Skip to content

Northrop Grumman

NYSE: NOC · USD

Northrop Grumman (NOC) Economic Moat Analysis63

Competitive advantages, dated evidence and erosion risks.

Narrow economic moat

Northrop Grumman has a narrow moat from embedded production and sustainment roles, specialized technical capabilities and cleared personnel. September 2026 backlog of $109.6 billion and additional awards demonstrate continuing demand, although switching friction is inferred rather than measured. Pricing power remains weak: negotiated fixed-price terms and approximately $2.0 billion of cumulative B-21 LRIP losses constrain value capture. Improving operating results support resilience, but procurement reform, supplier problems, program completion and government termination rights prevent a wide-moat conclusion.

Switching costs

Established aircraft production, modernization and sustainment responsibilities create program-specific customer dependence. Additional Sentinel, F-35 and E-2 awards demonstrate continued use of incumbent capabilities; the resulting switching friction is inferred from these operating roles, rather than directly quantified.

Durability
Multiyear programs and repeated awards support persistence across existing program cycles. B-21 LRIP execution is expected through approximately the end of the decade, but awarded work does not guarantee subsequent procurement or profits.
Competitors
The Boeing Company, General Dynamics Corporation, L3Harris Technologies, Inc., Lockheed Martin Corporation, RTX Corporation
Erosion risks
Government termination rights, program completion, concentrated purchasing power and procurement reform can reduce incumbent protection. B-21 losses show that continued customer demand need not produce attractive contract economics.
What would invalidate the thesis
Material incumbent production or sustainment responsibilities transfer to alternatives without substantial disruption; repeated follow-on awards cease; or cancellations and program completions persistently exceed replacement awards.
Evidence (6) · Counterevidence (7)

Intangible assets

Existing advanced-aircraft responsibilities, restricted-program work and requirements for specialized personnel with security clearances support an established technical and access barrier. These disclosures support incumbent capabilities, without establishing exclusive intellectual property or technical superiority over every rival.

Durability
Capabilities span historical B-2 development, current modernization and B-21 development and production. Continued restricted-program awards support present relevance, but future technological leadership remains contingent on execution and investment.
Competitors
The Boeing Company, General Dynamics Corporation, L3Harris Technologies, Inc., Lockheed Martin Corporation, RTX Corporation
Erosion risks
Talent competition, supplier performance problems and procurement routes that facilitate new entrants can erode the barrier. Restricted status alone does not establish exclusivity or pricing power.
What would invalidate the thesis
Northrop repeatedly loses technically comparable follow-on work, cannot maintain the cleared workforce needed to perform, or substitutes enter its established programs without meaningful capability or access barriers.
Evidence (5) · Counterevidence (5)

Changes since the previous analysis

  • Retain the narrow verdict and existing criterion grades after reassessment; September 2026 awards and $109.6 billion backlog strengthen evidence of continuing demand without establishing broader pricing freedom.
  • Update pricing and execution evidence to approximately $2.0 billion of cumulative B-21 LRIP losses and September 2026 segment margins; distinguish the improvement from demonstrated pricing power.
  • Replace the previous ownership-evidence limitation: the current catalog reports NEOs were compliant or on track as of December 31, 2025. Add approved 2026 performance awards, restricted-program metric caps and the approved August CEO equity grant; future vesting and payouts remain unproven.
  • Add the completed shareholder vote rejecting an independent chair and the historical restricted-Space termination, distinguishing observed events from potential risks.
  • Retain a mixed capital-discipline assessment using disclosed annual and first-half cash flows; September cash availability alone does not establish nine-month allocation outcomes.

Evidence limitations

  • Evidence is limited to supplied issuer filings. Program responsibilities, awards, losses and contractual terms support the assessment; management descriptions of leadership or strong performance do not establish exceptional competitive superiority.
  • Named competitors are disclosed at company level. The catalog does not establish comparative costs, technical rankings, market shares or competitor-specific switching outcomes across Northrop's programs.
  • Switching friction and retention are inferred from incumbent operating responsibilities and repeat awards. No switching-cost amounts, customer retention rates or exclusive intellectual-property rights are established.
  • Pricing evidence concerns negotiated terms, incentive realization and contract losses. The passages do not isolate companywide price, volume and mix effects or demonstrate broad unilateral price increases.
  • The supplied September 2026 excerpts lack a complete nine-month cash-flow statement. Capital discipline therefore combines 2025 and first-half 2026 flows with September cash, without extrapolating full-year outcomes.
  • Ownership disclosure combines actual compliance with being on track during an allowed accumulation period. Approved equity awards establish incentive design, not future vesting or realized alignment.
  • The isolated NGI bid-loss statement in q519 has an unexplained narrative style within the proxy catalog; it is not relied upon for a competitive-loss conclusion.
  • All cited source dates are filing dates, retaining dateKind filed; operating-period dates are distinguished from those filing dates.

Financial indicators to test against the thesis

Calculated from annual filings. Missing data remains unavailable. Detailed financial charts remain in the other topics.

Financial indicators to test against the thesis
PeriodGross marginOperating marginROICFCF margin
2021—15.8%20.7%6.0%
2022—9.8%12.6%4.0%
2023—6.5%8.7%5.3%
2024—10.6%13.8%6.4%
2025—10.8%13.5%7.9%

Pricing power44

  • Pricing outcomes

    Approximately $2.0 billion of cumulative B-21 LRIP losses demonstrate weak realized price-versus-cost economics on that phase, consistent with largely fixed-price terms. Achieved Sentinel incentives provide a positive counterexample. These outcomes support a numerical assessment but do not isolate companywide selling-price changes from costs, volume or mix.

  • Customer demand

    Ongoing sustainment responsibilities and additional Sentinel, F-35, E-2 and restricted-program awards demonstrate repeat demand. September backlog further supports continuing customer engagement. Retention is assessed indirectly from operating evidence, rather than a renewal rate; termination rights and completed F/A-18 deliveries limit extrapolation.

  • Margin resilience

    Year-to-date September 2026 segment margin improved to 11.2% from 10.1%, while third-quarter margin was 12.1% versus 12.3%, with the comparison affected by a prior-year favorable adjustment. Cost reimbursement protects some economics, but B-21 loss provisions demonstrate vulnerability. The mixed record does not establish broad pricing power.

  • Pricing freedom

    Fixed-price contracts generally lock in negotiated prices despite contractor cost growth, absent customer changes. Cost-type work reimburses allowable costs plus fees, offering protection rather than unilateral pricing discretion. Government termination rights and exclusion of anticipated future profit further constrain control over terms and value capture.

Management50

  • Capital discipline

    Reported 2025 operating cash flow of approximately $4.8 billion supported $2.9 billion of distributions. First-half 2026 operating cash outflow of $376 million and $469 million of capital expenditures coincided with sharply reduced repurchases and $527 million of debt payments. This shows responsive allocation, but investment returns and complete nine-month flows remain unestablished.

  • Incentive alignment

    Actual multiyear awards use cash flow, ROIC and relative returns, alongside ownership and holding requirements. The approved CEO grant extends performance measurement through 2031. Restricted-program metric caps weaken accountability, while ownership compliance includes executives merely on track. These are adopted arrangements, with future payouts and vesting still contingent.

  • Execution

    Further Sentinel authorization, achieved incentives, new awards and improved year-to-date segment margins demonstrate progress through indirect operating evidence. Approximately $2.0 billion of cumulative B-21 LRIP losses, supplier impacts and Sentinel's breach review show material weaknesses. Continued awards therefore support a mixed execution assessment rather than exceptional delivery performance.

  • Governance

    Disclosed independent committees, a lead independent director and shareholder rights provide formal safeguards. Combined chair, CEO and president roles remain after shareholders rejected an independent-chair proposal. The criminal inquiry closed, while civil and DCMA matters remain unresolved; those inquiries do not establish misconduct or independently prove oversight effectiveness.

Sources and methodology

Current publication · Updated 21/10/2026 · Version 8

AI interpretation based on checked source excerpts. Issuer assertions and evidence limitations remain explicit.

Policy quality-scores-3: six equally weighted categories. The overall score requires full coverage. Missing inputs are not zero. Qualitative grades are sourced interpretations, not probabilities. 6/6 · 28/10/2026

Moat63

Equal-weight average of four evidence-backed rubric grades (0–4), scaled to 100.

structural advantage · 3/4 · Existing advanced-aircraft and sustainment responsibilities, restricted work and specialized cleared-personnel requirements demonstrate incumbent capabilities and access barriers. Additional restricted-program awards support current relevance. Switching costs are inferred from these responsibilities; exclusive rights and superiority over named peers are not established.

durability · 2/4 · B-21's 2015 award and expected LRIP execution through approximately decade-end demonstrate a long program cycle, while September awards support continuing demand. Government termination rights and the historical restricted-Space cancellation show that persistence and future profit remain conditional rather than guaranteed.

customer dependency · 3/4 · Production, modernization and sustainment responsibilities, further Sentinel authorization and additional F-35 and E-2 awards support strong program-specific customer dependence. This is indirect operating evidence of reliance on incumbent capabilities; it does not quantify replacement costs or establish that government customers cannot change suppliers.

erosion resilience · 2/4 · Backlog rose from $95.7 billion at December 2025 to $109.6 billion in September 2026, supporting continued competitiveness. Realized supplier impacts, cumulative B-21 losses and an actual historical cancellation temper that evidence. Procurement reform has increased competitive participation, although further economic harm remains a risk rather than an established outcome.

Pricing power44

Equal-weight average of four evidence-backed rubric grades (0–4), scaled to 100.

realized pricing · 1/4 · Approximately $2.0 billion of cumulative B-21 LRIP losses demonstrate weak realized price-versus-cost economics on that phase, consistent with largely fixed-price terms. Achieved Sentinel incentives provide a positive counterexample. These outcomes support a numerical assessment but do not isolate companywide selling-price changes from costs, volume or mix.

retention · 3/4 · Ongoing sustainment responsibilities and additional Sentinel, F-35, E-2 and restricted-program awards demonstrate repeat demand. September backlog further supports continuing customer engagement. Retention is assessed indirectly from operating evidence, rather than a renewal rate; termination rights and completed F/A-18 deliveries limit extrapolation.

margin resilience · 2/4 · Year-to-date September 2026 segment margin improved to 11.2% from 10.1%, while third-quarter margin was 12.1% versus 12.3%, with the comparison affected by a prior-year favorable adjustment. Cost reimbursement protects some economics, but B-21 loss provisions demonstrate vulnerability. The mixed record does not establish broad pricing power.

contractual freedom · 1/4 · Fixed-price contracts generally lock in negotiated prices despite contractor cost growth, absent customer changes. Cost-type work reimburses allowable costs plus fees, offering protection rather than unilateral pricing discretion. Government termination rights and exclusion of anticipated future profit further constrain control over terms and value capture.

Predictability100

5 consecutive published annual periods. Equal weights: nondeclining revenue frequency; revenue-growth volatility (5–40pp); positive FCF frequency; FCF-margin volatility (3–20pp). Stability indicator, not a growth forecast.

Nondeclining revenue years (%)
100.00
Revenue growth volatility (pp)
2.02
Positive FCF years (%)
100.00
FCF margin volatility (pp)
1.27
observedAnnualPeriods
5.00

Financial strength44

Equal-weight grades: debt/FCF (1–8x), net debt/earnings before interest and tax (0–5x), interest service (1–12x), current ratio (0.75–2x). Earnings use reported operating income, an original issuer-reported unadjusted EBIT reconciled to net income, income tax and signed net interest, or reported pretax profit plus reported gross interest expense. Reported EBIT is distinct from GAAP operating income and gross interest. Interest service uses earnings/interest expense; if unavailable, it uses reported operating cash flow/cash interest paid, without relabeling cash paid as accrued expense. Nonpositive cash flow/earnings score 0 for their service component; reported zero interest with a positive numerator scores 100. Net cash scores 100 for net leverage. Missing disclosures remain unavailable. General nonfinancial-company rubric, not a credit rating; exceptional and nonoperating gains are not normalized out. IFRS finance-cost and cash-flow classifications retain their reported scope.

debtFcfGrade
46.48
netDebtEbitGrade
49.93
interestCoverageGrade
52.58
currentRatioGrade
28.10
Debt / FCF (x)
4.75
Net debt / operating income (x)
2.50
Interest coverage (x)
6.78
Current ratio (x)
1.10

Capital allocation84

Three-year equal-weight indicators: pretax return on average invested capital (0–25%; equity + debt − cash, each year and its prior year), share-count growth (0–5%, lower better), share-based cost/revenue (2–20%, lower better), consolidated FCF/net income (0–1x). Return uses reported operating income, an original issuer-reported unadjusted EBIT reconciled to net income, income tax and signed net interest, or EBIT calculated from reported pretax profit plus reported gross interest expense; the issuer-reported EBIT is distinct from GAAP operating income and gross interest; exceptional/nonoperating gains are not normalized out. Share-based cost uses the reported cash-flow add-back or, if absent, separately reported recognized compensation expense; the latter never becomes an FCF adjustment. Nonpositive net income scores 0 for cash conversion; absent income/FCF stays unavailable. ROIC remains undefined for nonpositive invested capital; the explicit asset-return alternative does not change the ROIC chart. Missing financial inputs alone never trigger an alternative. Does not establish acquisition quality or buyback timing.

3-year pre-tax operating return (%)
14.28
3-year average dilution (%)
-2.52
3-year average SBC / revenue (%)
0.25
cashConversionGrade
77.10

Management50

Equal-weight average of four evidence-backed rubric grades (0–4), scaled to 100.

capital discipline · 2/4 · Reported 2025 operating cash flow of approximately $4.8 billion supported $2.9 billion of distributions. First-half 2026 operating cash outflow of $376 million and $469 million of capital expenditures coincided with sharply reduced repurchases and $527 million of debt payments. This shows responsive allocation, but investment returns and complete nine-month flows remain unestablished.

incentive alignment · 2/4 · Actual multiyear awards use cash flow, ROIC and relative returns, alongside ownership and holding requirements. The approved CEO grant extends performance measurement through 2031. Restricted-program metric caps weaken accountability, while ownership compliance includes executives merely on track. These are adopted arrangements, with future payouts and vesting still contingent.

execution · 2/4 · Further Sentinel authorization, achieved incentives, new awards and improved year-to-date segment margins demonstrate progress through indirect operating evidence. Approximately $2.0 billion of cumulative B-21 LRIP losses, supplier impacts and Sentinel's breach review show material weaknesses. Continued awards therefore support a mixed execution assessment rather than exceptional delivery performance.

governance · 2/4 · Disclosed independent committees, a lead independent director and shareholder rights provide formal safeguards. Combined chair, CEO and president roles remain after shareholders rejected an independent-chair proposal. The criminal inquiry closed, while civil and DCMA matters remain unresolved; those inquiries do not establish misconduct or independently prove oversight effectiveness.

Evidence

Air Force B-21 Raider long-range strike aircraft that define sixth-generation technologies; •Modernization and sustainment services for the B-2 Spirit stealth aircraft; •Development and production of the E-130J Phoenix II nuclear command, control and communications (NC3) aircraft for the U.S.

2025 Form 10-K; filed 2026-01-27; Aeronautics Systems program responsibilities · Filed 27/01/2026

•Global system sustainment and operations support for the F-35, B-2, F/A-18, E-2, E-3, A-10, North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Alliance Ground Surveillance (AGS), Triton, Global Hawk, and restricted programs.

2025 Form 10-K; filed 2026-01-27; aircraft sustainment and operations support · Filed 27/01/2026

Air Force. These efforts, which included requirements and design maturation, risk reduction activities, and evaluation of options to accelerate fielding of initial capability, have resulted in further definition and authorization of elements of the program execution plan, resulting in a $7.6 billion increase in program backlog.

June 2026 Form 10-Q; filed 2026-07-21; Sentinel execution-plan authorization and backlog · Filed 21/07/2026

Backlog totaled $109.6 billion. Significant third quarter new awards include $4.6 billion for restricted programs (primarily at Aeronautics Systems, Space Systems, and Mission Systems), $2.0 billion for Sentinel, $1.4 billion for Virginia Class submarines, $1.3 billion for F-35 at Aeronautics Systems, and $1.0 billion for E-2.

September 2026 Form 10-Q; filed 2026-10-20; backlog and significant third-quarter awards · Filed 20/10/2026

B-21 Program In 2015, the U.S. Air Force awarded Northrop Grumman the B-21 contract, which includes a base contract for EMD and five low-rate initial production (LRIP) options for a baseline total of 21 aircraft.

September 2026 Form 10-Q; filed 2026-10-20; B-21 original award and baseline contract scope · Filed 20/10/2026

The LRIP options are largely fixed price and are expected to continue to be awarded and executed through approximately the end of the decade.

September 2026 Form 10-Q; filed 2026-10-20; B-21 LRIP contract type and expected execution period · Filed 20/10/2026

COMPETITIVE CONDITIONS We compete with many companies in the defense, intelligence and federal civil markets, including The Boeing Company, General Dynamics Corporation, L3Harris Technologies, Inc., Lockheed Martin Corporation, and RTX Corporation, as well as, increasingly, new entrants and startups.

2025 Form 10-K; filed 2026-01-27; named competitors and new entrants · Filed 27/01/2026

government’s continued emphasis on reforming its acquisition processes, including procuring commercial products and services and utilizing non-Federal Acquisition Regulation-based procurement methods, such as Other Transaction Authority (OTA) agreements and other contract types, has facilitated, and may continue to facilitate, participation by new and emerging market entrants, which has increased and may in the future further increase competition for the programs we pursue, which could result in reduced contract opportunities, increased pricing pressure, and/or demands to accept less favorable terms.

2025 Form 10-K; filed 2026-01-27; procurement reform and increased competition · Filed 27/01/2026

The U.S. government has the ability to terminate contracts, in whole or in part, for its convenience or for default of contract terms.

2025 Form 10-K; filed 2026-01-27; government termination rights · Filed 27/01/2026

In the event of termination for convenience, contractors are generally protected by provisions covering reimbursement for costs incurred and profit on those costs up to the amount authorized under the contract, but not the anticipated profit that would have been earned.

2025 Form 10-K; filed 2026-01-27; termination-for-convenience reimbursement and excluded future profit · Filed 27/01/2026

These increases were partially offset by lower sales on other restricted programs and a $106 million decrease on F/A-18 as final production deliveries were completed.

2025 Form 10-K; filed 2026-01-27; restricted-program sales reductions and completion of F/A-18 production deliveries · Filed 27/01/2026

Fixed-price contracts – Firm fixed-price contracts include a specified scope of work for a price that is a pre-determined, negotiated amount and not typically subject to adjustment regardless of costs incurred by the contractor, absent changes by the customer.

2025 Form 10-K; filed 2026-01-27; negotiated fixed-price contract adjustment limitations · Filed 27/01/2026

We have previously recognized and disclosed cumulative losses of approximately $2.0 billion on the LRIP phase of the program.

September 2026 Form 10-Q; filed 2026-10-20; cumulative B-21 LRIP losses · Filed 20/10/2026

Northrop Corporation was a principal developer of flying wing technology, including the B-2 Spirit stealth aircraft.

2025 Form 10-K; filed 2026-01-27; flying-wing technology and B-2 development history · Filed 27/01/2026

Approximately 40 percent of this business is performed through restricted programs.

2025 Form 10-K; filed 2026-01-27; restricted-program share of Aeronautics Systems business · Filed 27/01/2026

Our operating results and growth opportunities are heavily dependent upon our ability to attract and retain sufficient qualified personnel who are or can reasonably obtain requisite security clearances and program access, who have the requisite skills in multiple areas, including science, technology, engineering and math, and who share our values and are able to operate effectively consistent with our culture.

2025 Form 10-K; filed 2026-01-27; specialized personnel, security-clearance and program-access requirements · Filed 27/01/2026

We continue to face increased competition for talent with traditional defense companies, new entrants in our markets and commercial companies, globally, with increasing wage rates and, in some cases, greater flexibility around working conditions.

2025 Form 10-K; filed 2026-01-27; increased talent competition and wage rates · Filed 27/01/2026

Disruptions, performance problems or other issues with our suppliers, including unanticipated cost growth, failure to meet regulatory or contractual requirements, and/or unethical or illegal behavior, or a misalignment between our contractual obligations to our customers and our agreements with our suppliers, have had and may continue to have various adverse impacts on the company, including on our ability to meet our commitments to customers and financial expectations.

2025 Form 10-K; filed 2026-01-27; realized supplier-related adverse impacts · Filed 27/01/2026

We also reviewed our estimated profitability on the program and recognized a favorable earnings adjustment related to our recent achievement of certain contract incentives.

June 2026 Form 10-Q; filed 2026-07-21; favorable Sentinel earnings adjustment from achieved contract incentives · Filed 21/07/2026

Cost-type contracts generally provide for reimbursement of a contractor’s allowable costs incurred plus fee.

2025 Form 10-K; filed 2026-01-27; reimbursement of allowable costs plus fee · Filed 27/01/2026

As a result, cost-type contracts have less financial risk associated with unanticipated cost growth but generally provide lower profit margins than fixed-price contracts.

2025 Form 10-K; filed 2026-01-27; cost-type contract risk protection and margin trade-off · Filed 27/01/2026

Third quarter 2026 segment operating margin rate of 12.1 percent reflects strong program performance and higher operating margin rates at Aeronautics Systems and Space Systems.

September 2026 Form 10-Q; filed 2026-10-20; third-quarter segment operating margin and program performance · Filed 20/10/2026

Segment operating margin rate decreased from 12.3 percent in the third quarter of 2025 principally due to a prior year $68 million favorable EAC adjustment in the restricted advanced microelectronics portfolio at Mission Systems.

September 2026 Form 10-Q; filed 2026-10-20; third-quarter margin comparison and prior-year favorable EAC adjustment · Filed 20/10/2026

Segment operating margin rate increased to 11.2 percent from 10.1 percent primarily due to a higher operating margin rate at Aeronautics Systems and Mission Systems, partially offset by a lower operating margin rate at Defense Systems and Space Systems.

September 2026 Form 10-Q; filed 2026-10-20; year-to-date segment margin comparison · Filed 20/10/2026

Operating Income 2025 operating income decreased $423 million and operating margin rate decreased to 6.3 percent primarily due to a $477 million loss provision recorded on the LRIP phase of the B-21 program in the first quarter of 2025.

2025 Form 10-K; filed 2026-01-27; Aeronautics operating-income decline and B-21 loss provision · Filed 27/01/2026

BACKLOG At December 31, 2025, total backlog, which is equivalent to the company’s remaining performance obligations, was $95.7 billion as compared with $91.5 billion at December 31, 2024.

2025 Form 10-K; filed 2026-01-27; year-end backlog and remaining-performance-obligation definition · Filed 27/01/2026

Ending the year with a record backlog of $95.7 billion, we generated approximately $4.8 billion in operating cash flow and $3.3 billion in free cash flow*, reflecting an increase of 8 percent and 26 percent, respectively.

2026 proxy statement; filed 2026-04-03; reported 2025 operating cash flow and free cash flow, the latter identified as non-GAAP · Filed 03/04/2026

Cash returned to shareholders through share repurchases and dividends totaled $2.9 billion in 2025 and $3.7 billion in 2024.

2025 Form 10-K; filed 2026-01-27; cash returned through dividends and repurchases · Filed 27/01/2026

-2- Table of Contents NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) Six Months Ended June 30 $ in millions 2026 2025 Operating activities Net earnings $ 1,969 $ 1,655 Adjustments to reconcile to net cash used in operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 739 687 Stock-based compensation 49 40 Deferred income taxes 453 (114) B-21 loss provision — 477 Gain on sale of business — (231) Net periodic pension and OPB income (240) (169) Pension and OPB contributions (63) (62) Changes in assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable, net (936) (929) Unbilled receivables, net (860) (1,343) Inventoried costs, net (118) (102) Prepaid expenses and other assets 141 21 Trade accounts payable (345) (2) Advance payments and billings in excess of costs incurred (263) (70) Other liabilities (836) (420) Income taxes payable, net (38) (145) Other operating activities (28) 10 Net cash used in operating activities (376) (697) Investing activities Capital expenditures (469) (487) Proceeds from sale of investment 107 — Divestiture of training services business — 333 Other investing activities (2) (37) Net cash used in investing activities (364) (191) Financing activities Net proceeds from issuance of long-term debt — 998 Payments of long-term debt (527) (1,500) Net borrowings on commercial paper — 566 Common stock repurchases (68) (891) Cash dividends paid (684) (634) Payments of employee taxes withheld from share-based awards (58) (38) Other financing activities (19) (67) Net cash used in financing activities (1,356) (1,566) Decrease in cash and cash equivalents (2,096) (2,454) Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 4,403 4,353 Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 2,307 $ 1,899 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

June 2026 Form 10-Q; filed 2026-07-21; six-month cash-flow statement, spending, financing and shareholder distributions · Filed 21/07/2026

At September 30, 2026, we had $3.7 billion in cash and cash equivalents.

September 2026 Form 10-Q; filed 2026-10-20; period-end cash and cash equivalents · Filed 20/10/2026

Examples include: •Double-trigger provisions for change in control situations, and no excise tax gross-ups for payments upon termination after a change in control; •A recoupment policy applicable to performance based or time-based long-term cash and equity incentive compensation payments; •Stock ownership guidelines of 7x base salary for the CEO and 3x base salary for other NEOs, and stock holding requirements of three years from the date paid for 50% of all net after-tax shares received; and •Prohibitions on hedging or pledging of Company stock.

2026 proxy statement; filed 2026-04-03; ownership, holding, recoupment and anti-hedging provisions · Filed 03/04/2026

As of December 31, 2025, all NEOs were in compliance with the ownership guidelines or on track to meet the requirement by the end of the five-year period referenced above.

2026 proxy statement; filed 2026-04-03; NEO ownership-guideline compliance or progress as of 2025-12-31 · Filed 03/04/2026

•Awarded Restricted Performance Stock Rights ("RPSR") for the performance period 2026-2028 and approved the metrics for such RPSR awards (and their relative weightings), which will be measured in terms of cumulative free cash flow** (1/3); return on invested capital** (1/3); and relative total shareholder return specifically related to the S&P 500 (1/3).

February 2026 Form 8-K; filed 2026-02-13; awarded 2026–2028 performance stock rights and approved metrics · Filed 13/02/2026

** For segment operating income, cumulative free cash flow and return on invested capital, results for a restricted program will be favorably and/or unfavorably capped within a specific range aligned with plan expectations.

February 2026 Form 8-K; filed 2026-02-13; restricted-program caps for compensation performance measures · Filed 13/02/2026

(e) On August 19, 2026, the independent members of the Board of Directors of Northrop Grumman Corporation (the “Company”) approved a one-time grant of performance-based equity to Kathy J.

August 2026 Form 8-K; filed 2026-08-21; independent directors' approval of one-time CEO equity grant on 2026-08-19 · Filed 21/08/2026

A range from 0% to 150% of the target 35,910 Market Stock Units (“MSUs”) may be earned based on the Company’s absolute stock price appreciation or depreciation over a performance period ending December 31, 2031, with 0% payout if more than 25% depreciation and 150% payout if 50% or more appreciation.

August 2026 Form 8-K; filed 2026-08-21; CEO market-stock-unit target, payout range and performance period · Filed 21/08/2026

To earn a target award, the stock price must appreciate by at least 10%.

August 2026 Form 8-K; filed 2026-08-21; stock-price appreciation required for target award · Filed 21/08/2026

In July 2024, the Sentinel program was certified for continuation by the DoW upon completion of the Nunn-McCurdy breach review.

June 2026 Form 10-Q; filed 2026-07-21; Sentinel continuation following July 2024 Nunn-McCurdy breach review · Filed 21/07/2026

The Board consists entirely of independent directors, other than Ms.

2026 proxy statement; filed 2026-04-03; board independence disclosure, opening passage · Filed 03/04/2026

Warden, and continues to exercise a comprehensive, independent oversight function, with fully independent Board committees and a strong Lead Independent Director with clearly articulated responsibilities.

2026 proxy statement; filed 2026-04-03; board independence disclosure, continuation and independent committees · Filed 03/04/2026

Warden Chair, Chief Executive Officer and President, Northrop Grumman Corporation 54 07/2018 Mark A.

2026 proxy statement; filed 2026-04-03; combined chair, CEO and president roles · Filed 03/04/2026

Proxy access Right to call special meeting at 15% threshold Right to act by written consent No supermajority voting requirements

2026 proxy statement; filed 2026-04-03; disclosed shareholder rights · Filed 03/04/2026

Shareholder Proposal Proposal 4 The shareholders did not approve the shareholder proposal to provide for an independent board chair.

May 2026 Form 8-K; filed 2026-05-21; rejection of independent-board-chair proposal · Filed 21/05/2026

On May 20, 2026, DOJ confirmed that, based on the information it had learned to date, the Criminal Division closed its inquiry into this matter.

September 2026 Form 10-Q; filed 2026-10-20; closure of DOJ criminal inquiry on 2026-05-20 · Filed 20/10/2026

The company continues to engage with the government in relation to the CID and the DCMA inquiry.

September 2026 Form 10-Q; filed 2026-10-20; continuing civil investigative demand and DCMA inquiry · Filed 20/10/2026

We cannot at this point predict the outcome of these remaining matters.

September 2026 Form 10-Q; filed 2026-10-20; uncertainty over remaining inquiry outcomes · Filed 20/10/2026

Subsequent Event – In January 2024, the company received a termination for convenience in our restricted Space business.

2023 Form 10-K; filed 2024-01-25; January 2024 restricted-Space termination for convenience · Filed 25/01/2024

The company expects to reduce backlog by approximately $2 billion during the first quarter of 2024 related to the termination.

2023 Form 10-K; filed 2024-01-25; expected backlog reduction associated with restricted-Space termination · Filed 25/01/2024

Publication history

Publication history
VersionUpdatedCompetitive advantage
828/10/2026narrow
728/10/2026narrow
624/10/2026narrow
523/10/2026narrow
422/10/2026narrow
318/10/2026narrow
218/10/2026narrow
118/10/2026Unavailable

Sources

Research methodology and limitations · What is an economic moat?