margin resilience

    The processing cost ratio improved in 2024, then deteriorated in 2025. First-half 2026 processing costs rose against approximately flat processing revenue, and both segments suffered substantial margin compression. Lower license and analytics sales and higher personnel costs explain part of the weakness; price concessions are unproven.

  • Pricing freedom

    Fixed or monthly minimum fees protect agreed contractual economics, while scope and price modifications are described as mutually agreed. Broad unilateral repricing rights are not demonstrated. Potential difficulty passing through network fee increases limits flexibility, but this risk disclosure does not establish realized concessions.

Management44

  • Capital discipline

    First-half 2026 operating cash flow of $2.082 billion exceeded $956 million of capital expenditures. Repurchases declined sharply, debt repayments exceeded proceeds and commercial paper borrowings decreased. Falling cash generation, higher investment and $329 million of transformation expense leave allocation outcomes mixed; transformation returns remain unproven.

  • Incentive alignment

    Zero 2025 cash incentive payouts and 63.4% vesting of completed 2023 PSUs demonstrate performance sensitivity. Ownership requirements support alignment, though unvested RSUs count and some officers remain on track. Transition compensation and replacement-PSU provisions allowing target vesting regardless of performance temper alignment; actual settlement is unestablished.

  • Execution

    Actual 2025 results fell below cash incentive thresholds, followed by first-half 2026 organic revenue decline, substantial operating deterioration and transformation costs. Persistent processing activity partially offsets weak execution. The June CEO appointment and July leadership departure provide no demonstrated turnaround; individual causation is not established.

  • Governance

    An existing independent chair and specified board and committee risk oversight establish substantive governance arrangements. A disclosed financial-statement correction and weak operating outcomes temper demonstrated effectiveness. The correction's severity and cause are unknown, so it does not alone establish a material control failure.

Sources and methodology

Current publication · Updated 21/10/2026 · Version 9

AI interpretation based on checked source excerpts. Issuer assertions and evidence limitations remain explicit.

Policy quality-scores-3: six equally weighted categories. The overall score requires full coverage. Missing inputs are not zero. Qualitative grades are sourced interpretations, not probabilities. 5/6 · 31/10/2026

Moat63

Equal-weight average of four evidence-backed rubric grades (0–4), scaled to 100.

structural advantage · 3/4 · Multi-year processing contracts, minimum fees, capitalized implementation activity and continued Wells Fargo processing demonstrate a current switching-cost advantage in important workflows. Its breadth and comparative strength remain unquantified; implementation spending does not directly measure customer migration costs.

durability · 2/4 · Multi-year processing arrangements appear in both 2023 and 2025 disclosures, and minimum commitments provide persistence. However, unquantified renewals, possession rights in qualifying hosted software arrangements and intensifying competition limit confidence beyond existing contract periods.

customer dependency · 3/4 · Loan, deposit, payment and card processing serve central operating functions. Implementation activity and continued Wells Fargo processing after alliance non-renewal support meaningful embeddedness. Dependency is assessed from these workflows and contractual behavior; customer migration disruption is not directly measured.

erosion resilience · 2/4 · First-half 2026 processing revenue remained approximately flat and Wells Fargo processing persisted. Nevertheless, organic revenue declined 4%, processing costs increased and both segments' operating performance weakened. Resilience is mixed; the disclosures do not establish customer departures as the cause.

Pricing power—

Insufficient evidence for every rubric criterion; no category score is inferred.

realized pricing · — · Management describes value-based pricing, but the catalog provides no realized price changes or price-volume-mix bridge. Approximately flat processing revenue and declining overall organic revenue cannot isolate pricing outcomes. Margin deterioration likewise does not establish price cuts or failed repricing.

retention · 2/4 · Multi-year commitments, issuer-stated high renewals and continued Wells Fargo processing support repeat demand. Approximately flat first-half processing revenue provides indirect operating evidence. Customer-level renewal rates and churn remain unavailable, and stable aggregate revenue can conceal customer gains and losses.

margin resilience · 1/4 · The processing cost ratio improved in 2024, then deteriorated in 2025. First-half 2026 processing costs rose against approximately flat processing revenue, and both segments suffered substantial margin compression. Lower license and analytics sales and higher personnel costs explain part of the weakness; price concessions are unproven.

contractual freedom · 2/4 · Fixed or monthly minimum fees protect agreed contractual economics, while scope and price modifications are described as mutually agreed. Broad unilateral repricing rights are not demonstrated. Potential difficulty passing through network fee increases limits flexibility, but this risk disclosure does not establish realized concessions.

Predictability100

5 consecutive published annual periods. Equal weights: nondeclining revenue frequency; revenue-growth volatility (5–40pp); positive FCF frequency; FCF-margin volatility (3–20pp). Stability indicator, not a growth forecast.

Nondeclining revenue years (%)
100.00
Revenue growth volatility (pp)
2.08
Positive FCF years (%)
100.00
FCF margin volatility (pp)
2.58
observedAnnualPeriods
5.00

Financial strength17

Equal-weight grades: debt/FCF (1–8x), net debt/earnings before interest and tax (0–5x), interest service (1–12x), current ratio (0.75–2x). Earnings use reported operating income, an original issuer-reported unadjusted EBIT reconciled to net income, income tax and signed net interest, or reported pretax profit plus reported gross interest expense. Reported EBIT is distinct from GAAP operating income and gross interest. Interest service uses earnings/interest expense; if unavailable, it uses reported operating cash flow/cash interest paid, without relabeling cash paid as accrued expense. Nonpositive cash flow/earnings score 0 for their service component; reported zero interest with a positive numerator scores 100. Net cash scores 100 for net leverage. Missing disclosures remain unavailable. General nonfinancial-company rubric, not a credit rating; exceptional and nonoperating gains are not normalized out. IFRS finance-cost and cash-flow classifications retain their reported scope.

debtFcfGrade
17.93
netDebtEbitGrade
3.06
interestCoverageGrade
25.46
currentRatioGrade
22.56
Debt / FCF (x)
6.75
Net debt / operating income (x)
4.85
Interest coverage (x)
3.80
Current ratio (x)
1.03

Capital allocation86

Three-year equal-weight indicators: pretax return on average invested capital (0–25%; equity + debt − cash, each year and its prior year), share-count growth (0–5%, lower better), share-based cost/revenue (2–20%, lower better), consolidated FCF/net income (0–1x). Return uses reported operating income, an original issuer-reported unadjusted EBIT reconciled to net income, income tax and signed net interest, or EBIT calculated from reported pretax profit plus reported gross interest expense; the issuer-reported EBIT is distinct from GAAP operating income and gross interest; exceptional/nonoperating gains are not normalized out. Share-based cost uses the reported cash-flow add-back or, if absent, separately reported recognized compensation expense; the latter never becomes an FCF adjustment. Nonpositive net income scores 0 for cash conversion; absent income/FCF stays unavailable. ROIC remains undefined for nonpositive invested capital; the explicit asset-return alternative does not change the ROIC chart. Missing financial inputs alone never trigger an alternative. Does not establish acquisition quality or buyback timing.

3-year pre-tax operating return (%)
10.66
3-year average dilution (%)
-5.21
3-year average SBC / revenue (%)
1.76
cashConversionGrade
100.00

Management44

Equal-weight average of four evidence-backed rubric grades (0–4), scaled to 100.

capital discipline · 2/4 · First-half 2026 operating cash flow of $2.082 billion exceeded $956 million of capital expenditures. Repurchases declined sharply, debt repayments exceeded proceeds and commercial paper borrowings decreased. Falling cash generation, higher investment and $329 million of transformation expense leave allocation outcomes mixed; transformation returns remain unproven.

incentive alignment · 2/4 · Zero 2025 cash incentive payouts and 63.4% vesting of completed 2023 PSUs demonstrate performance sensitivity. Ownership requirements support alignment, though unvested RSUs count and some officers remain on track. Transition compensation and replacement-PSU provisions allowing target vesting regardless of performance temper alignment; actual settlement is unestablished.

execution · 1/4 · Actual 2025 results fell below cash incentive thresholds, followed by first-half 2026 organic revenue decline, substantial operating deterioration and transformation costs. Persistent processing activity partially offsets weak execution. The June CEO appointment and July leadership departure provide no demonstrated turnaround; individual causation is not established.

governance · 2/4 · An existing independent chair and specified board and committee risk oversight establish substantive governance arrangements. A disclosed financial-statement correction and weak operating outcomes temper demonstrated effectiveness. The correction's severity and cause are unknown, so it does not alone establish a material control failure.

Evidence

Processing and services revenue, which in 2025 represented 80% of our total revenue, is primarily generated from account- and transaction-based fees under multi-year contracts that generally have high renewal rates.

2025 Form 10-K, filed 2026-02-19; Business overview, processing revenue and contracts · Filed 19/02/2026

Processing and services revenue, which in 2023 represented 82% of our total revenue, is primarily generated from account- and transaction-based fees under multi-year contracts that generally have high renewal rates.

2023 Form 10-K, filed 2024-02-22; Business overview, processing revenue and contracts · Filed 22/02/2024

The amounts disclosed above as remaining performance obligations consist primarily of fixed or monthly minimum processing fees and maintenance fees under contracts with an original expected duration of greater than one year.

June 2026 Form 10-Q, filed 2026-08-07; Revenue recognition, remaining performance obligations · Filed 07/08/2026

Capitalized sales commissions and conversion or implementation costs were as follows: December 31, (In millions) 2025 2024 Capitalized sales commissions $ 481 $ 483 Capitalized conversion or implementation costs 558 513 64 Table of Contents Capitalized contract costs are amortized based on the transfer of goods or services to which the asset relates.

2025 Form 10-K, filed 2026-02-19; Contract costs, capitalized conversion and implementation costs · Filed 19/02/2026

In connection with the non-renewal of WFMS, we entered into a multi-year agreement with Wells Fargo to provide processing for current and future merchant clients as well as other services to Wells Fargo’s merchant business.

June 2026 Form 10-Q, filed 2026-08-07; Wells Fargo processing agreement following WFMS non-renewal · Filed 07/08/2026

The businesses in our Financial segment provide products and services to financial institution, corporate and public sector clients across the world, enabling the processing of customer loan and deposit accounts, digital payments and card transactions.

June 2026 Form 10-Q, filed 2026-08-07; Financial segment processing functions · Filed 07/08/2026

Consolidated Statements of Income (In millions, except per share data) (Unaudited) Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 2025 2026 2025 Revenue: Processing and services (1) $ 4,292 $ 4,304 $ 8,362 $ 8,349 Product 1,000 1,212 1,957 2,297 Total revenue 5,292 5,516 10,319 10,646 Expenses: Cost of processing and services 1,706 1,412 3,316 2,801 Cost of product 689 694 1,386 1,378 Selling, general and administrative 1,888 1,711 3,773 3,393 Net (gain) loss on sale of assets (6) 3 (89) (17) Total expenses 4,277 3,820 8,386 7,555 Operating income 1,015 1,696 1,933 3,091 Interest expense, net (370) (365) (717) (696) Gain on early debt extinguishment 154 — 154 — Other expense, net (24) (39) (2) (57) Income before income taxes and income (loss) from investments in unconsolidated affiliates 775 1,292 1,368 2,338 Income tax provision (156) (246) (180) (436) Income (loss) from investments in unconsolidated affiliates 11 (16) 15 (24) Net income 630 1,030 1,203 1,878 Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests 3 4 5 1 Net income attributable to Fiserv, Inc.

June 2026 Form 10-Q, filed 2026-08-07; Consolidated Statements of Income, three and six months ended June 30 · Filed 07/08/2026

For arrangements involving hosted licensed software for the customer, a software element is considered present to the extent the customer has the contractual right to take possession of the software at any time during the hosting period without significant penalty and it is feasible for the customer to either operate the software on their own hardware or contract with another vendor to host the software.

2025 Form 10-K, filed 2026-02-19; Revenue recognition, hosted licensed software possession and hosting rights · Filed 19/02/2026

Because of this growth, competition also continues to intensify.

June 2026 Form 10-Q, filed 2026-08-07; Market discussion, intensifying competition · Filed 07/08/2026

•Organic revenue decreased 4% in the first six months of 2026, with a 1% decline in the Merchant Solutions segment and a 7% decline in the Financial Solutions segment.

Second-quarter 2026 earnings release, filed 2026-08-06; First-half organic revenue results · Filed 06/08/2026

(2)n/m - Not meaningful 40 Table of Contents Three Months Ended June 30, (In millions) Merchant Financial Corporate and Other Total Total revenue: 2026 $ 2,608 $ 2,355 $ 329 $ 5,292 2025 2,644 2,552 320 5,516 Revenue change $ (36) $ (197) $ 9 $ (224) Revenue change percentage (1) % (8) % (4) % Operating income (loss): 2026 $ 781 $ 912 $ (678) $ 1,015 2025 914 1,244 (462) 1,696 Operating income (loss) change $ (133) $ (332) $ (216) $ (681) Operating income (loss) change percentage (14) % (27) % (40) % Operating margin: 2026 30.0 % 38.7 % 19.2 % 2025 34.6 % 48.7 % 30.7 % Operating margin change (1) (460) bps (1,000) bps (1,150) bps Six Months Ended June 30, (In millions) Merchant Financial Corporate and Other Total Total revenue: 2026 $ 4,981 $ 4,657 $ 681 $ 10,319 2025 5,016 4,969 661 10,646 Revenue change $ (35) $ (312) $ 20 $ (327) Revenue change percentage (1) % (6) % (3) % Operating income (loss): 2026 $ 1,407 $ 1,789 $ (1,263) $ 1,933 2025 1,724 2,392 (1,025) 3,091 Operating income (loss) change $ (317) $ (603) $ (238) $ (1,158) Operating income (loss) change percentage (18) % (25) % (37) % Operating margin: 2026 28.3 % 38.4 % 18.7 % 2025 34.4 % 48.1 % 29.0 % Operating margin change (1) (610) bps (970) bps (1,030) bps (1)Represents the basis point change in operating margin.

June 2026 Form 10-Q, filed 2026-08-07; Segment revenue, operating income and margin comparisons · Filed 07/08/2026

Furthermore, we believe that our strength in distribution, our progress growing software and services, and our value-based pricing as we continue to invest in our operating systems, gives us a solid foundation for growth.

June 2026 Form 10-Q, filed 2026-08-07; Management assertion concerning value-based pricing · Filed 07/08/2026

Contract modifications occur when we and our customers agree to modify existing customer contracts to change the scope or price (or both) of the contract, or when a customer terminates some, or all, of the existing services provided by us.

2025 Form 10-K, filed 2026-02-19; Contract modifications, agreed scope and price changes · Filed 19/02/2026

From time to time, card associations and debit networks, including the card networks which we own and operate, increase the processing and other fees (including what is commonly called “interchange fees”) that they charge.

2023 Form 10-K, filed 2024-02-22; Risk factors, card association and debit network fee increases · Filed 22/02/2024

It is possible that competitive and other pressures will result in us absorbing a portion of such increases in the future, or not being able to increase our own fees, which would increase our operating costs, reduce our profit margin, limit our growth, and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

2023 Form 10-K, filed 2024-02-22; Risk factors, potential inability to pass through fee increases · Filed 22/02/2024

Cost of processing and services as a percentage of processing and services revenue increased to 34.4% in 2025 compared to 32.2% in 2024.

2025 Form 10-K, filed 2026-02-19; Processing cost ratio, 2025 versus 2024 · Filed 19/02/2026

Cost of processing and services as a percentage of processing and services revenue decreased to 32.2% in 2024 compared to 34.1% in 2023.

2024 Form 10-K, filed 2025-02-20; Processing cost ratio, 2024 versus 2023 · Filed 20/02/2025

The decrease in operating income and operating margin in our Financial segment in the second quarter and first six months of 2026 was primarily due to a decrease in high margin license revenue and data and analytics sales and higher personnel costs.

June 2026 Form 10-Q, filed 2026-08-07; Financial segment margin decline explanation · Filed 07/08/2026

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (In millions) (Unaudited) Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 2025 Cash flows from operating activities: Net income $ 1,203 $ 1,878 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and other amortization 1,050 897 Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets 626 673 Amortization of financing costs and debt discounts 25 22 Share-based compensation 235 215 Deferred income taxes (170) (215) Net gain on sale of assets (89) (17) Net gain on early debt extinguishment (130) — (Income) loss from investments in unconsolidated affiliates (15) 24 Originations of merchant cash advances, held for sale (37) — Proceeds from repayments and sales of merchant cash advances, originally classified as held for sale 37 — Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates 19 22 Non-cash foreign currency exchange losses 9 65 Other operating activities 4 (6) Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions: Trade accounts receivable 97 (280) Prepaid expenses and other assets (156) (612) Contract costs (129) (121) Accounts payable and other liabilities (466) (272) Contract liabilities (31) 40 Net cash provided by operating activities 2,082 2,313 Cash flows from investing activities: Capital expenditures, including capitalized software and other intangibles (956) (814) Proceeds from sale of assets 187 — Merchant cash advances, including Clover Capital program (566) — Repayments and sales of merchant cash advances, including Clover Capital program 678 — Settlement anticipation cash advances, net 188 (539) Payments for acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired — (337) Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates 8 13 Purchases of investments (16) (41) Proceeds from sale of investments 15 474 Other investing activities 3 (19) Net cash used in investing activities (459) (1,263) 4 Table of Contents Fiserv, Inc.

June 2026 Form 10-Q, filed 2026-08-07; Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, first-half operating and investing activities · Filed 07/08/2026

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (cont.) (In millions, unaudited) Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 2025 Cash flows from financing activities Debt proceeds $ 2,097 $ 3,679 Debt repayments, including redemption and other costs (2,762) (2,360) Net (repayments of) borrowings from commercial paper and short-term borrowings (708) 1,925 Payments of debt financing costs (2) (5) Proceeds from issuance of treasury stock 22 37 Purchases of treasury stock, including employee shares withheld for tax obligations (393) (4,642) Settlement activity, net (637) 200 Payment to acquire noncontrolling interest of consolidated subsidiary — (22) Other financing activities — 22 Net cash used in financing activities

Second-quarter 2026 earnings release, filed 2026-08-06; First-half financing cash flows · Filed 06/08/2026

The operating loss in the second quarter and first six months of 2026 included costs associated with our strategic One Fiserv transformation program of $187 million and $329 million, respectively.

June 2026 Form 10-Q, filed 2026-08-07; One Fiserv transformation expenses · Filed 07/08/2026

Because our results for adjusted revenue and adjusted operating income for 2025 were below threshold, our named executive officers did not receive any payouts under the cash incentive plan.

2026 proxy statement, filed 2026-04-02; Actual 2025 cash incentive outcome · Filed 02/04/2026

Performance Goals for 2024 In 2024, the talent and compensation committee established the achievement levels as follows: 2024 PSUs Organic Revenue Growth (40% Weighting) Adjusted Earnings Per Share (20% Weighting) Performance Multiplier Threshold 13% $8.30 50% Target 16% $8.63 100% Maximum 19% $9.00 200% Performance Goals for 2025 In 2025, the talent and compensation committee established the achievement levels as follows: 2024 / 2025 PSUs Organic Revenue Growth (40% Weighting) Adjusted Earnings Per Share (20% Weighting) Performance Multiplier Threshold 8% $9.90 50% Target 11% $10.25 100% Maximum 14% $10.60 200% 2023 Performance Share Units The performance share units granted in 2023, with a three-year performance period ended on December 31, 2025, vested at 63.4% of the target award level based on average organic revenue growth of 103% of target (40% weighting), average adjusted earnings per share growth of 110% of target (20% weighting), in each case, over the three-year period ended December 31, 2025, as well as our total shareholder return versus the S&P 500 Index over the three-year period of 0% of target (40% weighting).

2026 proxy statement, filed 2026-04-02; PSU goals and completed 2023 PSU vesting outcome · Filed 02/04/2026

(5) Represents incremental compensation expense associated with the transition of the company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), comprised of $40 million of former CEO non-cash share-based compensation and related employer payroll taxes, and a $12 million cash replacement award paid to the company’s new CEO appointed in 2025.

2026 proxy statement, filed 2026-04-02; Actual 2025 CEO transition compensation expense · Filed 02/04/2026

To emphasize this principle, we maintain a stock ownership policy that requires our executive officers to own equity having a value of at least the following: Role Stock Ownership Requirement Chief Executive Officer 12x annual base salary Other Executive Officers 4x annual base salary We believe that these levels are sufficiently rigorous to demonstrate a commitment to long-term value creation, while satisfying our executive officers’ needs for portfolio diversification.

2026 proxy statement, filed 2026-04-02; Executive stock ownership policy · Filed 02/04/2026

In assessing our officers’ compliance with stock ownership requirements, we include the value of unvested restricted stock units but we do not count performance share units.

2026 proxy statement, filed 2026-04-02; Equity counted toward executive ownership requirements · Filed 02/04/2026

All named executive officers have satisfied the ownership requirements or are otherwise on track to do so within the allotted time period.

2026 proxy statement, filed 2026-04-02; Reported executive ownership compliance or progress · Filed 02/04/2026

For the Suryadevara Replacement PSUs and Suryadevara Replacement RSUs, in the event of a termination without cause or resignation for good reason (as defined in the Suryadevara Offer Letter) absent a change of control, the Suryadevara Replacement PSUs will cliff vest at the end of the relevant performance period at target, regardless of actual performance results, and the Suryadevara Replacement RSUs will continue to vest as though a termination of employment did not occur.

2026 proxy statement, filed 2026-04-02; Suryadevara replacement award termination provisions · Filed 02/04/2026

Summary of Key Considerations • Fiserv already has an independent board chair.

2026 proxy statement, filed 2026-04-02; Existing independent board chair · Filed 02/04/2026

Board of Directors • Maintains primary oversight of strategic, operational, and financial risks • Receives information regarding our financial performance and condition from our chief executive officer and chief financial officer to understand and address current and emerging risks • Discusses with senior management and other business leaders our business strategy, operations and results, as well as developments in our industry, to enable the board to evaluate competitive and operational risks Risk Committee • Reviews and discusses with management key risks, including cybersecurity, business continuity, resiliency, technology, artificial intelligence, privacy and data management, credit, settlement, liquidity, third-party, regulatory compliance, and market risk, including product, geography and competition risks • Annually reviews, jointly with the audit committee, our ERM program, including the identification of top risks • Regularly reviews and approves a list of top enterprise risks, an enterprise risk appetite statement, and the tolerance levels for board-level risk metrics • Reviews and discusses with management the risk appetite relating to top risks, as well as the guidelines, policies and processes for monitoring and mitigating such risks • Reviews and discusses with management the risk governance structure and the guidelines, policies and processes regarding risk assessment and management • Reviews and discusses with management relevant regulatory exams, findings from such exams, and the status of the remediation of any such findings • Monitors the performance of the risk management function Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee • Working closely with management and the board, oversees management of risks associated with director succession, independence, and conflicts of interest, as well as regulatory risks related to our corporate governance programs and policies • Oversees our corporate social responsibility programs, policies, stakeholder engagement, and reporting, including identifying, evaluating and monitoring related trends, opportunities and risks • Oversees our public policy activities and, at least annually, reviews our political contributions and expenditures and political expenditure policy Fiserv, Inc.

2026 proxy statement, filed 2026-04-02; Board and committee risk oversight responsibilities · Filed 02/04/2026

☑ If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements.

2025 Form 10-K, filed 2026-02-19; Cover-page indication of correction to previously issued financial statements · Filed 19/02/2026

On June 14, 2026, Takis Georgakopoulos was appointed as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and as a member of the Board.

Form 8-K, filed 2026-06-15; CEO appointment effective June 14, 2026 · Filed 15/06/2026

Ms. Suryadevara’s resignation as President is effective as of July 7, 2026, and she will remain a non-executive officer employee eligible for her current base salary and benefit plan participation through July 31, 2026, to enable an orderly transition of her duties.

Form 8-K, filed 2026-07-07; Suryadevara resignation and transition employment · Filed 07/07/2026

Publication history

Publication history
VersionUpdatedCompetitive advantage
931/10/2026narrow
827/10/2026narrow
724/10/2026narrow
623/10/2026narrow
522/10/2026narrow
419/10/2026narrow
318/10/2026narrow
218/10/2026narrow
118/10/2026Unavailable

Sources

Research methodology and limitations · What is an economic moat?